Posted on 02/27/2005 2:04:04 PM PST by wagglebee
Can someone please explain what Biden is talking about here?
The 14th amendment arguments as liberals see it, I believe are based on the Ninth Amendment: The enumeration of the Constitution, of certain rights , shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people"Keep in mind that these rights must be acquired by legislative process and not activist judges, thus Scalia is much closer to Constitutional reality than whats his face.
Jesse Helms said it would be foolish to give up the filibuster if all conservatives are going to get are Republican judicial appointments in the vein of John Paul Stevens, Sandra Day O'Connor, Anthony Kennedy, and David Souter. None of those four is worth a plug nickel in my book.
From an indisputable source I was told that Biden
graduated very near the bottom of his law school class
at Syracuse...a stupid plagiarist is what he is !
And you base this fact on what?
Gee, does that mean I can tell my daughter that she cannot get a tattoo or multiple body piercings because that would be unconstitutional?
Constitutional "rights" that are NOT in the U.S. Constitution. Biden wants judges who make up Constitutional rights from their feeble minds., ie abortion rights, animal right, ET rights, anything else you can think of ect...
He wants activist judges who can rule anything Constitutional.
Hey Joe Biden! You're the dumbest man in the Senate.
Additional 'Constitutional rights' are done by a legislative process, not by a judicial process. You dumbass.
That is not surprising.
The surprise would be if he supported him.
Ah, it's unconstitutional because you say it is. Thanks for clearing that up.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.