Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2

While I admire Rumsfeld I'm not a big fan of this kind of mentality. One cannot reduce warfare to formulas unless it is a simple ratio of dead and surrendered enemies to live enemies. That is the only true measure of success. I dare say the pounding of Fallujah intimidated more potential enemies and won more hearts and minds than any sewer or water project. It didn't make anyone love us, but it certainly made more than a few respect us.


2 posted on 04/05/2005 1:11:53 AM PDT by flying Elvis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: flying Elvis
In war there is no substitute for victory.

General Douglas MacArthur, April 19, 1951.

3 posted on 04/05/2005 1:52:56 AM PDT by John Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: flying Elvis
While I understand your sentiment in dealing with reducing warfare to simple formulas, I would strongly disagree with not using available data to determine what tactics worked and what didn't. Measurements are the best way IMO to find activities that were more effective than others. If I can figure out a way to pound fallujah while not exposing my troops to unnecessary danger, I'm going to do it. The Numbers Weenies are your best bet in this vein of thought. Why not use a resource that Americans are really good at. We can crunch numbers with the best.
5 posted on 04/05/2005 6:02:39 AM PDT by Explodo (Pessimism is simply pattern recognition)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson