Posted on 01/11/2005 4:36:32 PM PST by LauraleeBraswell
Did you miss that headline in the news last week? Well, that's because no one ran it.
Ingmar Guandique, a violent Salvadoran national who is serving a 10-year sentence for assaulting two female joggers in Washington's Rock Creek Park last year, was interrogated recently as part of the investigation into the intern murder mystery. But in my review of all 115 news items archived in the Lexis-Nexis database that mention Guandique in connection with the Levy case, not a single story referred to his status as a criminal illegal alien.
(Excerpt) Read more at townhall.com ...
I'm not sure how seriously anyone though Condit killed her. Seemed to me the consensus was simply he is a scummy guy who deserved whatever treatment he got. I don't think he has suffered too terribly.
OTOH, I am really tired of facts being 'conveniently' omitted from the news.
First of all Condit is a scum bag. Just because he didn't commit murder and sometimes voted the right way, doesn't make him praisworthy. The Dems may overlook KKK membership as long as someone votes their agenda, but we shouldn't stoop that low.
Also, haven't you heard. There are no illegal aliens, only the documentationally challenged.
The Democratic Leadership was out to get him, I truly believe that.
He was a Democrat who sided with the Republican party on allot of issues. So, they got rid of him.
No, he was hardly a Democrat. He sided with the Republican party a bit too much.
Really, isn't it funny how mainstream media just JUMPED on that story?
Right, but, before the district shifted, a new election could have enabled a Republican to win...
So it swung both ways.
condidit:
| To find all articles tagged or indexed using condidit, click below: | ||||
| click here >>> | condidit | <<< click here | ||
| (To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) | ||||
Thanks!
Quote: He was a Democrat who sided with the Republican party on allot of issues. So, they got rid of him.
Sorry, I doubt if they killed her to get rid of him. My local Rep was run out of office several years ago by his party by not giving him any money and helping out his same party competitor. Simple.
You bet- there are links there that I suspect most folks have forgotten about. It's quite a mess.
Michelle ping
What a lot of folks do not realize is that the democrap leadership started and staffed the KKK. Republicans were not complicent of either starting or staffing the klan. All the congressmen and supreme court judges in our history that were klan were demoncrappers!!! The dems are the scum that are keeping the REAL news from the American people. Oh yeah, the dems started the Civil War that kept the South in economic distress for a hundred years.-An Alabama Lincoln-Reagan Republican.
Whether Chandra belongs to the Clinton 'body count'; the Clinton 'scorecard' ; or is a 'score' for Condit, has yet to be answered. . .and maybe never will. . .but political life - so to speak. . .surely did Chandra in.
That really doesn't make sense, Condit was from a conservative district in California and Dems would have nothing to gain by his defeat.
Good point.
But, I said before Condit voted for the impeachment of Clinton and often sided with Republican policies. He was a Democrat in name only.
He didn't help their cause and probably hindered it.
I thought they redrew the District and had a Democrat in there there now.
There's not a hair of evidence on Condit.
It can't be pointed out often enough that the Klu Klux Klan was almost entirely Democrat. The Jim Crow laws were passed and enforced by Democrats. Those fellows in the fifties who set the dogs on black protestes were all Democrats.
Why isnt this generally known? Because the news media are fully owned subsidiaries of the Democrats, and the people who teach American history in our schools are all leftists.
He did not vote for impeachment. There were Four Articles voted on in the House and Condit voted "Nay" on each and every one.
I must ask why you are posting such disinformatoin and to what purpose?
Just setting the record straight.
Impeachment inquiry, sorry. Still, on other issues he sided Conservative.
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=23741
The Democrats HATED him...
Fox News
7th paragraph from Bottom
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,28021,00.html
Funny, I was replying to you on the other thread.
I cannot stand misinformation too.
I would like to say that I firmly believe the Democratic party's leadership was out to sink Condit. And this siduation was so conveinent.
First Article; Condit NAY
Second Article; Condit NAY
Third Article; Condit NAY
Fourth Article; Condit NAY
And your point is...?????????
What "other issues" and what does that have to do with anything?
I addressed a specific point of disinformation that you have taken upon yourself to spread hither and yon.
How he ranked on the "other issues" is completely irrelevant.
Condit was replaced by Cardoza who is a member of the "Blue Dog Coalition", a group of 35 Democrats who are Conservative, so there probably isn't much change there. 31 Democrat Congressmen voted for impeachment along with Republicans, why would Condit be singled out?
You must be talking about a congressman, right?
No, it is relevent. And you asked me where I got my source of information. I gave it to, FOX news, it's right there.
The "Democrats" got rid of Condit because he was revealed to be a serial sexual abuser whose defense that it was a matter only of ministering to the needs of emotionally-arrested young women and/or was simply the strictly private matter of private consensual sex between adults did not wash with the party of ..... um ..... the Cli'tons.
As far as Condit's allegedly being a "conservative" Democrat, don't buy the hype. Condit did what it took to get elected, but he was a politician through-and through. He was thick as thieves with gray Davis, and before they both fell from grace, Davis was setting Condit up to be the next governor.
As far as clearing Condit of the Levy murder, that is ridiculous. There is no reason to move his name from the suspect list and every reason to keep him there. There may never be enough evidence to charge anyone in this crime, but it doesn't mean someone isn't guilty. I have never heared anything publicly that exculpated Condit, and I think that such information would have leaked.
No doubt, Guandique is the poster child for immigration reform, but that doesn't mean he murdered Chandra Levy. He passed a lie detector tests that sought to determine if he was involved in her murder. And as far as I know, the circumstances of her murder didn't match his M.O.
I live in California. Before Chandra Levy disappeared the Democrats did not have any grudge against Condit. In fact, he was the closest politician in the whole state to the highest-ranking Democrat in the state, Gray Davis. He was Davis' boy, and he was viewed as having a sky-is-the-limit future. For most of the summer elected Democrats were defending him, including Nancy Pelosi and Dianne Feinstein. But by the end of the summer, he was hurting the party nationally. Even then they didn't attack him, they just let him wither away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.