Posted on 02/27/2005 7:07:13 AM PST by 2dogjoe
Exactly. And she'll do it again with the help of her friends in the media. Softball, 'pre-approved' questions with prepared answers. Hillary is calculating and shifty (shifts to the right in her rhetoric). I disagree with those who say she could never win the presidency; I thought she could never 'win' the senate race in New York.
I would never underestimate Hillary, for some of the reasons you mention. On the plus side, Hill can hurt herself in unscripted moments. Her sardonic sense of humor rubs people the wrong way, and she runs her mouth at the wrong times -- as with her recent comments about the new Iraqi gov. Hard to believe she'll avoid these mistakes in a presidential campaign.
What we do need is a strong candidate to go up against her. I adore Condi Rice but think never having run for office is a serious problem. Maybe she'd be good VP material, though.
That and the missing thesis is going to sink schrillary big time.
And don't forget the congenital HEAD BOBBING.
It doesn't matter who Hitlery runs against, as long as the UNIONS are controlled by the Democrats she will win.
Hillary must be passing the crack pipe around again. Delusions of grandeur are the bane of the demo-commies. NSNR.
I agree. Hillary is far and away the front runner for 08. The best way to hurt her chances are to stop her in 06.
I agree. We need someone with polished political skills to beat Hillary. Rudi has the skills, but he will be hardpressed to win the primary being a social liberal. McCain is more likely to blunder than Hillary. I haven't seen enough of the other candidates to say, but I have yet seen a shining star.
It is very dangerous for the GOP to have no presumptive nominee at this point. Hillary is going to be way ahead before the first GOP primary.
Gag me with a spoon...
======
What? WHAT?? You need a spoon to gag? Sheesh... Hitlery wins again !!! ;-))
What she really is is the scariest woman in America. She has more faces than Lon Chaney!
With a Clinton in office, once again, the POTUS will really be, TUPOS (The Ultimate...the rest being your reference to her true nature).
Great, then let her become governor of New York, but she's not going to be able to be President of the United States. There is too much history recorded for her to be able to do that. Just running a few film clips, in her own words, will swiftly take her out.
You are correct; I was hasty. I have the pleasure of working with several normal people from upstate new york (Buffalo, Albany, Rochester, etc.) so I'm accepting of being corrected. However, how could the normal folks put Pataki in? I think I know, given we have the same problem in Illinois....
I disagree. New Yorkers are pushovers. They (at least within the city) elect every socialist and radical leftist in sight, inflicting them on the rest of us. I loved NYC when I visited, but the vaunted "independence" of the New York voter is laughable.
Something quite unusual is happening to Hillary Rodham Clinton
That's right, she's pretending to be a moderate but she's so far left that's she's almost falling off the edge.
Bill was trying to teach her about that but she was con genital. Therefore, Lewinski.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.