Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2

This will be interesting to watch considering he worked within that corrupt system, so he should probably present a valid defense.


4 posted on 11/30/2004 1:24:44 AM PST by Paul C. Jesup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Paul C. Jesup

If he doesn't somehow get this case into civil court and out of tax court, he won't stand a chance. That's like presenting a cogent theological defense before the Taliban.


7 posted on 11/30/2004 3:31:08 AM PST by ovrtaxt ("Health nuts are going to feel stupid someday, lying in hospitals dying of nothing". -- Redd Foxx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Paul C. Jesup
This will be interesting to watch considering he worked within that corrupt system, so he should probably present a valid defense.

The "system" doesn't have anything to do with his guilt or innocence. If his defense is based on the claim that the 16th amendment to the U.S. Constitution was never properly ratified, it seems to me to be a cut and dried case. Either it was or it wasn't, and he can present evidence to show his side and the government can present evidence to show its side. Whether the IRS is corrupt has no bearing on the case.
14 posted on 11/30/2004 5:10:51 AM PST by drjimmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson