Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Were Cavemen Painting For Their Gods?
The Telegraph (UK) ^ | 2-23-2005

Posted on 03/06/2005 3:20:58 PM PST by blam

Were cavemen painting for their gods?

(Filed: 23/02/2005)

The meaning of Ice Age art has been endlessly debated, but evidence is increasing that some was religiously motivated, says Paul Bahn

At least 70,000 years ago, our ancestors began to adorn their bodies with beads, pendants and perhaps tattoos; by 35,000 years ago, they had begun to paint and engrave animals, people and abstract motifs on cave walls, like those in Lascaux, France, and Altamira in Spain. They sculpted voluptuous figurines in ivory or stone, such as the Venus of Willendorf.

Underestimating art: 35,000 years ago, our ancestors began painting representations of animals

Ever since Ice Age art began to be discovered a century ago, people have wondered what it meant. How could we understand what these early artists were trying to express? Many theories have been put forward – "art for art's sake", totemism, hunting magic and so on.

But all fell by the wayside as evidence accumulated that these theories were at best incomplete and usually untenable.

Much nonsense has been published about "shamans", hallucinations and the like, but these fantasies tell us a great deal about the theorists and nothing about the Ice Age artists. Indeed, it denies them any kind of creativity, and relegates artistic production to the recording of images seen in "altered states of consciousness".

I believe that recent efforts have uncovered compelling evidence that motivation for some Ice Age art – though by no means all – was religious. There is hard evidence which gives us a glimpse of what they were striving to accomplish.

One of the most important and useful factors inherent in the study of rock or cave art is that its location has not changed – it is still where the artist chose to put it and the viewer is occupying the same space that the artist occupied. This can give us a great deal of information that is far more solid and dependable than speculations about meaning.

For example, the decorated gallery of Fronsac in the Dordogne is only 35cm wide, while the "antelopes" of Pech Merle – fantastic, imaginary creatures – are drawn in a tiny chamber into which only one or two people can squeeze.

One must always bear in mind the role played in any culture by features of the landscape or of a site which were associated with particular myths or legends or events, traditional or tribal territories, sacred or holy areas or taboos.

Similarly, in any culture there may be "good" places and "bad" places; and even inside caves there were probably places where such intangible factors played an important role in the decoration of the walls.

I experienced this in the Eighties, when I accompanied the American writer John Pfeiffer to the French cave of Font de Gaume (Dordogne) one evening, with small candles for light. Both of us independently discovered that we had both felt at ease and happy inside the profusely decorated "bison sanctuary" at the end of the main corridor. But we both felt distinctly ill at ease in a different, undecorated part of the cave, and were glad to leave.

What was remarkable was that the curator of the cave had had the same feelings in those same parts of the cave.

The natural architecture of caves played a role in the way in which they were decorated. In many it seems obvious that the artists studied the layout of chambers, passages and major concretions – indeed, in some cases they may have placed markers at significant spots.

Another factor which may have played a significant role in the choice of location is acoustics. Today, we tend to enter these caves speaking in hushed tones, but this may be wrong – the original artists or users of the caves may well have been singing, chanting or praying loudly while the images were being made or used.

We will never know, but studies of acoustics in some Ice Age-decorated caves have detected a correlation between the locations of decoration and those places where men's voices can best be heard. Often, the areas with the best decoration have the best acoustics, while undecorated areas are totally flat in terms of sound quality.

In view of the obvious intelligence of the artists, it is extremely likely that, just as they took full advantage of the morphology of the cave and of particular rock shapes, so they would also have used any acoustic peculiarities.

Anyone who has heard stalactites being played inside a deep, dark cave – they produce a soft marimba-like sound – will know how amazing the experience can be.

One of the characteristics of Ice Age cave art is the exploitation of undulations in walls: this has been apparent since the discovery in 1879 of the Altamira bison drawn on protruding ceiling bosses. To gain a better idea of how these shapes would have appeared to Ice Age visitors, it is necessary to replicate the sources of light they would have used.

The same applies to studies of the visibility, or lack of it, of different figures, and this is the aspect which, I believe, can take us the farthest into the minds and motivations of the artists.

Much cave art appears to us to be "public", or at least on open display (although we have no idea which members of a group were allowed to see it, nor whether large numbers of people ever gathered in big cave chambers or around open-air figures). In certain cases, Ice Age people deliberately made it easier for the imagery to be seen by breaking stalagmites and stalactites.

More intriguing are the numerous cases where the imagery was purposely hidden, up high chimneys, under low overhangs or in niches. Such imagery was not made to be seen by other Ice Age people, but was intended to be seen by – or was offered to – something else, perhaps a deity, spirit or ancestor. In other words, some cave art (but not necessarily all of it) was clearly religious in some way and produced out of strongly held motivations.

The ultimate example of this phenomenon has been found in the cave of Pergouset, in the Lot region of France, where the engraved art begins only after a long crawl, at full stretch, down a narrow, low, wet and unpleasant passage.

One of the engraved figures, a horse head, was made at arm's length inside a fissure into which the artist could not possibly have inserted his or her head: even the artist never saw this figure; it was not meant to be seen by human eyes.

Inaccessibility seems to be the crucial factor in most of the "private" art. Indeed, the overcoming of obstacles, the discomforts and dangers, seemed to have been more important than the actual images.

From what we know of the Maya of Central America, one of the few other ancient cultures which habitually decorated deep caves, it seems the art was not made to last; its survival was irrelevant. The placing of figures in the most inaccessible location possible was linked to remoteness from the normal everyday world – and it is this remoteness which made the images as sacred as possible.

This could certainly be true at Le Tuc d'Audoubert in the French Pyrenees, where the famous clay bison were made, at the far end of the cave, after a tortuous and arduous journey of 900m – the farthest point that could be reached. The images were left there in the darkness, and almost certainly nobody returned to see them until their discovery in the early 20th century.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: archaeology; art; caveart; cavedrawings; cavemen; cavepainting; cavepaintings; creswellcrags; epigraphyandlanguage; for; ggg; gods; godsgravesglyphs; history; macroetymology; marysettegast; painting; paleosigns; platoprehistorian; their; were
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: blam

You can see her gotch.


21 posted on 03/06/2005 5:03:38 PM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the 9

(smile)


22 posted on 03/06/2005 5:05:04 PM PST by Lazamataz (Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ladyrustic

She's probably a Saints fan.


23 posted on 03/06/2005 5:05:20 PM PST by Sam Cree (Democrats are herd animals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: blam
I have always believed that these were sacred images since most cultures that did rock paintings into historical times felt that way. While the religious significance of the images is lost to us, the fact that they were done with great difficulty is not. The most common religion found in hunting societies is a form of shamanism. Shamanism often works much like witchcraft, where intent gives objects their power. The images may of worked like a spell giving the shaman power over the images. Later with the invention of writing, magic often is worked with just a name or words written with sacred intent. Some may represent mythical figures and others may represent desired results. Many shamanistic beliefs involved journeys into the underworld to obtain what was needed for the tribe. A descent into the bowels of the earth to work your most sacred magic seems like it would have great power, both for the shaman and the tribe.
24 posted on 03/06/2005 5:26:03 PM PST by dog breath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam
Much nonsense has been published about "shamans", hallucinations and the like, but these fantasies tell us a great deal about the theorists and nothing about the Ice Age artists.

It is a poor author who heeds not his own caution.

25 posted on 03/06/2005 6:13:09 PM PST by Old Professer (A man's conscience is like his garden, it is his and his alone to tend.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"You can see her gotch."

LOL. The controversal item is on her head. Humans weren't suppose to be weaving clothing at that time. Her cap looks woven, doesn't it?

26 posted on 03/06/2005 6:50:14 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
"Anthropology. According to University of Illinois archaeologist, Olga Soffer, the earliest-known headwear may be represented by a woven cap worn by an Upper Paleolithic figurine (the Venus of Willendorf) from Austria (Wong 2000). Venus figurines date back to ca. 27,000 years ago. (N.B.: Others have interpreted the impressions on Venus's head as coifed hair.)"
27 posted on 03/06/2005 6:53:35 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; SunkenCiv; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; 4ConservativeJustices; ...
Thanks Blam.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on, off, or alter the "Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list --
Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

28 posted on 03/06/2005 8:40:41 PM PST by SunkenCiv (last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Sunday, February 20, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dog breath

There is a cave in El Juyo, Spain, in which a rock with a natural fissure in it has been carved on one side in the figure of a cat, and on the other in the figure of a man. I believe that the people who did that, and who made the cave paintings were in such awe of the world around them, and of the mysteries of even their own being, that they dealt with it the only way they could - artistically. It is recognition, acknowledgment, whatever you want to call it, but why would they do it if they didn't have an inkling already that there was something beyond themselves, greater than themselves?


29 posted on 03/06/2005 8:46:36 PM PST by SlowBoat407 (Bekaa to the future!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: almcbean
"24,000-22,000 BCE" - must stand for Before Consuming Everything.

How About:

"24,000-22,000 BCE" - must stand for Before Creatures Evolved.

Man freezing in a cave wishing for food.

30 posted on 03/06/2005 8:48:01 PM PST by Major_Risktaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
Cretan Mythology
WebArchive
www.good.co.uk/oneworld/minoan.html
[original is a dead link]
Robert Graves mentions in his book The White Goddess that an Aurignacian cave painting at Cogul in Spain depicts a similar ceremony or ritual. The scene shows a young man naked, apart form a pair of leather buskins, surrounded by nine witches with conical hats. Next to them is a black pig or boar which no doubt represents the Dark Goddess synonymous with the Moirae or Fates and running away is a young fawn with another rider on its back representing the escaping soul of the doomed victim. The entire scene parallels the myth of Perseus, his encounter with the Graeae and his decapitation of the Gorgon Medusa apart from the more obvious patriarchal revisions.


Rock Shelter Painting, Cogul, Lerida, Spain
Women and Animals: Rock Shelter Painting, Cogul, Lerida, Spain, c. 4000-3000 BC (BCE), Museo Arqueologico, Barcelona



FR Lexicon·Posting Guidelines·Excerpt, or Link only?·Ultimate Sidebar Management·Headlines
Donate Here By Secure Server·Eating our own -- Time to make a new start in Free Republic
PDF to HTML translation·Translation page·Wayback Machine·My Links·FreeMail Me
Gods, Graves, Glyphs topic·and group·Books, Magazines, Movies, Music


31 posted on 03/06/2005 8:59:18 PM PST by SunkenCiv (last updated my FreeRepublic profile on Sunday, February 20, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blam

bttt


32 posted on 03/06/2005 9:04:59 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Black conical hats ...


33 posted on 03/07/2005 1:49:05 AM PST by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: blam
Her cap looks woven, doesn't it?

That's her FRO, man.

34 posted on 03/07/2005 2:20:29 AM PST by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: blam

"Venus of Willendorf"

They had McDonald's back then? Or is it possible to get fat without habitually pigging out on junkfood?


35 posted on 03/07/2005 4:33:23 AM PST by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
Ancient ghetto?


36 posted on 03/07/2005 4:37:40 AM PST by Textide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: blam
The article / writer does not take into account the possibility that the paintings, engravings, statuary, etc.. were teaching or memory aids, meant to assist in maintaining the oral tradition..
The important points in the history of a tribe or region may be depicted in this art..
Likewise, certain important principles in performance of the hunt may likewise be portrayed, and these symbols and drawings used to communicate those principles to the neophyte hunters..
In a way, they are the first written language, precursor to pictographs and heiroglyphics..
37 posted on 03/07/2005 9:13:44 AM PST by Drammach (Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
"Black conical hats ..."

Remember that some of the female "Mummies Of Urumchi' wore tall pointed hats.

38 posted on 03/07/2005 11:44:00 AM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: blam
I am not understanding the picture. Is that a modern picture drawn over old etchings to give us an idea of their art or is that actually an ancient picture? It seems like a very good rendition of the animal if it is suppose to be "primitive". Also the rock that the picture is on is in the shape of an the animal. Is this part of the art form? Did they shape the rock to draw the animal on it or draw the animal on a rock that seemed in the shape of the animal to draw attention to the fact? Also what are the etchings behind the picture? Are they the original art or what as they do not look like an animal at all to me?
39 posted on 03/07/2005 10:47:07 PM PST by Bellflower (A new day is Coming!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Please add me to your ping list (so I can catch these articles in a more timely manner.)

Thanks.


40 posted on 03/08/2005 9:56:38 AM PST by Republicanprofessor (10)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson