|
Posted on 05/10/2005 4:38:41 AM PDT by Libloather
All depends on what Raymond Reggie recorded while chatting with David Rosen...
Can't wait for this author's breaking news about the Bush-haters - eh?
Never saw a headline titled "Delay haters".
Gee, ya think?!
What an interestingly disparaging way of putting this.
I'll bet Gumbel's got an inkling of what's on those tapes. Heh heh heh heh heh.
Anybody who doubts Hillary didnt have knowledge and input in this is a total frickin idiot.
How about:
"Clintons caught cheating again.?
"Does Justice stand a chance?"
Hillary-haters seize on trial of fundraiser in bid to smear Clintons
.... and the problem would be?
This was HER campaign, therefore she is ultimately responsible for how it was handled. Again, the Clintons try to distance themselves from their corrupt inner circle.
To have this done to Hillary would actually require the information to be FALSE. When it is TRUE, it is not a smear.
You forgot the projectile barf alert.
I guess the stupid lib author considers this another 'hate crime'.
The press has been sent the approved Democrat talking points to cover the trial...and the press responds! Today show has set the stage as well...enemies of Hillary must be behind the allegations. It's "amazing" how they seem to coordinate the framing of a story.
Hillary suffers greatly when compared to our current classy first lady. Hillary looses on charm, wit, poise, grace under pressure, and every other measure of one's character, when compared to Laura Bush.
Dr. Condoleezza Rice beats the pants-suit off Hillary when it comes to raw brain power.
Senator Kay Baily Hutchison has a much more distinguished career of accomplishment in the senate than Hillary.
Hillary is really only a celebrity because she is a celebrity, somewhat like Paris Hilton, only Hillary is ugly.
Hillary's only strength is the Clinton News Network and other members of the fading main street media.
If Hillary is repeatedly compared to the high profile women in the republican camp, she will be exposed as the second rate candidate that she truly is, whether or not one of the high profile republican women chooses to run against her.
It is the job of those of us in this increasingly effective "new media" to make that comparison.
No, and the word "smear" would never be used either.
Notice how this writer needs to tell his readers how to feel about this issue before even presenting the facts. Typical.
Here's a newsflash, Mr. Gumbel. People who do not want Hillary Clinton in the Oval Office are not "Hillary Haters". They are "America Lovers" who despise the thought of our country being subjected to more Clinton-rape.
|
"Hillary-haters seize on trial of fundraiser in bid to smear Clintons"
Well, we haven't seen such headlines about this case here in America. YET.
She will slither out of this leaving a trail of slime just like that POS husband of hers has got out of his problems.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
There are multiple material errors of fact in this piece, but since it does not seem to have appeared in the United States yet, I will let him have his fun setting up his Irish readers for a surprise.