Skip to comments.
Former House Speaker Gingrich Promotes Electronic Medical Records, Increased Federal Investment
MedicalNewsToday.com ^
| 11 May 2005
Posted on 05/11/2005 12:19:20 PM PDT by kingattax
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Rush Limbaugh was talking about this today on his program and apparently during the forum Gingrich was
"praising Hillary Clinton's knowledge about and commitment to improving health care in America."Are you kidding me ????
More praise for hellary...the Bushes getting all 'buddy-buddy' with the clintoons and now Gingrich blowin smoke up Her Thighness' caboose....WHAT THE H*ll IS GOING ON HERE ????
1
posted on
05/11/2005 12:19:22 PM PDT
by
kingattax
To: kingattax
"WHAT THE H*ll IS GOING ON HERE ????"
You took the words right out of my mouth.
2
posted on
05/11/2005 12:20:45 PM PDT
by
demlosers
(Rumsfeld: "We don't have an exit strategy, we have a victory strategy.'')
To: kingattax
Who did you vote for in the last election? Republicrats or Demicans?
3
posted on
05/11/2005 12:21:19 PM PDT
by
OpusatFR
(I live in a swamp and reuse, recycle, refurbish, grow my own, ride a bike and vote GOP)
To: kingattax
Go away, Newt. Ya bother me.
4
posted on
05/11/2005 12:21:36 PM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Controlled substance laws created the federal health care monopoly and fund terrorism.)
To: kingattax
baloney! the bigger the database the more prone it is to errors. remember why we can all get "free" credit reports annually?
i don't want my medical records available to any hacker/cracker/bug/virus/etc.!
imagine someone accessing your medical file and planting a record stating that you are being treated for HIV. Then imagine that information being leaked.
5
posted on
05/11/2005 12:21:46 PM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
To: b4its2late; Recovering_Democrat; Alissa; Pan_Yans Wife; LADY J; mathluv; browardchad; cardinal4; ...
6
posted on
05/11/2005 12:22:02 PM PDT
by
Born Conservative
("Mr. Chamberlain loves the working man, he loves to see him work" - Winston Churchill)
To: kingattax
Gingrich said current methods of estimating the cost of health care IT are "irrational" because they only consider initial investments and do not take long-term savings into account (Belopotosky, TechnologyDaily, 5/10). Gingrich said the federal government should invest $3 billion to $5 billion in health care IT
It's always the same crap. If the long-term savings are significant, THE FRIGGIN' PRIVATE SECTOR WILL DO IT.
Newt, you're demonstrating that you're part of the problem in Washington, not part of any solution.
7
posted on
05/11/2005 12:22:42 PM PDT
by
dirtboy
(Drooling moron since 1998...)
To: kingattax
This crap makes me wonder if there is something to this new world order stuff conspiracy in Washington.
8
posted on
05/11/2005 12:23:05 PM PDT
by
demlosers
(Rumsfeld: "We don't have an exit strategy, we have a victory strategy.'')
To: kingattax
It seems that more and more republs are becoming leftists.
Next time vote Constitutinalist.
9
posted on
05/11/2005 12:23:13 PM PDT
by
Kidan
(www.krashpad.com)
To: kingattax
maybe the hildebeast is thinking of switching parties, and the newt is trying to prepare the faithful?
10
posted on
05/11/2005 12:23:18 PM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
To: kingattax
Gingrich said the federal government should invest $3 billion to $5 billion in health care Does anyone else remember when it was only the Democrats that called increased government spending "investments"?
To: kingattax
First Jeffords, now Newt. Is it any wonder Conservative Republicans are crying out for some Conservative republican leadership?
12
posted on
05/11/2005 12:24:54 PM PDT
by
1Old Pro
To: skip_intro
he said the money should be invested not in health care, but in health care IT - information technology.
hands up for everybody who wants the government keeping everybody's health care records?
remember all the money spent on that FBI computer system that eventually was scrapped?
13
posted on
05/11/2005 12:25:21 PM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
To: demlosers
it sure looks that way.....i about fell out of my chair when i saw an interview last week where Bush 41 said "I won't EVER criticize President Clinton on politics again".
Now THIS ???
you sure could be right, DL !
To: camle
Newt has consistently demonstrated a streak of arrogance that's bother me.
To: kingattax
Hey Neut.......kiss my grits.
16
posted on
05/11/2005 12:28:38 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(MAJOR TAMMY DUCKWORTH.....INSPIRATIONAL)
To: camle
remember all the money spent on that FBI computer system that eventually was scrapped? Are you referring to the $4.5 billion Homeland Security computer system that doesn't work, or is there another scrapped system I forgot about?
To: Eric in the Ozarks
why can't he just go quietly into the night, or keep his talks about something he knows about - econimics?
18
posted on
05/11/2005 12:29:45 PM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
To: skip_intro
not sure. could be the same one. all I know was that it was a heck of a lot of my money for nothing.
19
posted on
05/11/2005 12:30:21 PM PDT
by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
To: kingattax
Newt's been praising the Hildebeast's "work" for some time now. It seems he's going down the primrose path with Lindsey Graham.
Never trust Newt.
20
posted on
05/11/2005 12:31:44 PM PDT
by
Cecily
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-55 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson