Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don Imus's Ranch For Sick Children Draws Scrutiny: Charity Spent $2.6 Million Last Year on 100 Kids
Wall Street Journal ^ | March 24, 2005 | Robert Frank

Posted on 03/24/2005 3:25:36 AM PST by billorites

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 next last
To: sinkspur
A guy buys some property, flies in terminally ill children at no cost, and these creepy reporters hound him like hell.

It's a tax shelter to hide income. ABC did a story on it last night. See http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/Politics/story?id=610830&page=1

141 posted on 03/25/2005 4:49:24 AM PST by JoeGar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
So Billy Sol Hargus' First Church of the Gooey Death now has its own Vatican.

I remember when Imus first came to NY @ 1971-72 and when he fell from grace courtesy of Bolivia (used to see him staggering out of Fifty Roc toward his limo) and then of course his comeback as a somewhat mature individual. I've also met Diedre, the former cheerleader who married well, on a couple of occasions. How to describe her...patronizing, humorless, insufferable. She has that "I know better than you because I'm so rich" attitude that limousine liberals carry. You want to shout, "Hey bimbo, you married wealth, you didn't build it yourself."

From the very beginning this ranch looked to me like a Don Imus retirement plan. I still believe so. There is just no other explanation for the amount of money spent to design, build, equip, furnish and decorate the SouthWest luxurious 14000 sf "hacienda", the boss' digs.

As I wrote before, do the kids benefit, yeah. Do Mr. & Mrs. Imus benefit, hell yeah.

142 posted on 03/25/2005 4:53:41 AM PST by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: elli1
Well, when my boys were younger, I sent them to White Pines Ranch for Summer Camp at $400 each per week.
143 posted on 03/25/2005 5:40:53 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

I'm not surprised at all at their personal attitudes. Still, there are plenty of "charites" out there that one can make the same charge of "not helping enough". Yeah, Imus is a burned out SOB and I wonder with the amount of wealth this guy has, why he even bothers. But people do all sorts of things to make themselves feel good. However, the article on the front page of the Wall Street Journal really did have the appearance of a hit job a la the NY Times or Washington Post. I know, put on your tin foil hats. He probably has so many enemies it's too easy to come up with any number of conspiracies. He's been ranting against the drug companies over mercury... perhaps they've heard enough. Or better yet, perhaps dumber-than-dirt Kerry finally figured out that the Imus endorsement hurt him more than helped. Or maybe it's just some New Mexican rancher war. Join in any time. It can be fun.


144 posted on 03/25/2005 5:41:54 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: rhombus

To me one sure measure of a man is how he treats his own children. By this standard Imus is a huge failure. He has a few daughters from previous marriages. He has nothing to do with them at all and hasn't for years and years. One would think that Damien-like Wyatt is his sole progeny.


145 posted on 03/25/2005 5:50:55 AM PST by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 144 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

I would think maybe his daughters don't want anything to do with Imus. As for Uday Wyatt... well I like to think he's payback and Damien will only grow more so.


146 posted on 03/25/2005 6:25:11 AM PST by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: infocats
Pretty funny, Imus bitching and moaning about the press, when he make a living doing EXACTLY what Robert Frank does.

Reading the WSJ article, I see nothing defamatory.
147 posted on 03/25/2005 6:33:28 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: wtc911

Pretty funny this am. Imus of course ranted on for at least an hour about the WSJ article. during the rant, he panned to one of the kids at the ranch and the prodded him, "Do you have an Imus impression?"

The kid in a dead on Imus voice goes "God damn it Wyatt!"


148 posted on 03/25/2005 6:35:04 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 145 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
The same rationale could and is used about every religious organization that has property.

how many ministers live in a 14,000 SF home featured in Reader's Digest?

http://www.dienviro.com/s950/images/Achitectural_Digest.pdf

149 posted on 03/25/2005 6:39:13 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I meant Architectural Digest.


150 posted on 03/25/2005 6:39:29 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
when he make a living doing EXACTLY what Robert Frank does.

Imus writes for the WSJ?

Reading the WSJ article, I see nothing defamatory.

I guess you wouldn't if you didn't believe he had a reputation in the first place.

151 posted on 03/25/2005 6:46:29 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 147 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

I saw that (the kid's profane Imus imitation). Speaks volumes.


152 posted on 03/25/2005 6:51:26 AM PST by wtc911 ("I would like at least to know his name.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

Let Imus try to sue the WSJ. Now THAT would be funny.


153 posted on 03/25/2005 6:54:18 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

He won't have to sue. The WSJ reporter and whoever authorized the article have been made to look petty and foolish. Imus is winning this one in the court of public opinion - although not on FR, where so many just don't get it.


154 posted on 03/25/2005 6:57:26 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: All

Seems to be two schools of thought on this topic.

1. Imus is a blasphemous liberal asshole and we should unleash the IRS on him.

2. Let's be reasonable.


155 posted on 03/25/2005 6:57:31 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: eno_

I wonder if the kids get to use the Master Bath outdoor shower designed to look like Aztec ruins.


156 posted on 03/25/2005 6:58:49 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
He won't have to sue. The WSJ reporter and whoever authorized the article have been made to look petty and foolish. Imus is winning this one in the court of public opinion - although not on FR, where so many just don't get it.

He won't sue, becasue he has NO CASE. I don't think the reporter has been made to look foolish at all. All I have seen is the goons on Imus calling him names like "schmuck", "little bitch", and Imus whining the WSJ deliberately wrote the article to punish him about his speaking out about vaccines.

Imus has lost it.

157 posted on 03/25/2005 7:02:05 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: zook

It was ok for Imus to rant on and lie about Rumsfeld, Cheney, and Bush for months but one reporter writes one factually correct article about Imus, and its the end of the friggin world with Imus nailing himself to a cross for sympathy.

BOO HOO Imus.


158 posted on 03/25/2005 7:04:33 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: finnman69

Lost what?

Look, I wouldn't try to change your mind about Imus. It's adult entertainment.

If you don't believe Imus is doing good charity work - take your money elsewhere.


159 posted on 03/25/2005 7:05:42 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny

I never said Imus does not do good charity work.

But the reporter was not wrong in stating that Imus lives on a 4000 acre ranch with a 14,000sf house or that he spends a lot of time at the ranch. It looks like a really really nice place to live despite Imus's absurd claim, it's hard living there.


160 posted on 03/25/2005 7:10:38 AM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180181-194 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson