Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Flynn denies communion to sash wearers
Star Tribune ^ | May 6, 2005 | Darlene Prois

Posted on 05/08/2005 1:26:32 AM PDT by kingattax

Responding to a directive from the Vatican, Archbishop Harry Flynn has advised all parishes in the Archdiocese of St. Paul and Minneapolis to deny communion to anyone wearing a rainbow-colored sash.

For the past four years, supporters of the Rainbow Sash Alliance USA -- a group of Catholics who are active in the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered community -- have worn the sashes to receive communion at the St. Paul Cathedral on Pentecost Sunday, the anniversary date of the group's founding in 1998.

Last year the service was disrupted when a group of 40 laymen protested the activists receiving communion by kneeling in the aisles in an attempt to block the path to the altar.

The sashes are worn as a symbol of celebration of God-given sexuality, according to Brian McNeill, an organizer of the alliance, who lives in Minneapolis. He said the sashes also represent an invitation to the church to open dialogue on the issue of human sexuality.

As he has in the past, McNeill wrote to Flynn in early April to advise him of the group's intended presence at the Pentecost service on May 15.

In a reply sent Monday, Flynn told McNeill that he had received a directive from the Vatican declaring that wearing the sash during communion is unacceptable.

Flynn said the sash has increasingly been perceived as a protest against church teaching, and asked that group members remove their sashes before receiving communion.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: archbishopflynn; communion; flynn; gagafag; homosexualagenda; homosexuallist; homosexuals; rainbowsash; religiousleft; vatican
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

1 posted on 05/08/2005 1:26:33 AM PDT by kingattax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Let's hope the new pope puts an END to this cr*p straight away.

JPII, for all that he was loved, really let a lot of this stuff get out of control.


2 posted on 05/08/2005 1:32:53 AM PDT by jocon307 (Irish grandmother rolls in grave, yet again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

This new Pope is kicking butt!


3 posted on 05/08/2005 1:40:01 AM PDT by Neanderthal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Arrrrgggghhhhh, we almost missed this part:

"McNeill said. "The church is saying it only wants closeted gay people going to communion. That's troubling to me as a gay man. I think God would want me to be proud of who she created me to be."


4 posted on 05/08/2005 2:12:05 AM PDT by jocon307 (Irish grandmother rolls in grave, yet again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

"McNeill said"

Will no one rid me of this troublesome...

Wait a minute; that didn't work out too well last time, did it?


5 posted on 05/08/2005 2:34:35 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dsc

"Wait a minute; that didn't work out too well last time, did it?"

Oh please, let's try it again, and see what happens!


6 posted on 05/08/2005 2:46:18 AM PDT by jocon307 (Irish grandmother rolls in grave, yet again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
Sorry, but God has declared both in the new and old testament, homosexuality is an abomination in His eyes and therefore a sin. This thing you do that you are so proud of is disgusting to God,and you can see from His word He is not proud of you. (See Gen 19:5,19:11, Liv 18:22, Rom 1:25-27). Amen.
7 posted on 05/08/2005 2:48:10 AM PDT by gakrak ("A wise man's heart is his right hand, But a fool's heart is at his left" Eccl 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
It's not my fault I robbed the bank. God made me a sinner.

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

8 posted on 05/08/2005 2:50:05 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

"As a Gay Man and a Gay Journalist"
-Doug Dangger Bump!


9 posted on 05/08/2005 2:50:23 AM PDT by Capn TrVth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
The sashes are worn as a symbol of celebration of God-given sexuality, according to Brian McNeill...

Uhhhh ... regardless of one's opinion on homosexuality, this argument makes no logical sense. Do we celebrate God-given schizophrenia? God-given cancer? Or irrelvancies such as God-given plastic? God-given freckles?

10 posted on 05/08/2005 2:52:53 AM PDT by Dont Mention the War (Proud Member of the WPPFF Death Cult - We're coming after YOU next!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gakrak

Hey wait a minute, I got a lot of sins, but I'm not a homsexual. I just must state that for the permanent record.


11 posted on 05/08/2005 2:52:58 AM PDT by jocon307 (Irish grandmother rolls in grave, yet again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Dont Mention the War
Because it outrages others is their reason to do it.

It is provocation - remember the movie The Exorcist?

This is coming face to face with evil and the Church needs to stand strong.

12 posted on 05/08/2005 2:59:17 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Capn TrVth

ya know adam and eve. (male and a female...go fig..)

begain the bible and basically introduces the really neat concept.

FREE WILL

god does not make one a bank robber or a gay.
A persons sins are their own, and they must face them and there consiquences.

Isnt it cute how one part of society not only wears there sins openly...but then labels you a hatemogger for not accepting there sins as the lords will.
btw are there sashes for other sins?

maybe ted kennady could wear a nice glutton sash to communion...ya know with lil piggys on it.

clinton with a forked tongue sash...ok clinton would have a closet full of diff sashes.

and what "Sin Sash" goes with Hillery's hair style?

flame on!


13 posted on 05/08/2005 3:01:22 AM PDT by Casaubon (Internet Research Ninja Masta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Neanderthal

Removing a sash isn't enough, they must cease thier sinful ways.
Communion should be administered to all those who ask it reasonably, excluding, at least until they make sufficient reparation, public sinners and such as those who lead openly scandalous lives. So, too, it is not to be given to those likely to treat it with irreverence.
It is as impossible for the soul in the state of mortal sin to receive this Heavenly Bread with profit, as it is for a corpse to assimilate food and drink.
It is for this very reason that St. Paul (I Cor., xi, 28) demands that rigorous "self-examination", in order to avoid the heinous offense of being guilty of the Body and the Blood of the Lord by "eating and drinking unworthily".
Confessing and repenting sin (and meaning it) should precede communion.


14 posted on 05/08/2005 3:07:55 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon
"btw are there sashes for other sins?

Actually, you are supposed to dress modestly, be humble when receiving communion, not use it as an opportunity to stage a protest. The whole act of communion is lost on those people, it does them no good at all.

15 posted on 05/08/2005 3:15:43 AM PDT by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

i agree

Its amazing to me that someone could wear a giant "I am a big fat sinner, and will continue to be" sash to church, much less communion!

its a giant insult to the church.

in effect telling the church to accept my sin as...not a sin.

sheesh


16 posted on 05/08/2005 3:34:57 AM PDT by Casaubon (Internet Research Ninja Masta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon

Contrary to the leftist newly revised version of History, that depicts Abe Lincoln as a closeted Homosexual..

I am fond of pointing out that Abe Lincoln was once asked about the issue of Gays and should they be allowed to "marry".

Lincoln said: "If you count a dogs tail as a "leg"...
How many legs does the dog have?

When one of the local members of the press posited;
"Five Legs?

Lincoln curlty said: "No asshat, a Dog only has 4 legs, because a "Tail" isn't a leg, no matter HOW persistant
the uppity gays may insist that it is!

Therefore Lincoln sagely concluded:,
"There can "BE" no such thing as Gay Marriage"!

Doesn't matter that Lincoln never said any of that,
-it's a great argument, and always manages to gut-hook
some poor unsuspecting purple-oid with a slow sense of humor;>


17 posted on 05/08/2005 3:41:46 AM PDT by Capn TrVth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

Pro-abortion politicicans are next.


18 posted on 05/08/2005 3:42:32 AM PDT by Semper Paratus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon
"Its amazing to me that someone could wear a giant "I am a big fat sinner, and will continue to be" sash to church,"

No kidding!

19 posted on 05/08/2005 3:43:35 AM PDT by Capn TrVth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
God would want me to be proud of who she created me to be

???!!!

20 posted on 05/08/2005 3:46:04 AM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon

It is their argument that Free Will is not involved because they are "born that way". Pure poppycock, of course, but you will argue that one 'till you are blue in the face, and not win. This is the one rock upon which all of their arguments rest, so it must be accepted without question.


21 posted on 05/08/2005 4:07:50 AM PDT by gridlock (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

I guess they have the free will to make that arguement. :)


22 posted on 05/08/2005 4:12:53 AM PDT by Casaubon (Internet Research Ninja Masta)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon

Agreed. This is raw in-your-face confrontation by homosexuals flouting their deviant, vile, disgusting ways. They defy the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass and the Holy Bible.

