Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'I Will Defend To Keep It Based On Free Speech'
KOMO News ^ | May 13, 2005 | Liz Rocca

Posted on 05/16/2005 12:23:19 PM PDT by Irontank

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: Right Angler

Agreed, but the ones I'm more concerned about are the state DMV officials who have obviously decided to take this complaint seriously.


21 posted on 05/16/2005 12:43:24 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Irontank


Could someone please point out to these idiots that neither the Constitution nor the Amendments to the Constitution guarantee that they "shall not be offended"!

22 posted on 05/16/2005 12:43:39 PM PDT by Zacs Mom (Proud wife of a Marine! ... and purveyor of "rampant, unedited dialogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
she should be required to testify at the hearing as to what rights of hers were violated by the plate

Why, her right not to be offended, of course. Forget the fact that her selfish opinion of the plate offends countless Bible-believing Christians.

23 posted on 05/16/2005 12:45:29 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Reagan is King
I think they need to publish her name, home phone, and address

Not to mention her email address and her DU screen name.

24 posted on 05/16/2005 12:47:24 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SheLion; Gabz; Just another Joe

Yep, the right to not be offended goes to the next logical step. What happens when the Righteous Right is prevented from carrying their Bibles in public. At that point, will they realize their "right to not be offended" has been taken to far.

(Note: My use of the term RR does not mean all Christians. It only refers to those with Fascist tendencies.)


25 posted on 05/16/2005 12:51:35 PM PDT by CSM ( If the government has taken your money, it has fulfilled its Social Security promises. (dufekin))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember; Khepera

Gee....wonder if this woman feels her MONEY is "Praying Over Her"........This IS a MISUSE of public funds to listen to every idiot who is "offended."


26 posted on 05/16/2005 12:53:10 PM PDT by goodnesswins (Our military......the world's HEROES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

I don't see why someone that does not believe in the Bible would be any more offended by that vanity plate than by one that said CLANCY LVR.


27 posted on 05/16/2005 12:54:50 PM PDT by RWR8189 (Its Morning in America Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport
Not to mention her email address and her DU screen name.

****************

LOL!! Excellent.

28 posted on 05/16/2005 12:56:58 PM PDT by trisham ("Live Free or Die," General John Stark, July 31, 1809)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
"I will defend to keep it based on free speech," she said.

Screw the free speech. She needs work on correct speech.
29 posted on 05/16/2005 12:58:31 PM PDT by Xenalyte (End women's suffrage! Hasn't the country suffered enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zacs Mom

CONGRESS shall make no law...
Since when did the sstae of Washington become congress?


30 posted on 05/16/2005 12:59:44 PM PDT by threeleftsmakearight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
A Pierce County woman made the complaint, which reads in part: "I was offended that I have to be 'prayed over' by a license plate... What happened to keeping church and state separate?"

It doesn't exist you MORON!

31 posted on 05/16/2005 1:00:25 PM PDT by Fledermaus (Rats theme song: "Whatever it is...I'm AGAINST it!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee_Bob; presidio9
Yo Pres, Bob mentioned the Moro Islamic Liberation Front!


32 posted on 05/16/2005 1:00:37 PM PDT by Xenalyte (End women's suffrage! Hasn't the country suffered enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Irontank
I was offended that I have to be 'prayed over' by a license plate

Can I get a what, what?
33 posted on 05/16/2005 1:03:48 PM PDT by andyk (Go Matt Kenseth!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

LOL....Which raises an interesting question: Does the right to free speech include the right to use poor grammar?


34 posted on 05/16/2005 1:05:30 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

21 years?

Statute of limitations?

Doctrine of Latches?

Denying this establishes anti-religion as an official state religion.


35 posted on 05/16/2005 1:06:16 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunkport

Absolutely, but it carries with it the penalty of being mocked by people like me.


36 posted on 05/16/2005 1:06:24 PM PDT by Xenalyte (End women's suffrage! Hasn't the country suffered enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Xenalyte

LOL...that's called the "freedom to ridicule."


37 posted on 05/16/2005 1:08:18 PM PDT by Kenny Bunkport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AbeKrieger
I once had the letters to spell Jesus on a Scrabble rack.

Nope, not allowed. Jesus is a proper noun. Against the rules of Scrabble. Put in on the back of your car instead.

38 posted on 05/16/2005 1:08:49 PM PDT by scooter2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: threeleftsmakearight
CONGRESS shall make no law... Since when did the sstae of Washington become congress?
The Fourteenth Amendment has been understood to apply the strictures against federal infringement on freedom to the states as well.

Note that the First Amendment says Congress shall make no law rather than saying that "no law shall exist." At the time of the adoption of the First Amendment, some states had established churches. The First Amendment was crafted not to repeal those state laws. And in fact the First Amendment would have been consistent with censorship imposed within a state by its state government. The First Amendment said that that wasn't the federal government's business. Viewed that way, the First Amendment was a bulwark not of individual liberty in general but of States' Rights.


39 posted on 05/16/2005 1:15:10 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters but PR.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Irontank

They are comparing a Bible verse to sexual reference?


40 posted on 05/16/2005 1:16:27 PM PDT by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson