Skip to comments.Resolutions For The Damned
Posted on 01/05/2005 8:06:15 AM PST by SmithL
This is the year.
No, really. This is the it. This is the year you resolve to let it all hang out and lick the fingertips of the divine and stop holding back and stop quivering with unchecked anticipation/dread as you realize that, if you care a whit for self-definition and spiritual nuance and hot wet intelligence and deep karmic color in this tsunami-hammered, Bush-ravaged world, you are desperately needed right now. It's true.
Alas, many are dejected. Many of the blue or Democratic or progressive or open-minded persuasion are understandably heading into 2005 feeling a bit out of sorts, depressed and bitter and angry and still just a little appalled at the apparent widespread fear-induced ignorance of a country that somehow re-elected the worst president in U.S. history. Yes, still.
Well, buck up, jacko. It could be worse. You could be Michael Jackson. Or Janet Jackson. Or Tito. You could be Anne Coulter or Bill O'Reilly or Trent Lott, people whose souls have become so infested with rat dung that their third eye is brown. See? Feel better already.
Or you could be Dubya himself, so utterly empty and blank eyed and falsely pious. He is but a lint speck on the coattails of time and you just know that you could poke him with your middle finger and all that would pour out would be sawdust and a bunch of tiny ball bearings.
(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...
You've been warned.
Morford wouldn't recognize the fingertips of the divine if they smacked him upside the head.
Nothing he writes makes any sense. I mean it...nothing. "Hot wet intelligence"? "Deep karmic color"? What IS this crap? What does it mean? Who is supposed to be reading this junk?
Proof positive that liberalism is a form of mental illness.
It constantly amazes me how Morford can be allowed to write (if it can be called writing) for any newspaper. He obviously is so blinded by his own bigotry and prejudices he is unable to think or write intelligently, he only rambles on about his hatreds and expects others to think it is insightful thinking. I suspect he leads a pretty sad life.
He knows that if he strings together enough words in a poetic sounding way devoid of definite meaning and throws in some Bush bashes, he'll be popular in San Fran.
This guy's father didn't hit him enough.
Morford and A$$bag are one and the same.
What a stooge. (Apologies to Moe, Larry, and Curly)
If FR is a Ted Rall-free zone, certainly Morford qualifies as well. His inane stupidity isn't fit for bird cage liner unless you really hate your bird.
Wow, that was like reading vomit with brail!
He (Morfordite) reminds me of the faggot who was putting parents on the train at King St station. The bone smuggler and his mother were chatting just like two women while Dad was GRITTING his teeth and looked ready to kill someone. Guess he did not know junior was a flamer!
I'm betting Morfordite's Dad has either disowned him or just ignores the butt pirate.
I had to go outside to laugh.
Reading Morford is like a study of abnormal psychology. The stream of consciousness of a depraved individual.
100 years ago, this guy would have been selling the Brooklyn Bridge. Same thing.
Q: How much feedback/mail do you typically get after a column is published? And what's the ratio between mail from your fans vs. those who hate you?
A: All depends on the column. A particularly pointed anti-Bush anti-war column will get me gobs of sneering hate mail, mostly from the delirious, hardcore psychopatriots at freerepublic.com or lucianne.com or andrewsullivan.com, et al, where they post chunks of my column in their discussion forums, along with my e-mail address, and encourage each other to flame me, usually in the cutest sort of monosyllabic, ragingly homophobic, horribly syntaxed, misspelled sort of way. Makes me proud to be an American. My girlfriend loves the anti-SF gay-bashing they aim my way, I might add.
Ranting fools--and this one is a real piece of work!--only have a job because their B.S. (Barbra Streisand or Bovine Scatology) fills up the space around the ads bought by advertisers. If enough people notify the advertisers about boycotting their products for sponsoring this drivel, the editurds will get the message and publish real Op-Ed, not hateful banalities.
If people only whine and write letters to the editor--and keep buying stuff from the advertisers without holding them to account--we will get more of the same...we've not held the correct feet to the correct fire....
Bush-gutted ... world
the worst president in U.S. history.
This is discourse? This somehow expands the free marketplace of ideas? From this drivel, you would assume that no evil existed on earth until Bush was elected (by "fear-induced ignorance" no less). And as for the "worst president in US history, apparently that is open to debate, since the majority of American voters think otherwise.
You could be Anne Coulter or Bill O'Reilly or Trent Lott, people whose souls have become so infested with rat dung that their third eye is brown.
Psssst. Pull your head out of its parking place and you'll see that yours is too. The difference is, with the possible exception of Trent Lott, the people this clown cited don't use that eye to see with.
Or you could be Dubya himself, so utterly empty and blank eyed and falsely pious.
Yeah, unlike Bill Clinton, who was a paragon of virtue.
He is but a lint speck on the coattails of time
And this author is what? Not exactly the Great Pyramid of Cheops when it comes to historical durability, is he?
and you just know that you could poke him with your middle finger and all that would pour out would be sawdust and a bunch of tiny ball bearings.
Which would be twice as much as would fall out of this vacuous windbag.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.