Posted on 01/10/2005 10:01:10 AM PST by churchillbuff
Read down to item linked to USA Today:
Peter Johnson reports "Nightline" just notched its lowest number of average viewers ever, from a high in 1993 of 6.2 million to a low last year of 3.7 million. The same is true for Sunday public affairs show "This Week," with a high of 4.9 million in 1993 compared with 2.5 million last year, behind No. 1 NBC's "Meet the Press" (4.3 million) and CBS' "Face the Nation" (3.8 million).
(Excerpt) Read more at poynter.org ...
That "episode" got nice numbers.
I stumbled across "This Week" on Sunday while reprogramming a new universal remote control. Hadn't watched in years.
Couldn't believe how the show's quality has fallen. Too many lispy young punk "commentators" a la Georgie Boy Snuffaluffagus.
credilbility
when you shovel manure, no one wants to hang around
and like SeeBS, NYT, LAT et al; they will all go their graves in denial...
I think Ted needs to talk to Traficant about improving his rug.
I can't believe Ted Krapple is still on the air.
YAY!!!!!!!
Ditto. I didn't know Nightline was still on.
Not o kill joy the collective mood - but the result of low ratings has little to do with the conservatives striking back and Nightline or This Week - butthe fact that the ABC network's weak ratings of its lead ins. David Letterman also suffered from this at CBS - also - Disney which owns ABC is not promotingthe hsow to its affiliates - Disney wants to scrap Nightline and go for a its own late night talk show. Lastly, network ratinsg -while still far larger than cable TV are slipping all the time do to competing mediums like the internet and video games. All the networks want to get out of the news business - news broadcasts being something they had to have during regulation but no longer required.
This is VERY suprising... I didn't realize they were still doing these shows.......
Not o kill joy the collective mood - but the result of low ratings has little to do with the conservatives striking back and Nightline or This Week - butthe fact that the ABC network's weak ratings of its lead ins. David Letterman also suffered from this at CBS - also - Disney which owns ABC is not promoting the shows to its affiliates - Disney wants to scrap Nightline and go for a its own late night talk show. Lastly, network ratings -while still far larger than cable TV are slipping all the time due to competing mediums like the Internet and video games. All the networks want to get out of the news business - news broadcasts being something they had to have during regulation but no longer required.
The demise of biased network news programs is welcomed for any reason. It is true that network news in general may be going the way of the manual typewriter. I hope that whatever replaces it will serve the American people more honorably and truthfully.
Jimmy Kimmel?
I care not for the reasons,
just the results.
Say goodnight Ted!
Media Schadenfreude and Media Shenanigans PING
Ted's dead weasel toupee makes Traficant's dead weasel look grand.
"All the networks want to get out of the news business"
At least they want to do the right thing.
Maybe 2005 will be the year that Ted, Blather, Jennings say goodbye and join Brokaw and Cronkite at Camp We Don't Want You Anymore!
I haven't been able to watch This Week since George took over. I object to his use on moral grounds. He's a Clinton crony! That alone should have eliminated him as a viable host of this "journalist" program. I could barely watch it when Choke-Me & Mr Spock were co-hosts. I miss David Brinkley.
I would have to be held at gun point with one of my loved ones kidnapped to get me to watch the arrogant/smug Jennings.
Only to be replaced by Jon Stewart, Greg Kinnear, Tina Fey and a whole slew of new infotaintainment talking heads moving into the "broadcast journalism" sphere along side former politicos/soon to be anchors like Chris Matthews and George Stephanopolous.
Hey, you can't take their partisanship "seriously", it is satire. If their facts are wrong (as with Michael Moore), you just aren't understanding their "op ed pieces".
These satire instead of news will continue to lose audiences and advertising $'s/advertisers regardless of the new or semi new liberal talking heads.
Eventually, they will come to a brief news recap at the top of the hour and at the half hour. Breaking news will be trailers on the bottom of the screen.
When the advertisers find discover that they get more bang with their ad $'s in reality shows and quiz shows, the evening Not News is finished.
Ah but "satirical" shows like SNL will continue to air 5 minute "press conferences" from candidate Bush so that they can shove every DNC talking point into his mouth.
The line between entertainment and "politically pointed" programming will blur just as nightly news will "lighten up" the way morning news has.
LOL! It took me several computational cycles to figure out that you were talking about Coke-Me Dilberts. Nice word picture. It fits her like a glove.
I might have given Sam and Cokie three weeks after Brinkley stepped down.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.