Why should some receive special consideration just because of the manner in which they choose to have sex?

Oh - if refused, `they will return to their pews and remain standing'. "We're here, we're queer, get used to it!"

BTW, Ted Kennedy should approach the rail wearing an aquamarine sash.


23 posted on 05/08/2005 4:21:16 AM PDT by elcid1970
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: gakrak

To quote Abraham Lincoln:

"I do hot hope God is on my side, I hope that I am on his."

It is God's law deal with it.


24 posted on 05/08/2005 4:29:34 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms, who's bringing the chips?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Neanderthal
This new Pope is kicking butt!

Wow! If this Pope keeps this up, I might just become active in the church again.

25 posted on 05/08/2005 4:34:45 AM PDT by EarlyBird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

The Pope is saying that Communion is not the place for perverts to push their political agenda. If you wish to commit the sin of the perversion outside Church He cannot stop you but bringing it to the altar where you accept the Eucharist is another thing. I dont know why he needed a word from the Pope to get him to do what was right to begin with.

As a Catholic if you go to confession you must confess to having sex outside marriage I suppose its a catch 22 for you since you cannot be married in the church but no more a catch 22 than confessing to using birth control by married couples. Both are hypocritical since they say their penance and promise to amend their lives with no intention of doing so. However they dont wear sashes flaunting their sin when they accept the Euchariist.


26 posted on 05/08/2005 4:46:45 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

It is their argument that Free Will is not involved because they are "born that way". Pure poppycock, of course, but you will argue that one 'till you are blue in the face, and not win. This is the one rock upon which all of their arguments rest, so it must be accepted without question.




You know, I don't know if people are genetically predisposed or not. But even if people ARE "born that way," they still have Free Will when they choose to act upon their urges.

The Church doesn't condemn homosexuals just for BEING homosexual. The Church condemns homosexual BEHAVIOR. Just as it condemns *heterosexual* behavior when it comes to fornication, adultery, etc.

The sashes are a definite slap at Church authority and its teachings. I honestly wish these people who are SO dissatisfied would just change denominations.

I'm so happy with Pope Benedict XVI!!


27 posted on 05/08/2005 5:25:31 AM PDT by USArmySpouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RepublicanMensan; gridlock
It is their argument that Free Will is not involved because they are "born that way".

I am sexually oriented towards committing adultery. I suppose I was born that way.

When I was in ECUSA, it never occurred to be that a sacrament for bessing the motel room keys should be developed.

The fact that the church would condemn my acting on my sexual orientation, should I ever do so, is part of the support structure that promotes fidelity to my wife (plus the fact that she keeps the kitchen shears sharp).

What's the difference between me and the rainbow sashers, that they should be acclaimed in public?

28 posted on 05/08/2005 5:32:24 AM PDT by Jim Noble (Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
hahaha; love your comments most of all, and full of truth with humor.
29 posted on 05/08/2005 6:57:27 AM PDT by rose
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

I guess the rainbow folks didn't read the story of the rainbow and what happened right after. They need to understand the Curse of Ham.


30 posted on 05/08/2005 7:08:39 AM PDT by festus (The constitution may be flawed but its a whole lot better than what we have now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307; Salvation; Coleus; NYer; SoothingDave; cyborg; onyx; fortunecookie; ArrogantBustard; ...
Uh, right. Sometimes all I can say is wow.

"McNeill said. "The church is saying it only wants closeted gay people going to communion. That's troubling to me as a gay man. I think God would want me to be proud of who she created me to be.""

I have news for this person: those who believes God is female are NOT Catholics.

31 posted on 05/08/2005 7:12:36 AM PDT by Petronski (Pope Benedict XVI: A German Shepherd on the Throne of Peter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

The only thing the Sodomites understand is pure and unadulterated intolerance.
Just look at where misdirected Tolerance has gotten us over the last 10 years........
Rallies in schools celebrating Sodomites.
Inculcation of K thru 4th grade children in Sodomy Lifestyles.
Severe restriction on Normal people toward "Tolerance" of disease causing behavior through abnormal Lifestyle.
Etc., Etc., Etc.
See what Criminal Homosexual Abuse by Catholic Priests have wrought over the last 50 years, near total destruction of the Catholic Church.


32 posted on 05/08/2005 7:17:09 AM PDT by chatham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: elcid1970

"BTW, Ted Kennedy should approach the rail wearing an aquamarine sash."

LOL!


33 posted on 05/08/2005 7:52:54 AM PDT by jocon307 (Irish grandmother rolls in grave, yet again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gridlock
because they are "born that way"

If they are really born that way they'll have a couple major problems in the not too distant future. The genetic causes of diseases are currently being identified. If the difference is in their genes (instead of merely in their jeans) we should be able to identify it and test for it in a few years.

What will the, presently pro-abortion, gay lobby say if prospective parents choose to abort their gay inviable tissue masses and try again for one who'll perpetuate the family line?

Identifying genetic abnormalities is an important start, but the dream is to be able to fix them. We should start realizing that dream within a generation. What will (presumably straight) parents decide when their baby's genetic profile test turns up gay? Leave him to be discriminated against or convert him to the straight norm and win grandchildren as a bonus prize? The next gay generation could shrink faster than their HIV generation (and probably with less medical expenses.)

34 posted on 05/08/2005 8:11:07 AM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: kingattax; american colleen; Lady In Blue; Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; ...
Flynn told McNeill that he had received a directive from the Vatican declaring that wearing the sash during communion is unacceptable.

Thank you, Holy Father, for saying "yes"!

Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


35 posted on 05/08/2005 9:48:33 AM PDT by NYer ("Love without truth is blind; Truth without love is empty." - Pope Benedict XVI)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

ROTL at the mitre graphic!


36 posted on 05/08/2005 10:14:58 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: NYer

LOL! Did you Photoshop that image?


37 posted on 05/08/2005 10:41:43 AM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
"I am sexually oriented towards committing adultery. I suppose I was born that way."

I use to think that I was competitively oriented to violence until I sat on a bully's chest and started to choke the life out of him. He was bigger than me, he and his friend were pushing me around, I knocked him down and was about to kill him. But as his eyes bulged and his face turned blue, I felt sorry for him.

I guess I was not born that way.

It was such a young age that I'm not sure that it was even "reason" that stopped me from ending his life ("Mom and dad aren't going to be happy about this."). It may have been that Spirit I received in Baptism that I listened to instead of my own desires.

I asked for a truce and received it from both kids. For the rest of the day, we played as best friends.
38 posted on 05/08/2005 10:54:38 AM PDT by SaltyJoe ("Social Justice" begins with the unborn child.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary
"Removing a sash isn't enough, they must cease thier sinful ways. "

I'm afraid I agree. The non-penitent perverters of God's Church and Law will now simply mock His representatives on earth by proudly wearing their sacred sash all through mass, take it off, and receive the Body of the Most Holy One into their corrupt temples.
Sorry, I am not at all ecstatic over the words from the Archbishop.
39 posted on 05/08/2005 10:57:28 AM PDT by SolomoninSouthDakota (Daschle is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002
"Both are hypocritical since they say their penance and promise to amend their lives with no intention of doing so. However they dont wear sashes flaunting their sin when they accept the Euchariist."

Anyone practicing birth-control by artificial means who confesses it but does not quit the practice is cut off from all sanctifying grace until confessing his/her insincerity in the first place.But since they can not be readily identified coming up to communion, it would take a special soul reading priest to be able to deny them Holy Communion! BTW, anyone practicing artificial birth-control without confessing it is in about the same boat.
40 posted on 05/08/2005 11:04:48 AM PDT by SolomoninSouthDakota (Daschle is gone.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

You caught that too, eh? These people are SO CONFUSED aren't they? If they would step out of the "in your face" attitude and read scriptures, they might actually see that they are wrong.


41 posted on 05/08/2005 11:12:33 AM PDT by June Cleaver (in here, Ward . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Casaubon

GOOD ONE!!funny


42 posted on 05/08/2005 11:27:07 AM PDT by okokie (Terri Schivo Martyr for the Gospel of Life)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: jocon307
I think God would want me to be proud of who(sic) she created me to be."

Pride is one of the seven deadly sins!

As for the she,I'm with Doughboy...

43 posted on 05/08/2005 12:05:02 PM PDT by kennyo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SolomoninSouthDakota

Well: I think thats what I said. But since the men who marry the women taking birth control are equally guilty , what you and I are actually saying is that about 85% of American Catholics between the ages of 25 and 50 are not actually receiving Communion whether they go or not.


44 posted on 05/08/2005 12:06:03 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: NYer

All your base are belong to Ratz...


ROFLOL!!!


45 posted on 05/08/2005 12:08:29 PM PDT by sandyeggo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: EarlyBird

Only if he also stops guitar playing and drums.


46 posted on 05/08/2005 12:10:20 PM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

Now with B16!

JEFF MILLER

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT Jeff Miller. "Now with B16!" Curt Jester (April, 2005).

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Studies have conclusively proven that people taking B16 daily will continue to have smooth running and orthodox metabolism for years to come. B16 in trials has proven not to be harsh or difficult as had been initially reported. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

You might have been told in the past that Humanae Vitaemins were not good for you or that if your conscience decided you didn't need Humanae Vitaemins you could safely ignore them. Latest cultural medical studies have proven the link between lack of Humanae Vitaemins and the lack of children. These studies show the extreme cultural malnutrition from not getting their † RDA of required spiritual nutrition. Now with B16, Ut Unum Sintrum, has all the required nutrients you have relied on in the past and more. B16 works well with and expands with needed daily intake such as VII and JP2 (Beta-Karoltene) and will not interfere in any way with them. In fact the synergetic effect will only enhance your spiritual metabolism.

The B16 caplets have a special smooth coating allowing you to swallow them without any water. Yet it is true with B16 you do not have to water it down in any way. Our B16 is doctrinally pure with no heretical impurities such as those found in anti-Humanae Vitaemins.

Studies have conclusively proven that people taking B16 daily will continue to have smooth running and orthodox metabolism for years to come. B16 in trials has proven not to be harsh or difficult as had been initially reported.

We are also introducing Ut Unum Sintrum for children since your children are never too young to start off with proper spiritual growth. Parents will be pleased to know that our Humanae Vitaemins are not sugar coated, just like everything else we offer with B16 in it. Guaranteed not to cause truth decay or any form of spiritual rot. The children's tablets come in fun shapes like German Shepherds and Rottweilers.

† Ratzinger Daily Allowance

CAUTION

B16 has been known to cause allergies, shrill behavior, and coughing fits to some theologians, clergy, religious, and laity. Especially those who have had Spirit of Vatican Flu in the past. Tell your health care provider if you are dissident and they can help you overcome your deficient diet and prepare you for true health with full dosages of B16. Or contact your local Orthodoxpedic surgeon for further information.


47 posted on 05/08/2005 12:13:24 PM PDT by sandyeggo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: kingattax
The sashes are worn as a symbol of celebration of God-given sexuality, according to Brian McNeill, an organizer of the alliance, who lives in Minneapolis. He said the sashes also represent an invitation to the church to open dialogue on the issue of human sexuality.

Everything these people need to know about sexuality is written in The Bible. Apparently they have never read it, or choose to ignore those parts.

It amazes me that some want the Church to change its position on homosexuality -- which would require a major edit of The Bible. To me, it means that these people believe The Word of God is not the ultimate authority on morality. If this is the case, then why are they even attending church?

They desire the perversion of society, are the work of Satan himself, and either knowingly or unknowingly act as his minions.

48 posted on 05/08/2005 12:22:35 PM PDT by SaveTheChief (<insert clever, witty, or silly statement here>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

I read right over the "she". Thank You for pointing that out!


49 posted on 05/08/2005 12:39:10 PM PDT by Nov3 ("This is the best election night in history." --DNC chair Terry McAuliffe Nov. 2,2004 8p.m.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: sandyeggo

Humanae Vitae(mins), now with B16.


50 posted on 05/08/2005 12:43:31 PM PDT by ELS (Vivat Benedictus XVI!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson