Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Democrats United in Plans To Block Top Bush Initiatives
washingtonpost.com ^ | Monday, January 10, 2005 | Dan Balz

Posted on 01/09/2005 7:57:44 PM PST by crushelits

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last
To: bitt

I think it will be GOPers who wind up blocking Bush's major initiatives.
There are people like Lugar and McCain who are doing everything they can to undermine him in Iraq (might add Lindsay Graham to that).
The entire Buchanan wing of the party won't even discuss options for border security.
And there are a lot who don't want to touch Social Security or permanent tax cuts.
He might get GOP agreement on tort reform, and if that's all he gets, at least it's something.


21 posted on 01/09/2005 8:26:56 PM PST by speekinout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt

This is another example of why you must kill your enemies when you defeat them. It shuts them up, it firms up your base, and it brings in all those people who were wavering.


22 posted on 01/09/2005 8:27:47 PM PST by ReadyNow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Their purpose is strictly POWER AND CONTROL. They are worthless, other than to themselves. The Repubs continue to give them a free pass with no attacks and no visble hard-core attacks in the conservative media...the libs will live as long as conservatives continue to wimp-out on them.


23 posted on 01/09/2005 8:29:52 PM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
The headline is not exactly a light bulb moment.

But the unity of purpose also underscores a hardening of attitudes among Democrats -- from elected officials and strategists to grass-roots activists and party constituencies -- that Bush's domestic agenda presents opportunities to divide the GOP, break apart Bush's winning coalition and recapture some of the voters who supported Bush last fall.

Aside from immigration, there is nothing on his domestic schedule the majority who voted for him are opposed to in principle. S.S. reform, tax reform, tort reform, constitutional judges, etc... all are widely accepted. And, Democrats have no credibility on immigration anymore than the Reps do.

Among GOP elected officials, there may be a divide. People that do not want to buck the status quo and those that live off pork themselves may not be in agreement but the base is. I assume Bush understands this, which is why he's planning to take these reforms to the people much in the way he did his tax cuts. He's going to get the American people to pressure these House and Congress. I still remember the shock and fury when he urged people on the trail to contact their representatives about tax cuts. LOL

Frankly, the Dems are insane. I cannot predict what insanity will drive people to do. If they are still capable of rational thought, they'll bluster in the media but jump on these reforms if the legislation is good and looks to pass. They'll want credit, even if they opposed all along the way. In the same manner they wish to claim welfare reform. "Red" state Dems will have their futures to worry about, and may jump ship.

Clearly the Boxer Rebellion indicates they are still dedicated to kissing up to the Moore base, but they remain self serving politicians so we'll see if their actions mirror their bluster of words in the end.

24 posted on 01/09/2005 8:50:30 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

So NOW they are united huh? What were they last year? They threw everything at Bush and still lost. Sorry 'Rats resistance is futile!


25 posted on 01/09/2005 8:51:17 PM PST by darkmatter (Let them hate. As long as they fear.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BoBToMatoE

This is too funny. Watching the rats is like watching the energizer bunny run into a brick wall over and over and over and.......


26 posted on 01/09/2005 8:57:18 PM PST by lizma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Bush and the Republicans would do best to simply ignore the minority party like parents ignore a tired, cranky child. Maybe a little spanking now and then, and then put them to bed. Seeking "bipartisan cooperation" is a waste of time with those sick animals.


27 posted on 01/09/2005 9:02:58 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

28 posted on 01/09/2005 9:15:31 PM PST by Sender (Team Infidel USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

That's great! Another party wide temper tantrum. If they don't want to deal - nuclear option. It's constitutional, and it would benefit our nation for generations to come.


29 posted on 01/09/2005 9:21:16 PM PST by superskunk (Quinn's Law: Liberalism always produces the exact opposite of it's stated intent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
And of course, the press will say the gridlock is due to lack of "bipartisanship" on the part of the Republicans.

And we all know "bipartisanship" means both parties join together to screw the Republicans.

30 posted on 01/09/2005 9:22:16 PM PST by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
The whole dem strategy is to use the media to stampede frightened RINO's into blocking Bush.

I hope that Bush has the guts to play hardball, as in making most of the discretionary spending cuts in dem districts, courting Southern dems to continue to switch parties, ansd spanking the donkey for its coziness with a America's enemies.

31 posted on 01/09/2005 9:25:13 PM PST by pierrem15
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Democrats are even more of a minority party than they were when Bush was sworn in four years ago...

and they need to be even smaller in 2006.


32 posted on 01/09/2005 9:38:38 PM PST by tomnbeverly (Its time to spend some political capital... Ouch that has to hurt liberals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
I see the scumbags at the WaPo have started dividing their stories into several parts. Three times the download (a real BIG pain in the ass for those of us stuck in 56K dialup HE11), three times the ads, etc.

Now, more than ever, please link to the printer friendly version of the article. This will solve both problems.

33 posted on 01/09/2005 9:59:43 PM PST by upchuck (I support the right of leftists to damage their credibility by saying stupid things out loud. MAdams)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

"Bush's domestic agenda presents opportunities to divide the GOP, break apart Bush's winning coalition and recapture some of the voters who supported Bush last fall."

Gee, just ignore the needs of the nation while you dance the Sore-Loserman.


34 posted on 01/09/2005 10:05:24 PM PST by Fenris6 (3 Purple Hearts in 4 months w/o missing a day of work? He's either John Rambo or a Fraud)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

Its all about stopping the guy the Left views as Bushitler. Trust me here Freepers and Friends: its gonna be fast, thick, long and ugly. The Democrats are in no mood for a second term honeymoon.


35 posted on 01/09/2005 10:16:09 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh

" Then, despite anger and bitterness over how the 2000 election ended, Democrats were tentative and initially open to Bush's calls for bipartisan cooperation."

They did until they realized that he wasn't going to let them run the show like Bush 41 did.


36 posted on 01/09/2005 10:20:50 PM PST by oldbrowser (You lost.............get over it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Theresawithanh

" Then, despite anger and bitterness over how the 2000 election ended, Democrats were tentative and initially open to Bush's calls for bipartisan cooperation."

""Where was I? I missed this one.""

Well, a nanosecond IS a very short amount of time. So you are given a pass, just this once.


37 posted on 01/09/2005 10:22:03 PM PST by FastCoyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: crushelits

This is to be expected. They're Democrats; it what they do.

The real test here is whether the lily-livered members of the Stupid Party are going to sit on their asses and let it all happen for the umpteenth time, or whether they'll finally grow a pair.

Bets, anyone?


38 posted on 01/09/2005 10:25:28 PM PST by bowzer313
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ReadyNow

"kill your enemies"

Don't you think that's a little strong for an election ..?? I mean I'd like to get rid of a lot of these total bozos, but I think "kill" is a bit much.


39 posted on 01/09/2005 11:01:47 PM PST by CyberAnt (Where are the dem supporters? - try the trash cans in back of the abortion clinics.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: crushelits
I will never understand Democrats.

They are however, quite entertaining.

But not enough so that I will miss them when they are gone.

40 posted on 01/09/2005 11:38:35 PM PST by smoothsailing (Eagles Up !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson