Skip to comments.
What the ‘Average Joe’ Can Do About Porn…and Why - (caution; for adult readers only)
CONCERNED WOMEN FOR AMERICA.ORG ^
| MAY 24, 2005
| SARA BRODE
Posted on 05/24/2005 1:42:28 PM PDT by CHARLITE
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 681-691 next last
To: Bella_Bru
61
posted on
05/24/2005 2:14:08 PM PDT
by
TheBigB
(These aren't the droids you're looking for...)
To: freebilly
I like porn I like having real sex, but if like having your jollies on line more power to you....
He must be a Star Wars fan.
(caution; for adult readers only)
Why didn't it just read: All 16 year old boys - come see this thread!
To: Blood of Tyrants
By reading your FReep page, I see that you are probably a God and Christian hater who sees what is the attempt to maintain decency in our society as somehow destroying your "right" to have anal sex with animals in public restrooms.
Wow, might want to have your meds adjusted there, buddy.
Hate to say it but like many of the homo-bashing threads I have to really suspect that the ones with all the energy about it are people that are having trouble repressing their own urges.
To: Clemenza
Hey - what's up. We actually had a four hour conversation about this, not in the gutter, but truthful.
Dr. Laura's last book was 100% right on and she was attacked for it. Men watch porn and go to strip clubs because most women want men to turn their biology off. People will always look for an outlet.
64
posted on
05/24/2005 2:15:44 PM PDT
by
chris1
("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton Jr.)
To: Gone GF
And the Ted Bundy stuff was debunked long ago.Got a source for that? Not calling BS, just like to follow up.
65
posted on
05/24/2005 2:15:56 PM PDT
by
Horatio Gates
(Mullah al-Whipple says,"Don't squeeze the Koran." Safe for septic sytems.)
To: Strategerist; Blood of Tyrants
Considering multiple people independently took you to infer that, then I'd say you inferred that.Yep, the inference is undeniably and transparently self-evident in the text. At best, what was written was not what was meant to be written....
66
posted on
05/24/2005 2:15:59 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: CHARLITE
Just wanted to add that what is probably most troubling is that there are people who claim to be Christian but think porn is no big deal. Maybe there are some of those on this very thread. It's just goes to show how deeply the Church has failed the Lord in certain areas. Repentance is long overdue.
67
posted on
05/24/2005 2:16:21 PM PDT
by
k2blader
("A kingdom of conscience ... That is what lies at the end of Crusade.")
To: Blood of Tyrants; WhistlingPastTheGraveyard
Actually, yes he did infer it
From his first post on this thread: As the article says, a fleeting though gives way to fantacizing which in turn gives way to pornography which gives way to obsessing which leads to rape and child molesting.
68
posted on
05/24/2005 2:16:36 PM PDT
by
Bella_Bru
(In Mercuristan, such questions are not tolerated.)
To: Bella_Bru
Uh, and where did you get that?!
Nowhere in that post suggests that
69
posted on
05/24/2005 2:17:43 PM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Have you gotten your Viking Kittie Patch today? http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
To: CHARLITE
LOL!
This thread may have set a record for the most venomous vitriol posted in the shortest time in the history of FR.
Party on, party people.
70
posted on
05/24/2005 2:18:01 PM PDT
by
Skooz
(Admit Nothing. Deny Everything. Make Counter Accusations.)
To: Blood of Tyrants
And you are a total moron to believe that porn has NOTHING to do with child pornograhy. Legal porn and child porn are completely different. Nobody on these threads is defending kiddie porn.
who sees what is the attempt to maintain decency in our society as somehow destroying your "right" to have anal sex with animals in public restrooms.
You're foaming at the mouth, I fear. Nobody at FR has ever defended such behavior.
Before this goes any further, let's define our terms: the only legal type of porn is porn that is privately viewed by consenting adults and that involves only consenting adults in its production.
71
posted on
05/24/2005 2:18:07 PM PDT
by
Modernman
("Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made. " -Bismarck)
To: Bella_Bru
And that is true for those with weak minds and cannot control thier inhibitions...
72
posted on
05/24/2005 2:18:24 PM PDT
by
Zavien Doombringer
(Have you gotten your Viking Kittie Patch today? http://www.visualops.com/patch.html)
To: AntiGuv
Yep, the inference is undeniably and transparently self-evident in the text My thoughts exactly. It's kind of hard to deny what's plainly written.
73
posted on
05/24/2005 2:18:53 PM PDT
by
gdani
To: conserv13
I was going to add that if your preaching to Freepers, you're barking up the wrong tree...
there's a group freepers who are hypocritical sociopaths, that want everybody to tow the line except just don't pick on their perversions....
If only they had sons in the gay porn field.....we might see an attitude change...maybe if they had young teenage sons stripping for the local gay bar....
74
posted on
05/24/2005 2:18:56 PM PDT
by
cherry
To: LogicalMs
You want violation of the rights of others - how about all the women and children who are forced into sex slavery because of pornography. You can make all the excuses you want for it, but porn is destructive and just plain wrong before God.
75
posted on
05/24/2005 2:19:04 PM PDT
by
arjay
(If the NYT is against it, it must be good for America.)
To: Strategerist
It was easy. You took the Lord's prayer and mocked it by putting in your own little dig against the government making laws about moral behavior. I am not stupid and you are an apoligist for pornography.
76
posted on
05/24/2005 2:19:24 PM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(G-d is not a Republican. But Satan is definitely a Democrat.)
To: Zavien Doombringer
a fleeting though gives way to fantacizing which in turn gives way to pornography which gives way to obsessing which leads to rape and child molesting. So then there is nothing wrong with fantasy or porn, right?
You can't have it both ways. Either his statement was saying a fleeting thought ends up at rape and child molestation, or nothing in his comment is related.
77
posted on
05/24/2005 2:19:47 PM PDT
by
Bella_Bru
(In Mercuristan, such questions are not tolerated.)
To: shotokan
Don't have the source offhand, but I remember reading about it (remember Bundy was a very, very slick psychopath who was very good at manipulating people and telling them what they want)...
IIRC The stuff about Bundy and porn was the result of some fundivangelist minister interviewing Bundy and Bundy telling the minister what he wanted to hear.
To: cherry
Teenage sons stripping for the local gay bar is illegal.
79
posted on
05/24/2005 2:21:18 PM PDT
by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: Blood of Tyrants
It was easy. You took the Lord's prayer and mocked it by putting in your own little dig against the government making laws about moral behavior. I am not stupid and you are an apoligist for pornography.
I believe you have me confused with someone else.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 681-691 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson