Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Judge Okays Abortion For Girl, 13
St. Petersburg Times ^ | 5/3/05 | Associated Press

Posted on 05/03/2005 7:33:22 AM PDT by areafiftyone

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-264 last
To: newfarm4000n
"If a 14 yo has sex with a 13 yo its rape?"

The way the laws are written, yes... However under most state laws (the age of consent laws apply equally to boys and girls), the boy is too young to give consent as well. So technically, both were raped. It can't be consensual for either one of them because both are too young to give consent.

You'd end up not being able to charge the boy without charging the girl as well.
261 posted on 05/07/2005 1:42:49 PM PDT by babygene (Viable after 87 trimesters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies]

To: verity

"I think this is wishful thinking, Chuck. Society is far too pragmatic to morally evolve in this manner"

True. The day medical technology made abortion (at least in thr 1st trimester) statistically safer than childbirth was the day it became tolerable to most people. Back in the old days, when the only methods available to induce abortion were dirty and dangerous, it was easy to be against it.


262 posted on 05/09/2005 8:04:04 AM PDT by sawdust ("Justice Marshall has made his decision, now let him enforce it"--Pres. Andrew Jackson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: Captain Peter Blood
Now do you find it acceptable for abortion in cases of Rape, Incest or the Mother's life being in danger?

Listen to yourself! How can there be a mother unless there is a child?

Now in this case we do not know what the circumstances of the pregnancy was. Was it rape? If so are you going to make this child have that baby? What if this was your 13 year old child, are you going to make her have this baby ?

Those words in bold are your own. She already has the baby. The only question is whether the mother is is going to have a live baby or a dead baby. The judge has decided that it is acceptable that the baby be torn to shreds by an abortionist.

Tell me, by what principle it is acceptable to kill children for the crime of their fathers? Tell me, by what principle it is acceptable to commit another act of violence against the mother and the baby, and how does it undo the first act of violence?

Suppose you had been a baby in a similar circumstance. Would you still feel that it would have been acceptable to butcher you?

Cordially,

263 posted on 05/09/2005 12:53:01 PM PDT by Diamond (Qui liberatio scelestus trucido inculpatus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: areafiftyone

Her life probably was a mess already...but is this her fault...in the system for 4 yrs.?...I suspect this is why she had sex at so young of an age...looking for someone to love her, show her some kind of affection. This little girl has a long road ahead of her and for everybody to sit in judgement of her, it makes me wonder who are the adults.


264 posted on 06/01/2005 5:54:15 AM PDT by cmmiller1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-264 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson