Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Steven Gardner on OReilly
www.foxnews.com | 01/07/05

Posted on 01/07/2005 5:44:48 PM PST by traderrob6

Steven Gardner the 2 tour Viet Nam vet who served on sKerry's boat was interviewed by Bill O. Gardner was fired from Millenium his employer allegedly for criticizing Skerry and contradicting sKerry's accounts of his service in Viet Nam.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: oreilly; sbv; stevengardner
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last
OReilly was very fair to Steve and ended the program appealing to any listeners that might have a job worthy of Steves qualifications to contact him via OReilly's website
1 posted on 01/07/2005 5:44:48 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

That was a nice gesture of Mr O in helping Steve get a job.


2 posted on 01/07/2005 5:47:04 PM PST by dc-zoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
That was nice of oreily......but it kinda sounds like he is sucking up to the Republican SWIFTY'S supporter base. We were a big force in this election and oreily might be seeing the writing on the wall to those who have opposed us........This is just my opinion.
3 posted on 01/07/2005 5:50:02 PM PST by marmar (Even though I may look different then you...my blood runs red, white and blue.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dc-zoo

I agree. I only wish he would have been that fair with the SVFT during the campaign


4 posted on 01/07/2005 5:50:21 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Whoa.... Deja vu, man. Was this a replay?


5 posted on 01/07/2005 5:51:49 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

I seem to recall O'Reilly talking about the Swift Boat Vets' baloney.


6 posted on 01/07/2005 5:53:36 PM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Considering how he dissed Unfit For Command and the Swifties during the campaign this is but one very small step in a journey of public acknowlegement that O'reilly needs to make.


7 posted on 01/07/2005 5:53:49 PM PST by prairiebreeze (What did Jamie Gorelick know, and when did she know it??)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I think he was on Hannity a while back telling this story. Hope he gets a great job. What the heck in Millenium, his old job?


8 posted on 01/07/2005 5:54:18 PM PST by queenkathy (Fear Not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: queenkathy

Millenium Information Services. Records management etc


9 posted on 01/07/2005 5:57:49 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Short story on Orielly:
Pandered to the left to try to expand his audience and convince America he was not a "ideologue".
Right started to diss him ever where (notably here)for being a pompous pandering jack***
Now he has to pander to the very people who got him where he was in the first place.
Maybe he learned his lesson. But for me I have no respect for those who are so opportunistic that they will forgo their co principals for ratings.
10 posted on 01/07/2005 5:59:10 PM PST by Ksnavely
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

I will get any info on OH Really here on FR because I will never watch it again.
He and Dan Blather make a good team.


11 posted on 01/07/2005 6:02:21 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (expert, break it down, ex = has been, spurt = drip under pressure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ksnavely

Take all the TV journalist and applying that standard.... leaves you with only Hume, Krauthammer, and maybe Barnes


12 posted on 01/07/2005 6:03:37 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

For the record, O'Reilly is not a journalist.

He is a commentator.


13 posted on 01/07/2005 6:05:39 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: marmar

Bingo.


14 posted on 01/07/2005 6:06:33 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

I like Lou Dobbs!


15 posted on 01/07/2005 6:06:34 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

So in reality, are there any "journalists" left?


16 posted on 01/07/2005 6:07:24 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

In total agreement. Done with him.


17 posted on 01/07/2005 6:07:35 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Mears

DOBBS??? You mean the every show for 6 months prior to the election bemoaning the selling out of America thru outsourcing Dobbs??


18 posted on 01/07/2005 6:08:53 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Since when did O'Reilly start treating these guys with any respect?


19 posted on 01/07/2005 6:08:59 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

He thinks he is the only objective force out there. Couldn't find an objective point in a paper bag if it didn't have ratings attached or an opportunity to hawk his show or sell a doormat.

He has been downsized here in tidewater to a hour before Savage on delay. The doormat of filling time.


20 posted on 01/07/2005 6:10:05 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Hannity too. He's great!


21 posted on 01/07/2005 6:10:53 PM PST by queenkathy (Fear Not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Dobbs was a slight of hand Bush Basher.


22 posted on 01/07/2005 6:10:56 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Hume etc.

A journalist can be a commentator, but a commentator cannot be a journalist.

In other words, a journalist does actual reporting, but can also do opinion pieces. But, if you are just a commentator like O'Reilly, you are not a journalist.


23 posted on 01/07/2005 6:11:25 PM PST by rwfromkansas ("War is an ugly thing, but...the decayed feeling...which thinks nothing worth war, is worse." -Mill)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

Not too much slight of hand, seemed to me he was pretty darned blatant about it


24 posted on 01/07/2005 6:12:56 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

"I don't think anyone could forgive him after he had that love session with Rather."

I had hope for Oh Really when he asked Dan Blather about Juanita Broderick.

Dan Blather said "That was a personal sex life".
Oh Really didn't say anything else about Juanita.
I take it that both Dan and Bill think rape should only be a mans personal sex life.

Last time I watched this POS.


25 posted on 01/07/2005 6:13:52 PM PST by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (expert, break it down, ex = has been, spurt = drip under pressure.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

How about his newspaper column, certainly he could be considered as much of a journalist as say Dowd or Krugman


26 posted on 01/07/2005 6:14:18 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Ksnavely

All your facts about O'Reilly are true and I wanted to add that he was also hot to trot on getting Kerry on his show before the election. Well, it didn't happen and I think O'Reilly knows he sucked up to no avail and it only made him look ridiculous.


27 posted on 01/07/2005 6:17:24 PM PST by tirednvirginia (But things are looking up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Only to the uninformed.

Nobody watches or watched him. Irrelevant IMO.
28 posted on 01/07/2005 6:17:29 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Lou Dobbs is an idiot!


29 posted on 01/07/2005 6:19:45 PM PST by GoMonster (GO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: HuntsvilleTxVeteran

You know, you bring up a good point. Seems O'Really has a problem with stereotyping women.


30 posted on 01/07/2005 6:19:47 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: tirednvirginia

I still watch him, but I will admit a couple more times of kiss butt begging sKerry to come on and I would have quit


31 posted on 01/07/2005 6:19:59 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

O'Reilly was a total sh*theel to the Swifties during the election. He's dead to me.

On the other hand, Gardner deserves any good he can gain from the aftermath of this circus, and we are forever indebted to him and his peers.

Did I mention that Bill O sucks?


32 posted on 01/07/2005 6:21:31 PM PST by get'emall (It's not a tsunami... it's a business opportunity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
Like Kerry gave a crap. O'reilly has marginalized himself trying to play to both sides like he is objective. "loony left" and the "Wacko right". Does he really think that the middle was going to increase his ratings and does anyone want to watch 'direct' commentary opinion shows from the middle. Kiss of death. The right got him where he is and then he left us standed.

It is all about Bill.
33 posted on 01/07/2005 6:23:45 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

I think to a degree he was just a coward. He was catching a tremendous amount of crap from the left and he didn't have the guts to tough it out so he moved toward the middle to appease and be able to say "See look at me I am not a righty like you say i am"


34 posted on 01/07/2005 6:27:39 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

I caught him today lamenting the fact that the media has turned on him and that he "being the all knowing and fair minded Bill" gave them a chance and now he is going to shut them out. Made me want to puke. Says he admires Stern and Rush for never talking to the press and now he knows why --- when in the past he made fun of them for not talking to the press. Paranoid.

He plays the martyr like a fool. Not falling for it.


35 posted on 01/07/2005 6:27:57 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas
..not a journalist.

I'm not sure that term even has relevance today.

I can't think of one decent "journalist".

36 posted on 01/07/2005 6:30:35 PM PST by evad (DUmmie FUnnies and Pookie Toons-the start of a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

He said he admired Rush? Not too long ago he was taking hits at him. LOL

Kinda lonely at the top when you alienate your base. The MSM was never going to be his friend, and conservatives don't like being spat on to kiss up to the liberal elite.


37 posted on 01/07/2005 6:33:04 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

Brother Bill is a media whore....now is trying to figure out how to get his knees together again.....


38 posted on 01/07/2005 6:33:58 PM PST by RVN Airplane Driver (Thanks America for not slapping us in the face again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

yep. "now I know why Rush was so wise" (in so many words)

I feel so bad for him... boohoo.


39 posted on 01/07/2005 6:36:18 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: commonguymd

Priceless.

Is Bill aware the symbol of Republicans is an elephant? Long memories.

If he's repentant, he'll be willing to spend the next 10 years paying his dues. If he's still the opportunist I believe him to be, he'll fail in this makeover tour.


40 posted on 01/07/2005 6:43:51 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
O'Reilly was very dismissive and skeptical of the Swifties during the time that really mattered--much more dismissive and down-putting than should have been required of him given the amount of rock solid verification of Swifty issues that O'Reilly could have and SHOULD have highlighted on his program.

I chalked it up partly to his insincere PC obsession with looking "fair and balanced," so as to not offend liberals and the Kerry camp should they get into office. That part was a shameless and unprofessional CYA abomination--he knew BETTER.

There was just SO much water-tight information available on the Swifties' side, that unless you were mentally-lacking, Clueless Chrissy Matthews, MOST respectable and honorable journalists HAD to have had Rice Butt fingered for the lying, conniving, self-inflating, Machiavellian Moron that he had been exposed to be, and who expended any and all GOOD AND HONORABLE MEN, without blinking, FOR HIS OWN SICK ENDS.

THAT part made me the most disgusted with O'Reilly, and made clear any disillusionment I had of the intellectually dishonest panderer. I was then confident in exactly who/WHAT Bill was.

41 posted on 01/07/2005 6:58:27 PM PST by Miss Behave (Beloved daughter of Miss Creant, super sister of danged Miss Ology, and proud mother of Miss Hap.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

Heres the thing, one candidate appears on OReilly other one chickens out, chicken loses. 4 years later one candidate appears on OReilly other one chickens out chicken loses.....coincidence?


42 posted on 01/07/2005 7:08:23 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ksnavely
Oreilly can never convince me that he's a real conservative after he pandered to John Kerry throughout the election.I don't know if he's really a liberal or if he gave Kerry a pass because they have so much in common.It doesn't matter either way because he exposed himself as nothing more than a ratings hound who only cares about his ego.I'm sure Bill would have a liberal radio and TV show if we went through a liberal awakening instead of a conservative one.Didn't he come out around the same time as the republican takeover of the house?
43 posted on 01/07/2005 7:23:30 PM PST by rdcorso (Did I mention I was in Vietnam where I lost my backbone? Spineless John)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Most Liberals avoid FOX due to natural prejudice. Fox in '00 is not comparable to the success of FOX in '04. It was only this year that FOX became a viable competitor on level with ABC, CBS and NBC. It is not unusual Gore (a Liberal) would have avoided O'Reilly in '00.

In '04, Kerry took aversion of the press (MSM outlets included) to an extreme. His attempts to silence the Swiftees were only a small indicator of what he would have attempted in the W.H. While FOX was far more influential this election year, Kerry's aversion of a free press (liberal or conservative) dissuaded him from making an appearance on FOX once he won the primaries.

If your suggestion is that Bush won because neither Gore or Kerry appeared on O'Reilly's program, I think you elevate O'Reilly beyond his influence. Coincidences can be deciphered from any number of instances. It is no different than falling victim to the thought if the Redskins lost, Bush would lose. A myth broken this election cycle.

Until someone wishes to conduct a credible study that can cite O'Reilly as the turning point, I chalk this up to arrogance on Bill's part.


44 posted on 01/07/2005 7:27:49 PM PST by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker
But Kerry would stop by the inane Imus show. Don't know what to call Imus. Puke comes to mind.

I think you eloquently put Bill's O'Reilly's self-aggrandizing into perspective.
45 posted on 01/07/2005 7:32:27 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

He will fail. With me at least.


46 posted on 01/07/2005 7:33:04 PM PST by commonguymd (My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ksnavely
"But for me I have no respect for those who are so opportunistic that they will forgo their co principals for ratings."

I watch Bill if he has a particular guest on that I want to hear. Otherwise, you have "nailed him with precision." I do not have a problem with Orielly or any host when they go after a liberal or conservative so long as it is done with logic and analysis. When I saw the way Orielly dismissed the Swift Boat Vets out of hand and did not dispute their story but simply indicated that it was not true, during the election was the moment that I realized it is not about, "Who is looking out for you" but it is all about Bill Orielly.

If Orielly lurks here I would like to remind him it is best to go home from the dance with the one that brought you to the dance!

47 posted on 01/07/2005 7:39:27 PM PST by cpdiii (Oil Field Trash, Pilot, Pharmacist. (Oil Field Trash was the most fun.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

Yep-and he's still doing it----I just like him.


48 posted on 01/07/2005 8:38:17 PM PST by Mears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Soul Seeker

Actally I was pretty much saying that tongue in cheek


49 posted on 01/08/2005 6:14:45 AM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

I was very surprised to see O'Reilly have him on when he infuriated me and many others by dismissing the SVFT's claims without a second thought. So what has made him change his mind? He hasn't said he's changed it, but why is Gardner any more important to him than all the others that he dismissed without regard? I'm very curious.


50 posted on 01/08/2005 12:58:11 PM PST by penowa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson