Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

(Prince) Charles bemoans 'no compassion' from British public
UK Channel 4 ^ | 2/26/05 | ITN

Posted on 02/26/2005 3:58:41 PM PST by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last
To: CHARLITE

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!

(gasp) that picture...

is it yours?


61 posted on 02/26/2005 5:37:49 PM PST by ariamne (reformed liberal--Shieldmaiden of the Infidel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor

I have no particular love for Prince Charles, but in all fairness, how do we know this is what he actually said? I have seen too many things totally manufactured by the media, and I am highly suspicious of this quote, which seems to be designed to set the people against the prince.


62 posted on 02/26/2005 5:38:25 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: oprahstheantichrist

"She accepted on the basis of a false premise, that Charles cared for her, and it was to be a "normal" marriage."

At the time he did care for her. They had 2 children you know. Must have liked each other a bit at least.


63 posted on 02/26/2005 5:39:36 PM PST by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor
Today's royals are probably no different than their ancestors. What has changed is that now the press does not ignore their behavior.

Same in the US - Kennedy's dalliances would make the cover of the tabloids on a regular basis today.

64 posted on 02/26/2005 5:40:39 PM PST by Churchillspirit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
IMO they should have eloped instead! Princess Di will always be a chain around his neck!!
65 posted on 02/26/2005 5:45:26 PM PST by RoseofTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
"You make my point."

Taking the bait was never so easy, lol...

66 posted on 02/26/2005 5:46:41 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: GSlob
"If there is no reason why he [Charles] should define his private life, then someone else would be doing it for/to him, since nature abhors vacuum. Isn't a 'not' after 'should' missing there?"

Charles wants to have his cake and eat it too while demanding no one take notice.

Nevermind he didn't seem to mind his wedding to Princess Di was the most watched spectacle in human history.

67 posted on 02/26/2005 5:52:06 PM PST by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
Actually, lady, I have read both sides of this issue. And I can't get all worked up over this.

Charles was always in love with Camilla. That is sort of sweet in and of itself. Charles was married to one of the worlds most beautiful women, but still could not love her. He loved Camilla...hello people!

Those who harp on Camilla's looks, should know that when the dashing Prince Phillip married Queen Elizabeth, I can't recall anyone calling her a ravishing beauty, albeit she not unattractive but cute and poised.

I simply think that we shouldn't take what's happening in England so personally. AND those who say Charles hasn't done anything with his life, are the same ones who want Prince William to take the rightful place of Charles in succession. So WHAT has Prince William accomplished? Nothing yet.

Charles and Camilla should live happilly ever after with what little time they both have left.

sw

68 posted on 02/26/2005 5:52:36 PM PST by spectre (Spectre's wife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Charles, you were married to Diana Spencer and you cheated on her with...Camilla Parker-Bowles. You were married to Diana Spencer and you divorced her for...Camilla Parker-Bowles. Let's set aside the potential moral/legal conflicts inherent in a divorced English sovereign serving ex officio as the governor of a church that does not accept divorce. I suggest that any man who would trade in Diana Spencer for...Camilla Parker-Bowles...is simply too stupid to be allowed to accede to the throne.
69 posted on 02/26/2005 5:56:29 PM PST by RichInOC (...oops, did I post that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Claptrap Charlie and his mongrel Rottweiler Classless Camilla are reprehensible individuals. The people know these two are morons. Claptrap Charlie and Classless Camilla should remember the old adage: You can fool all of the people some of the time, and some of the people all of the time, but you can't fool all the people all of the time.


70 posted on 02/26/2005 6:17:07 PM PST by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47; Hillary's Lovely Legs

If you seriously believe Charles and Camilla were not carrying on (and I do mean sleeping together) after Camilla was married, then you really must see some swampland in Florida that I'd like to offload for a small fortune.


71 posted on 02/26/2005 6:17:33 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
What a stupid smear attempt

Nice catch. The British press is notorious.

72 posted on 02/26/2005 6:17:38 PM PST by GVnana (If I had a Buckhead moment would I know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple

that was my point


73 posted on 02/26/2005 6:21:03 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

This is rich! Prince Charles didn't show Princess Diana much compassion during their marriage.


74 posted on 02/26/2005 6:22:11 PM PST by Clintonfatigued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Churchillspirit

that was my point, too


75 posted on 02/26/2005 6:22:46 PM PST by Endeavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

>"My private life has become an industry. People are making >money out of it," he complained.

Well then quit your 'job' as royalty, get a job and support yourself and your hunny. Then you do what you please without any qualms.

You are a kept man and the mistress of the British citizenry that support you and your lifestyle. A lifestyle many will never experience at all.


76 posted on 02/26/2005 6:24:40 PM PST by sandbar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
It's a lot like hitting yourself with a hammer, Charlie, because it feels good when you stop.
77 posted on 02/26/2005 6:27:30 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
I thought divorce (condemned by a mere Jesus Christ but approved by Henry VIII) was the whole reason for the existence of the Charch of England.
78 posted on 02/26/2005 6:30:55 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Endeavor

"then you really must see some swampland in Florida that I'd like to offload for a small fortune."

Geez, why do so many keep using the trite sell you swampland line. It's so overused. Come up with something more original. By the way, I disagree with you.


79 posted on 02/26/2005 6:32:06 PM PST by flaglady47
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Cultural Jihad
Well...would you have wanted to argue the point with the big fella?
80 posted on 02/26/2005 6:34:32 PM PST by RichInOC (thwack...THUNK!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-117 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson