Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Forrest Gump’ Author Swings Back at NY Times
NewsMax ^ | 5/24/05 | Carl Limbacher

Posted on 05/24/2005 2:27:36 PM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last
Comment #41 Removed by Moderator

To: retrokitten

The book was different in several different ways. True, Forrest could run like the wind, but he was also 6'6" tall. He was also what we used to call an idiot-savant, kinda like Rainman. He couldn't spell his way out of a box, but he was a genius at some complex area of mathmatics. He went into professional wrestling, but wouldn't marry Jenny even (putting it off) though they were living together. In addition, Bubba Gump shrimp company was actually based upon raising shrimp in saltwater ponds/marshes after he got the idea from a little Vietnamese guy.

Finally, he was always being asked to give a speech after ending up in the news in some way or another. He always said the same thing, (which the movie touched upon when he met JFK). He'd say, "I got to p..."


42 posted on 05/24/2005 3:06:34 PM PDT by McGarrett (Book'em Danno)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: retrokitten
Groom wrote another book, as well....

"Better Times Than These", about a 7th Cavalry company in the Ia Drang Valley, early in the Viet Nam war....

Great book!

43 posted on 05/24/2005 3:07:59 PM PDT by steve in DC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

It was the highest grossing movie released in 1994. Lots of people loved it. I would have rather had Pulp Fiction win that year but anyway.


44 posted on 05/24/2005 3:08:05 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

It's really a sad chapter in our cultural history.
The New York Times used to be an excellent newspaper.


45 posted on 05/24/2005 3:10:03 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Williams

"that today's American soldiers are the imperial Hessians"

The Hessians that fought in the Rev. War were not "imperial". They were conscripted by the British. Some did not return to Germany...including one of my ancestors who was captured and escaped.


46 posted on 05/24/2005 3:10:24 PM PDT by Fruit of the Spirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #47 Removed by Moderator

To: Strategerist
Quite. But you know, one does not have to wait 20 years to have that sort of bewilderment about the Academy Awards.

Lately I have been looking at the films fro m what I call "the Golden Age of Westerns" (mostly from the very late 30's thru the very early 60's, people like Ford, Houston, Wayne, etc.) and I am struck just how good those films are Yet they are quite low tech and with very little pretension. They are also quintessentially American. The common strain through them is a focus on mythos rather than ideology, and they assume that the viewer is at least as intelligent as they are.

Hollywood needs to return to the vaults and have a collective gander at there predecessors' works, and take some humility with them.

48 posted on 05/24/2005 3:14:29 PM PDT by CasearianDaoist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Williams
That was my biggest problem with the film. There were the dark elements -- but they're just skimmed over (granted, I could be talking out my keister since I only saw the film once.) and treated with typical Hollywood glibness. It seemed that the film avoided getting too deep into these things (maybe in an effort not to offend, I don't know) and in the end the moral of the story just seems to be "it's all good" 'cause life is jus' a box of chocolates offered up on a park bench by a noble and stoic half wit.

I did like Gary Sinise, though. He always does a great job.

49 posted on 05/24/2005 3:15:24 PM PDT by RepoGirl (You can ban my rottweiler when you can pry her from my cold dead hands...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
Patricia Cohen's qualifications in this area are exactly what?

She can read, sorta. She moves her lips but eventually gets through parts of it.

50 posted on 05/24/2005 3:15:59 PM PDT by Mind-numbed Robot (Not everything that needs to be done needs to be done by the government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook

During World War II, targets (you know, for target shooting)had Japanese faces on them. I suppose, today, that would be considered racist. But they were the enemy, and anyone who would dare consider them racist would have their patriotism called into question. Being unpatriotic in WWII could be bad for your health.


51 posted on 05/24/2005 3:17:14 PM PDT by henderson field
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: Borges

Yeah, that's true. I was thinking back to my college days when we read Voltaire. My one professor went on and on about Candide, then made us watch the film Being There with Peter Sellers. The basic premise was: The noble idiot is so wise that he doesn't need logic and intellectual pretense. In fact, logic and intellect were simply evil producs of white male superiority, and were thus BAD THINGS.


53 posted on 05/24/2005 3:24:37 PM PDT by RepoGirl (You can ban my rottweiler when you can pry her from my cold dead hands...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl

Well, Candide was a satire of such ideas and Leibnizian optimism in general. Voltaire didn't like Rosseau.


54 posted on 05/24/2005 3:26:31 PM PDT by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Borges

PJ O'Rourke had a great rant against the idiocies of Rousseau in one of his books, unfortunately I can't remember which one....


55 posted on 05/24/2005 3:27:50 PM PDT by Strategerist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: RepoGirl

Try Groom's "Better times than these"; I think you'll be a convert.


56 posted on 05/24/2005 3:30:20 PM PDT by gatorbait
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: ex-snook
Good afternoon.
"...and get Rosie the Riveter back into war production."

Rosie never left, she just moved into the cockpits of the A-10s, Blackhawks, and behind the M-2s on the HUMVEEs.

Michael Frazier
57 posted on 05/24/2005 3:37:51 PM PDT by brazzaville (No surrender,no retreat. Well, maybe retreat's ok)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Good for Winston Groom! The NYT just cannot stand ANYTHING that will put America in a good light.


58 posted on 05/24/2005 3:40:31 PM PDT by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I’ve been reading Groom’s book about the Ypres Salient in WWI. Good book. The salient was mainly British; I haven’t detected a Pro-Allied bias, but I am sure the NYT might think that the Germans are given short shrift.


59 posted on 05/24/2005 3:45:24 PM PDT by Plutarch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I believe it was one of the producers (Tisch)--but it could have been the screen writer. But you VHS record every Oscar ceremony, don't you? Please watch it for yourself.


60 posted on 05/24/2005 3:57:01 PM PDT by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-79 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson