Skip to comments.
Democrats praise Iraq's elections
CNN ^
| 30 January 2005
| CNN
Posted on 01/30/2005 9:10:46 AM PST by kipita
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Democrats praised Iraq's nationwide elections as "a great day for many."
But Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri, speaking on behalf of the Democratic Party in Saturday's weekly radio address, warned the outcome of Sunday's vote may be skewed in favor of the country's Shiite majority and "will likely not be completely representative of all ethnic and religious groups."
"The Shia will likely control a significant majority of assembly seats, with considerable Kurdish participation," he said. "The Sunnis, on the other hand, are likely to be underrepresented and may denounce the legitimacy of the new government."
(Excerpt) Read more at us.cnn.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: dems; elections; iraq; iraqielection; praise; radioaddress; skelton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-57 next last
But still there's deadhead politics involved.
1
posted on
01/30/2005 9:10:47 AM PST
by
kipita
To: kipita
I have been watching these people all morning. You can actually see them swallow hard as the bile comes up in their throat when voicing words of praise for the elections.
2
posted on
01/30/2005 9:12:31 AM PST
by
speed_addiction
(Ninja's last words, "Hey guys. Watch me just flip out on that big dude over there!")
To: kipita
Was he the only rat politician available who wasn't in mourning, wearing black or crying their eyes out?
3
posted on
01/30/2005 9:12:55 AM PST
by
Caipirabob
(Democrats.. Socialists..Commies..Traitors...Who can tell the difference?)
To: kipita
"The Shia will likely control a significant majority of assembly seats, with considerable Kurdish participation," he said. "The Sunnis, on the other hand, are likely to be underrepresented and may denounce the legitimacy of the new government." LOL. Taken straight from the 2000 and 2004 DNC post election talking points....
4
posted on
01/30/2005 9:13:31 AM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: kipita
Rep. Ike SkeltonAny relation to Red?
To: kipita
skewed in favor of the country's Shiite majority That's what usually happens when a majority votes, DUH.
6
posted on
01/30/2005 9:15:55 AM PST
by
1066AD
To: kipita
There was very little praise and a whole lot of criticism in his statement.
But what else should I expect from the Anti-America Party?
7
posted on
01/30/2005 9:16:45 AM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: kipita
...will likely not be completely representative of all ethnic and religious groups." This could be applied to the US election in that the democraps, being a minority group, are not properly represented because the VOTERS VOTED!
To: kipita
The dems have changed "a chicken in every pot" to "a worm in every apple"...
To: kipita
Anything less than complete perfection will elicit the proverbial "BUT" from these people. I recommend a serious reading of the history of Democracies for these people - Perfection is never attained and, in the beginning stages, chaos is more the order of the day (And that aptly describes the American Experience). By comparison, the Iraq elections are a model of stability and IMO represents an excellent start to this sometimes awkward process.
10
posted on
01/30/2005 9:19:08 AM PST
by
drt1
To: kipita
"The Sunnis, on the other hand, are likely to be underrepresented and may denounce the legitimacy of the new government." If they are underrepresented, that is a problem within the Sunni community, not with the voting system. In typical Dem fashion, "unfairness" is always seen as the result of external factors.
To: kipita
"a great day for many." I'm so tired of this amorphous "many" they always spout about in order not to be specific, or to obfuscate how "many" there are. Katie Couric is the queen of this, with her constant questions beginning with "Many people say ..."
12
posted on
01/30/2005 9:19:37 AM PST
by
JennysCool
(I was so naive as a kid I used to sneak behind the barn and do nothing. -Johnny Carson)
To: TADSLOS
Well, if they decide not to vote, then the fools don't have much of a leg to stand on when they complain about being underrepresented in the government, now do they?
The Sunnis didn't have a problem with the vast majority of the Iraqi people being completely un-represented in the government when Saddam and his Ba'athist thugs were in power.
13
posted on
01/30/2005 9:19:54 AM PST
by
AQGeiger
(The liberals say every vote counts...except in Iraq and Afghanistan.)
To: WestTexasWend
The dems have changed "a chicken in every pot" to "a worm in every apple"...May I use this in my tagline?
14
posted on
01/30/2005 9:19:56 AM PST
by
Dog
To: Semper Paratus
A majority of socialist democrats are related to "Red" but not as in Red Skelton.
15
posted on
01/30/2005 9:20:30 AM PST
by
F.J. Mitchell
(Winning wars was easier before the Democrats and their MSM switched sides.)
To: drt1
To: kipita
I would like to see the Senate Republicans introduce a resolution commending President Bush for bringing democratic elections to Iraq, so that the liberals can make fools of themselves by voting against it.
17
posted on
01/30/2005 9:21:16 AM PST
by
djpg
To: kipita
"Sunday's vote may be skewed in favor of the country's Shiite majority "
Well, would this idiot expect the outcome to favor the minority?
18
posted on
01/30/2005 9:21:18 AM PST
by
babygene
(Viable after 87 trimesters)
To: kipita
19
posted on
01/30/2005 9:21:33 AM PST
by
paul51
(11 September 2001 - Never forget)
To: kipita
He doesn't mention the fact that the Iraqi's now have to draw up a Constitution that will be voted on in several months. If 3 provinces turn it down, they start over. So the Sunni's will be protected.
Another clown from the Skelton family tree.
To: Semper Paratus
I checked his website, didn't mention any relation to Red.
I sure hope not, I loved Red the best of any entertainer!
21
posted on
01/30/2005 9:23:10 AM PST
by
clyde260
(Public Enemy #1: Network News!)
To: AQGeiger
The Sunnis didn't have a problem with the vast majority of the Iraqi people being completely un-represented in the government when Saddam and his Ba'athist thugs were in power 'Xactly. Life's a bitch when you're no longer the minority ruling the majority by oppression.
22
posted on
01/30/2005 9:23:19 AM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: kipita
The fact that this election has come off better than anyone thought is a horrible thought to the Democrats.
The fact that millions of Iraqi's would brave death to be able to vote has to jolt the Democrats and everything they have been saying since we went into Iraq.
The fact is the Democrats wanted this election to fail and for the body count to be as high as possible to try and force Bush to retreat from Iraq.
Now that the opposite has happened what are the Democrats going to say now? I know they won't eat their words so the next line of attack has to be that the poor Sunni's did not get a fair shake in the election and that makes the whole thing wrong.
It is an inspiring sight to see all those people brave death and destruction to vote. The Terrorists have failed and I hope this is a nail in their coffins.
To: djpg
I would like to see the Senate Republicans introduce a resolution commending President Bush for bringing democratic elections to Iraq, so that the liberals can make fools of themselves by voting against it.
A most excellent idea.
To: kipita
I see twice as much criticism as praise.
I can't wait to see what Ted Kennedy mumbles/slurs about the election.
25
posted on
01/30/2005 9:24:18 AM PST
by
airborne
(Dear Lord, please be with my family in Iraq. Keep them close to You and safely in Your arms.)
To: kipita
The minority Sunni Arabs dominated under Saddam's rule but fear the election will benefit the majority Shiites. Skelton, the ranking Democrat on the House Armed Services Committee, said if Shiites do win a majority, "it will be tempting to question what we could have done differently for the last two years that would have yielded a better outcome."
This ranks as one of the stupidest statements on the subject I have heard.
What does he think the outcome should be,a distinct minority that abused power when they held it by force elected by a large majority that opposed them.
Oh,I just remembered dems think that any election that does`nt come out the way they wanted it to,in this case a bloodbath to wave at President Bush,should be called illegitimate.
26
posted on
01/30/2005 9:24:30 AM PST
by
carlr
To: Semper Paratus
No relation..
Ike Skelton is a "conservative" democrat..
He was probably one of the few Dems that could discuss the election without breaking down and crying..
Skelton is largely pro-gun, and NOT your run-of-the-mill "dimocrat" politician..
And he's been there a long, long, time..
27
posted on
01/30/2005 9:26:00 AM PST
by
Drammach
(Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
To: kipita
Wow. This article gets the "Damning But" in by the 12th word of the article. You gotta -try- to get it in that early.
Qwinn
28
posted on
01/30/2005 9:26:12 AM PST
by
Qwinn
To: drt1
Anything less than complete perfection will elicit the proverbial "BUT" from these people. I recommend a serious reading of the history of Democracies for these people - Perfection is never attained and, in the beginning stages, chaos is more the order of the day (And that aptly describes the American Experience). By comparison, the Iraq elections are a model of stability and IMO represents an excellent start to this sometimes awkward process.Exactly! And they don't have what it takes to do anything, they just comment on what others do. Very un-American.
29
posted on
01/30/2005 9:26:40 AM PST
by
kipita
(Rebel – the proletariat response to Aristocracy and Exploitation.)
To: kipita
I'm still waiting for a comment from Chappy Ted. I'm sure this is a sad, sad day for him.
30
posted on
01/30/2005 9:27:51 AM PST
by
LisaMalia
(Thanks to our troops, FREEDOM RINGS IN IRAQ!)
To: Drammach
Oh, yeah..
He's from Missouri..
31
posted on
01/30/2005 9:27:59 AM PST
by
Drammach
(Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
To: speed_addiction
I thought Kerry was going to choke on his bile on "Meet The Press." This is a Grand Election, an overwhelming success for the Iraqi people, for the Middle East, and for the World and Congratulations to Our Great President who had the will,the strength. the leadership, and the vision to carry this great freeing of a great Country from a horrible, murderous tyrant.And all Kerry could say is"the wrong war at the wrong time in the wrong place," for shame on him!
To: kipita
What a dishonest article. Notice they don't attribute the quote supposedly from "democrats" (plural, no less) and the only attribution is to a "but" negative.
We have been watching Iraqi election coverage since last night and the dems (media and politicians alike) have most certainly been hyping the negative.
To: kipita
Hey Ike--the Shiites--they are a considerable majority.
If they win it may be because--they a majority.
Apparently, the Rats are numerically-challenged in many ways apparently.
34
posted on
01/30/2005 9:29:01 AM PST
by
rod1
(uired 4 more hours).)
To: kipita
But Rep. Ike Skelton of Missouri, speaking on behalf of the Democratic Party in Saturday's weekly radio address, warned the outcome of Sunday's vote may be skewed in favor of the country's Shiite majority and "will likely not be completely representative of all ethnic and religious groups." "The Shia will likely control a significant majority of assembly seats, with considerable Kurdish participation," he said. "The Sunnis, on the other hand, are likely to be underrepresented and may denounce the legitimacy of the new government." The Democrats, pining for the poor Sunnis ... who, like them, are not smart enough to belong in democratic politics.
If the Sunnis are missing out on anything in Iraq, it is their own damn fault.
35
posted on
01/30/2005 9:29:35 AM PST
by
spodefly
(Yo, homey ... Is that my briefcase?)
To: carlr
Yes - The part of the statement "Would have yielded a better outcome" is telling. What IS a "Better outcome" other than that obtained by a free people who are empowered to freely vote. Apparently the Dems feel this possible outcome can somehow be improved upon, the Elites who actually mistrust the people that they are.
36
posted on
01/30/2005 9:30:02 AM PST
by
drt1
To: speed_addiction
This Skelton comment is really too stupid to comment on, but here goes anyway. Skelton's insinuation seems to be that the majority should not rule--funny, but that seems to be the dim damn Dem view of politics. If a minority pouts and says it was disenfranchised, pull the plug.
Arrrggggh! The Sunni MINORITY ruled for thirty years. Time to listen to the majority of the people.
vaudine
37
posted on
01/30/2005 9:30:15 AM PST
by
vaudine
To: djpg
To: TADSLOS
This election should be a great inspiration for all of us. That there are politicians that choose to nit pick instead of celebrate this victory of democracy over tyranny concerns me.
39
posted on
01/30/2005 9:30:41 AM PST
by
oldbrowser
(You lost the election...........get over it)
To: LisaMalia
40
posted on
01/30/2005 9:30:44 AM PST
by
Drammach
(Freedom; not just a job, it's an adventure..)
To: kipita
Democrats suck.
Iraq is holding better elections than those held in RAT dominated Washington state.
Ted Kennedy can take the rest of his party to Hell, it's the only place they belong.
To: WestTexasWend
The dems have changed "a chicken in every pot" to "a worm in every apple"... Perfect analysis except where it pertains to them (re: Gregoire wins 3rd recount). If events do not further their political goals as viewed through their political filter, then the news is bad or suspect. Even when events result in a new democracy in the world.
What a pitiful way to live. Hope of failure can not long be sustained in a person with freedom.
Politics has truly become the liberal's religion and reason for existence and they can not separate events of every day life from it. I predict Liberal Fatwa's and martyrdom in our near future. We have already seen the beginning of this with the Red State boycotts and such. All they need is a strong Ayatollah to coalesce their pessimism.
42
posted on
01/30/2005 9:35:49 AM PST
by
watchinginawe
("I AM THAT I AM."...God)
To: kipita
"will likely not be completely representative of all ethnic and religious groups"
Another Sad-Damn supporter!
43
posted on
01/30/2005 9:36:28 AM PST
by
F105-D ThunderChief
(That "THUD" you heard was the Collapse of the DemocRats!)
To: oldbrowser
That there are politicians that choose to nit pick instead of celebrate this victory of democracy over tyranny concerns me. That's because there are leftist politicians, self appointed socialist meddlers and an elitist liberal media around the globe who are more interested in re-gaining power than they are acknowledging the rightiousness of a democratic process. After all, they know what's good for the rest of us and we are all basking in ignorance. Just ask them.
44
posted on
01/30/2005 9:38:17 AM PST
by
TADSLOS
(Right Wing Infidel since 1954)
To: TADSLOS
That's because there are leftist politicians, self appointed socialist meddlers and an elitist liberal media around the globe who are more interested in re-gaining power than they are acknowledging the rightiousness of a democratic process. After all, they know what's good for the rest of us and we are all basking in ignorance. Just ask them.And what makes America different (unique in the world) is that we are the opposite of that constituency. Give us your weak, impoverished, common folk..................but keep your dam elitists within your own dam country.
45
posted on
01/30/2005 9:46:54 AM PST
by
kipita
(Rebel – the proletariat response to Aristocracy and Exploitation.)
To: Drammach
Thanks for passing that thread along to me. I had missed it. Priceless!
46
posted on
01/30/2005 9:47:53 AM PST
by
LisaMalia
(Thanks to our troops, FREEDOM RINGS IN IRAQ!)
To: clyde260
I didn't think that Skelton was Red's real last name, so I looked it up and was surprised to learn that it is/ Richard Skelton.
BUT do you know who Leslie Lynch King, Jr. is?
Or Anne Frances Robbins?
Go here:
http://www.celebrityalmanac.com/real.shtml
(Anne Francis Robbins is NOT the well know singer Ann Francis.)
47
posted on
01/30/2005 9:54:18 AM PST
by
Graybeard58
(Remember and pray for Spec.4 Matt Maupin - MIA/POW- Iraq since 04/09/04)
To: kipita
In my suggestion that these dark cloud seekers revisit a little history on the implementation of Democracies I neglected to mention the Post WWII experiences in Germany and Japan. Some of the same problems were present, a politically disenfranchised electorate, persistent insurgencies, destroyed economies, etc.
It took between 7 and 10 years before these burdened countries were able to accomplish free elections and - Look at the results! No, despite the negative tone of the opponents of US policy in Iraq, this is a great milestone in the Iraq/Middle East progress. And, in proper perspective, it is occurring at relative lightning speed.
48
posted on
01/30/2005 10:35:27 AM PST
by
drt1
To: kipita
Bull. They are bandwagon jumpers of the worst kind. I used to be a Democrat, and believe me--they are NOT the kind of people we want running the country.
49
posted on
01/30/2005 10:42:38 AM PST
by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: kipita
Democrats praised Iraq's nationwide elections as "a great day for many."..... for public consumption, they did.
The true thoughts of the Democrats can be seen at Democrat Underground, where they are gnashing their teeth and giving terrorists tactical advice.
Seriously.
50
posted on
01/30/2005 10:44:29 AM PST
by
Lazamataz
(Proudly Posting Without Reading the Article Since 1999!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-50, 51-57 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson