Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Tell you congresspersons to vote "No" for H.R. 810
1 posted on 05/22/2005 6:08:45 PM PDT by Sun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Sun

This type of research is part of the future of science. I wouldn't want to hamstring our scientists in the face of increasing competition from South Korea, China, and other nations.


2 posted on 05/22/2005 6:15:25 PM PDT by seacapn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Action Alert, U.S. House votes May 24th on embryo-killing research, H.R. 810

3 posted on 05/22/2005 6:19:01 PM PDT by Coleus (Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun
Liberal Republican Delaware Congress critter is behind this.

Of all the types of stem cell research [ambilical cord, adult, and embryonic] -- only embryonic has been a total failure and is the only immoral one of the three.

I think God is sending a message there -- if the one that fails offends Him.

Ambilical uses the ambilical cord between the baby and the mother. At birth, the cord is discarded. It has the property that it must interact between the DNA of the mother and the DNA of the baby. It also must handle the blood type of both the baby and the mother.

I believe there is a lot of kickbacks on the embryonic stell cell because of the high failure rate and need for billions of dollars to be flushed down the toilet.

Adult stem cell has proven very inexpensive in terms of research trials -- which is bad news for research centers trying to find money to fund research [if that research is inexpensive and requires curtailing research moneys].

8 posted on 05/22/2005 6:35:42 PM PDT by topher (John 5:58 + Exodus 21:22 +Jer 1:5 + Gen 9:6 +John 14:6 + Rev 12:1-17)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun

Some think this is a good bill. Any room for reasonable disagreement here? NO, there is no room. So why bring it up as if everyone here is in agreement.


23 posted on 05/22/2005 7:43:45 PM PDT by cajungirl ({no})
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun

bookmark


29 posted on 05/22/2005 8:31:08 PM PDT by chaosagent (It's all right to be crazy. Just don't let it drive you nuts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun

There was actually a republican party commercial in support of this legislation that I just witnessed on Fox News either this morning or last night. I was really surprised!! Looks like I may be switching to 'independent' sooner than I thought!!


81 posted on 05/23/2005 9:57:49 AM PDT by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Sun

US Senator Predicts Passage of Bill to Allow More Stem Cell Research
By Michael Bowman
Washington
22 May 2005



An influential Democratic senator is predicting congressional passage of a bill that would expand federally-funded medical research involving embryonic stem cells - despite a veto threat by President Bush. Renewed debate on the controversial subject follows reports of a scientific breakthrough involving stem cells by South Korean researchers.

U.S. tax dollars may only be spent on embryonic stem cell research derived from a small number of previously-destroyed embryos - where, as President Bush once noted, "the life-and-death decision had already been made."

But Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman is co-sponsoring legislation that would allow federally funded programs to use new embryonic stem cell lines.

Speaking on ABC's This Week program, Mr. Lieberman said the proposal has a good chance of passing both houses of Congress. "They understand across party lines that stem cell research holds amazing hope for curing diseases, or better treating diseases like diabetes, Parkinson's and a lot of others. This is bipartisan. In the Senate, I am co-sponsor with [Pennsylvania Republican Senator] Arlen Specter of an identical bill. I think we are going to get it done," he said.

The bill could be brought up for a vote in a matter of days.

President Bush has consistently opposed destroying a viable embryo in order to harvest stem cells. Friday, Mr. Bush repeated his opposition and issued a veto warning. "I have made very clear to the Congress that the use of federal money, taxpayers' money, to promote science which destroys life in order to save life, I am against that. And therefore if the bill does that, I will veto it," he said.

Last week, South Korean researchers announced the successful creation of cloned human embryos using genetic material taken from patients suffering a variety of illnesses and medical conditions. The accomplishment is regarded as a major milestone in stem cell research, because, once introduced into the human body, stem cells are unlikely to be rejected by a patient's immune system if they are genetically identical.

Scientists say human embryonic stem cells are formed in the earliest stages of life and can adapt to become any tissue in the body.

But Anne Graham Lotz, the daughter of ailing evangelical minister Billy Graham, said cures and treatments must not be pursued at any cost. "I have a father who has Parkinson's disease, I have a son who has cancer. I have a mother who has degenerative arthritis. I have a husband who has diabetes. I would not want any one of my family members to benefit from the willful destruction of another human life. An embryo, as tiny as it is, is still a human life created in the image of God," he said.

Others take a different point of view. Dana Reeve is the widow of actor Christopher Reeve, who died last year after a prolonged battle with paralysis. "A lot of people will say, 'You have no right to tamper with human life.' This is not a baby. It is not an embryo. It is pre-embryonic. This is something that would not, once implanted, turn into a human being. There is not a disorder you can name that would not benefit from stem cell research. Eyes, heart, lungs - every part of the body [can benefit]," she said.

Some researchers warn unless restrictions are lifted, the United States could quickly fall behind other nations in stem cell research. Public opinion polls show Americans support stem cell research by about a two-to-one margin.


82 posted on 05/23/2005 9:59:30 AM PDT by AgThorn (Bush is my president, but he needs to protect our borders. FIRST, before any talk of "Amnesty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson