Skip to comments.
Hell on two legs - the Tiny Generation
Sydney Morning Herald ^
| 4/12/05
| Hugh Mackay
Posted on 04/12/2005 10:01:28 AM PDT by qam1
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
04/12/2005 10:01:32 AM PDT
by
qam1
To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; tortoise; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; malakhi; m18436572; ...
Written about Australia but it mirrors the United States
Xer Ping
Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effect Gen-Reagan/Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations (i.e. The Baby Boomers) are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.
Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.
2
posted on
04/12/2005 10:03:21 AM PDT
by
qam1
(There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
To: qam1
Coming the the US soon. Most of Europe is already there.
I read somewhere that the average child in Europe right now is growing up without any extended family. No cousins, no uncles or aunts, and soon no parents.
3
posted on
04/12/2005 10:10:07 AM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: redgolum
Coming the the US soon. Most of Europe is already there. As is Japan and Korea. And China, India and parts of the Muslim world aren't far behind.
A demographic crash is on the horizon.
4
posted on
04/12/2005 10:12:58 AM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: qam1
more highly educated self-centered females tend to have fewer childrenThere, fixed that.
5
posted on
04/12/2005 10:14:21 AM PDT
by
MEGoody
(Ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free.)
To: MEGoody
Folks should not have kids if they don't want them.
6
posted on
04/12/2005 10:15:37 AM PDT
by
k2blader
(Immorality bites.)
To: qam1
The impact of that on personal taxation levels can be easily imagined: today's top marginal rates will seem like a cruel joke to this generation. In compensation, though, unemployment will be a thing of the past. When it comes to jobs, they'll be able to pick and choose, just like their grandparents did in the 1950s. Au contraire, I submit that unemployment will be very high. The tax structure needed to support the retirees will be punitive, and will drive a lot of Australian business operations offshore.
7
posted on
04/12/2005 10:18:40 AM PDT
by
Mr. Jeeves
("Violence never settles anything." Genghis Khan, 1162-1227)
To: qam1
I got a thing from Smith Barney yesterday. It made me ill. All it talked about was the boomers this and the boomers that ... what the boomers do and don't do is, according to whichever analyst wrote it, THE key to the mastery of future investments. Look I realize that the boomers have a lot of pull in numbers, but (broad brushstroke on) they are also the largest per capita carriers of debt, undertakers of divorce, and, in general, the most financially lame generation ever to exist. (/broad brush stroke). To underestimate the economic impacts of smaller, but per capita, more fiscally healthy, generations, is, IMHO, a major screw up.
8
posted on
04/12/2005 10:20:57 AM PDT
by
GOP_1900AD
(Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
To: Modernman
Actually, it is logical to expect slowing of Earth population at some point of civilization's development. It might turn to be painful for our children and grandchildren to get over that point in history, but on the global scale the current exponential grows of population is even scarier.
To: Neocon Shavuz
Actually, it is logical to expect slowing of Earth population Slowing has been going on for some time. What we're looking at now is shrinkage. If people aren't going to vote for the continuation of their civilization by making babies, their civilization will not continue. A new one will take its place.
If you want to write a letter to your great-great-great-grandchildren, you should probably plan in writing it in Spanish. They will probably live in a Latin American country, even though they never set foot south of the Rio Grande.
10
posted on
04/12/2005 10:34:21 AM PDT
by
Campion
To: Modernman
No! No! No! Overpopulation is the problem!
Stop staring at my leisure suit.
There are too many children in the world! This Paul Ehrlich cat knows what's going down! Let me lay this on you . . .
Hey . . . can you stop rifling through my 8-tracks and listen for a second?
11
posted on
04/12/2005 10:35:22 AM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave soldiers and their Commander in Chief)
To: qam1
"Child-free restaurants will become increasingly popular as non-parents continue to complain about the presence of other people's children spoiling their fun"
Very true. Some years ago my friends (a family with a child) invited me to a restaurant - there were other patrons with a baby operating at 150+db level. When the waiter finally came for orders, I requested the noisy tot, "well done". It took quite a time for the joke to sink, and the look on the waiter's face was priceless.
12
posted on
04/12/2005 10:37:23 AM PDT
by
GSlob
To: qam1
A society that does not reproduce itself is a society with low self esteem.
The entire West seems to have low cultural self esteem.
13
posted on
04/12/2005 10:38:50 AM PDT
by
NeoCaveman
(The DUmmie ants are watching us watching them watching us watching them)
To: GSlob
"Child-free restaurants will become increasingly popular as non-parents continue to complain about the presence of other people's children spoiling their fun" I have nothing against well-behaved children in even the fanciest restuarants. However, many parents seem unable or unwilling to control their kids.
14
posted on
04/12/2005 10:48:34 AM PDT
by
Modernman
("I'm in favor of limited government unless it limits what I want government to do."- dirtboy)
To: qam1
I'm willing to help some aussie women with, uh, child bearing issues.
15
posted on
04/12/2005 11:01:29 AM PDT
by
Crazieman
(UESR: Union of European Socialist Republics)
To: Campion
I would like to look beyond my cultural or linguistic preferences. Most of today's World willingly or not lives by the heritage of Ancient societies of Greece, Rome, Judea, etc. who's original languages we don't use anymore. The values, knowledge and freedom only meter. If my grandkids will speak Spanish - fine with me as soon as they don't leave in socialist or even worse, communist, society.
My concern is not to let another Dark Ages happen. That would be truly a set back for civilization.
17
posted on
04/12/2005 11:06:29 AM PDT
by
little jeremiah
(Resisting evil is our duty or we are as responsible as those promoting it.)
To: k2blader
That almost makes sense doesn't it?
18
posted on
04/12/2005 11:11:19 AM PDT
by
ßuddaßudd
(7 days - 7 ways (but you must follow the instructions carefully))
To: MEGoody
"'more highly educated self-centered females tend to have fewer children'
There, fixed that."
Oh, come now. Making babies makes you selfless? Welfare queens, any1?
19
posted on
04/12/2005 11:25:14 AM PDT
by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: redgolum
Not in my area...average is about 4 children per household...
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson