Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prosecutor argues seizure of Rush Limbaugh's medical records fair
South Florid Sun-Sentinel / AP ^ | February 14 2005, 4:00 PM EST | Jill Barton

Posted on 02/14/2005 1:34:15 PM PST by rface

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-270 last
To: RS
You seem to be really up on that case. Are you in that area?

I knew the Palm Beach County prosecutor, at the time of the Kennedy Smith trial, (actually knew his family as he was a little older than me). He grew up in Defuniak Spgs.

261 posted on 02/16/2005 2:09:11 PM PST by yarddog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: yarddog

"You seem to be really up on that case. Are you in that area?"

Nope, just followed it from the beginning - In the first few days my "truth detector" was screaming like it hadn't done since Stephanopolis was Clintons Press Lacky.
As time went on, the "defence" was the same as other criminals... attack the law, attack the cops, claim political bias, let your lawyer do the talking (lieing) for you on the talk show circuit.
I did think it was amusing when Rush read his lawyers statement regarding his innocence on the air instead of saying his own words.


262 posted on 02/16/2005 2:38:00 PM PST by RS (just because they are out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: RS

So, RS, are YOU a "retired" cop? What's your disability? Stress? Bad back from curling too many Dunkies? Hmmm?

The really amusing thing about the disability fraud epidemic is that it will give people good reason to hang around cops' houses with video cameras. There are some SWEET bounties for uncovering fraud, too.


263 posted on 02/16/2005 4:51:45 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies]

To: eno_

Gee...reading an awful lot into my short remark...I don't think I was commenting on political theory about limited government. Catch ya next time.


264 posted on 02/16/2005 5:04:30 PM PST by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: eno_

"So, RS, are YOU a "retired" cop? What's your disability? Stress? Bad back from curling too many Dunkies? Hmmm? "

LOL - lost all my fingers - wore them down to the bone posting here during work hours....


265 posted on 02/16/2005 5:47:31 PM PST by RS (just because they are out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 263 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota

Well, back at law school, if they asked you the following questions, what would you have said:

a) Is the government authorized to restrict your right to keep and bear arms?

b) Is the governmet authorized to restrict your right to travel?

c) Why does one need an amendment, and the other doesn't?

For extra credit, what does "bear arms" mean to you, and what laws can you think of that JUST MIGHT be unconstitutional?


266 posted on 02/16/2005 6:11:06 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: LachlanMinnesota
I don't think I was commenting on political theory about limited government.

That's how lawyers think of the Constiution these days: Just an esoteric theory. Not applicable to day to day affairs.

267 posted on 02/16/2005 6:12:25 PM PST by eno_ (Freedom Lite, it's almost worth defending.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: RS

First of all, I don't believe that it's an "act of desperation" for a defendant and his attorneys to exhaust all legal means to frustrate an indictment, especially if they believe that Florida law may have been violated in pursuit of that indictment. Secondly my use of the words "rightfully demand", as in "the worst punishment they could rightfully demand", does not refer to the prosecutor's options under the law, but to the selective (and political) nature of this attempted prosecution. A policeman may have the "right" under the law to arrest me for spitting on the sidewalk, but if he has only warned and never arrested others for spitting on the sidewalk, and if his mother thinks I'm an evil Republican who deserves to be arrested on general principles, then it's likely that the cop in question is selectively enforcing the law. As to your observation, "Since it's allready (already) gotten tossed up to the FlA SC, just how can they "overplay" their hand ?", obviously there are Federal courts beyond Florida, and there is the court of public opinion which (one may hope) might motivate Jeb Bush (or, if it came to that, his brother) to issue a pardon based on the political nature of the prosecution, and the known political proclivities of the FLA SC.


268 posted on 02/16/2005 8:38:08 PM PST by pawdoggie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 258 | View Replies]

To: pawdoggie

"First of all, I don't believe that it's an "act of desperation" for a defendant and his attorneys to exhaust all legal means to frustrate an indictment, especially if they believe that Florida law may have been violated in pursuit of that indictment."

The "act of desperation" comes into play when you are willing to pay millions to keep records that "will prove your innocence" from EVER being opened.

Secondly, cops issue a lot of warnings and a lot of tickets... so ?


"... obviously there are Federal courts beyond Florida, and there is the court of public opinion which (one may hope) might motivate Jeb Bush (or, if it came to that, his brother) to issue a pardon based on the political nature of the prosecution,"

The Fla Constitution regarding this must be constuded in accordance with the US Constitution which allows search warrants.

LOL - Just what is Jeb Bush going to pardon Rush FOR ? This is an investigation that is being blocked. Will he issue a blanket pardon for ANY illegal activities that Rush may have committed regarding his illegal drug use ?
Shades of Clinton !
Do you seriously think that Jeb would destroy his political career for Rush ?


269 posted on 02/17/2005 7:35:14 AM PST by RS (just because they are out to get him doesn't mean he's not guilty)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 268 | View Replies]

To: rface
The problem with this so far manufactured case against Rush Limbaugh which has cost taxpayers all kinds of money and still no charges have been filed for anything and it appears the prosecution needs to go against Florida State Law to try to find something they wish they could, Rush Limbaugh has moved on; cured himself; still is making lots of money and intellectual and political impact; while his advertisers are also making bundles of profits and his loyal listeners are growing in numbers and satisfaction.

In fact, Rush's popularity has soared while the case against him has soured.

270 posted on 02/18/2005 8:04:22 PM PST by harpo11
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-270 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson