Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ANWR Amendment (Cantwell) DOES NOT PASS

Posted on 03/16/2005 11:01:57 AM PST by BladeLWS

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-436 next last
To: patco13

ANWR won't make a huge dent in domestic supply. What it will do is open other fields to exploration and drilling, and that WILL help supply in the long term.


41 posted on 03/16/2005 11:13:43 AM PST by Terpfen (New Democrat Party motto: les enfant terribles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jpl
I wonder who the four fake Republicans who voted against were.

I am waiting to find out also!

42 posted on 03/16/2005 11:14:14 AM PST by rocksblues (Rino's = Collins, Snowe, DeWine, Graham, Specter, Coleman, McCain developing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BladeLWS; hellinahandcart; farmfriend; Carry_Okie; cyborg; Lil'freeper; NYC GOP Chick

Should not have been 51-49. Let me guess.... Chaffee, Snowe, Collins, Sphincter.


43 posted on 03/16/2005 11:14:18 AM PST by sauropod (Heaven for the climate and Hell for the company - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BladeLWS

Oh that maverick McCain!


44 posted on 03/16/2005 11:14:46 AM PST by Righty_McRight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: jpl

Party line Crossers:

Dems:
Landrieu, Akaka and Inouye voted NO

Reps:
Chafee, Coleman, McCain, and Snowe voted Yea


45 posted on 03/16/2005 11:15:13 AM PST by Republican Red (DU: ''Reality sucks. That's the problem. We want another reality.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: DM1

Sure hope so.


46 posted on 03/16/2005 11:15:37 AM PST by sauropod (Heaven for the climate and Hell for the company - Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

The dirty little secret about no new refineries is, the owners of existing refineries have made damned sure no new ones get built.


47 posted on 03/16/2005 11:15:42 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: patco13

probably more symbolic than anything. From what I've read ANWR won't bring much help to the shortfalls, especially in the short term.


48 posted on 03/16/2005 11:15:45 AM PST by timtoews5292004
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: cherry

What earth are you reffering to when you say tearing up the Earth.


49 posted on 03/16/2005 11:16:09 AM PST by cksharks (ew prayers for them because they will need it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: odoso

Stupid? I'll tell you stupid - stupid is to hold a whole nation hostage over a few caribou. That is stupid.

Please rationalize the worth of giving a whole reserve to caribou while we have people on welfare in the U.S. who, of course, can not pay higher gasoline bills.

A little common sense in government would be very helpful to taxpayers.


50 posted on 03/16/2005 11:16:14 AM PST by ClancyJ (Sometimes we're a think tank, and sometimes we're just a tank ! - SlowBoat 407)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sauropod

yeah he is gone and the seat will be a D in name and in practice only shot we have is if the Kooky Cranston mayor runs
Repub but crazy so he holds crossover appeal


51 posted on 03/16/2005 11:17:01 AM PST by DM1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: BladeLWS

I worked in the North Slope oil fields for 26 years. During that time several exploratory wells were drilled from the village of Kaktovik off shore from ANWR. There is at least as much oil there as was at Prudhoe Bay, perhaps more. Of course, the environazis will not believe this even after it is proven out because it is against their religion.


52 posted on 03/16/2005 11:17:02 AM PST by 43north
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: patco13

"Studies of the ANWR coastal plain indicate it may contain between 6 and 16 billion barrels of recoverable oil (between 11.6 and 31.5 billion barrels in-place). With enhanced recovery technology, ANWR oil could provide an additional 30 to 50 years of reliable supply. Natural gas, produced with the oil, could be reinjected or added to a new gas pipeline originating in Prudhoe Bay.

Petroleum development at Prudhoe Bay has not negatively affected wildlife. For instance, the Central Arctic caribou herd is at home with pipeline facilities and has grown from 3,000 to as high as 27,100 in the last 20 years. Drilling activity in ANWR would be limited to winter months when wildlife does not frequent the coastal plain.

Constantly improving technology has greatly reduced the footprint of Arctic oil development. If Prudhoe Bay were built today, facility designs show the footprint would be 64% smaller."

http://www.anwr.org/case.htm


53 posted on 03/16/2005 11:17:17 AM PST by Diana in Wisconsin (Save The Earth. It's The Only Planet With Chocolate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: patco13

at its projected peak output in 2070 ANWR would produce less than 2 percent of our needs, so it's symbollic...or shortsighted.


54 posted on 03/16/2005 11:17:22 AM PST by denver larry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier

"I do believe believe the Senator done changed his stance on offshore drillin'"


55 posted on 03/16/2005 11:17:27 AM PST by dfwgator (It's sad that the news media treats Michael Jackson better than our military.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: timtoews5292004

There's still plenty of crude under California but good luck getting a permit to drill for it.


56 posted on 03/16/2005 11:17:31 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: odoso

"Perhaps, but I wouldn't have a problem if the environmentalist whacko's had won... Seems a little F'n stupid to me over a 6 month supply of oil."

What is fact and fiction here? First I hear that we're talking about six months worth of oil.. then I hear that these are large reserves.


57 posted on 03/16/2005 11:17:43 AM PST by nikos1121
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: patco13

....Why do we want to drill in ANWR?.....

A better question - why would we not want to drill in ANWAR?

The caribou? The pristine area untouched that no one ever will visit to see?


58 posted on 03/16/2005 11:17:51 AM PST by ClancyJ (Sometimes we're a think tank, and sometimes we're just a tank ! - SlowBoat 407)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: bfree
I'd like to see a Wal*Mart built up there in ANWR, just to really tick them off.
59 posted on 03/16/2005 11:18:00 AM PST by advance_copy (Stand for life, or nothing at all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
THE DRILLING BEGINS IN FIVE MINUTES!!!

LOL!
60 posted on 03/16/2005 11:18:05 AM PST by Pox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 421-436 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson