Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate GOP set to go 'nuclear' over judges
Cox news service via the Times Argus ^ | 11/28/04 | Chuck Lindell

Posted on 11/28/2004 2:36:14 PM PST by NeoCaveman

Senate Republicans, boldly confident after their Nov. 2 electoral success, are preparing to end months of frustrating delays over President Bush's judicial picks by hitting Democrats with Republican's ultimate legislative weapon.

But the Republican threat to neuter long-cherished filibuster rules by steamrolling Democrats is risky — so potentially destructive that Capitol Hill calls it the "nuclear option." Democratic retaliation would be swift and long-lasting, raising the prospect of escalating clashes in a body that prides itself on gentility and cool judgment.

Even so, Republican leaders are signaling their intent to go nuclear in word and deed.

"We're going to use every tool we possibly can," said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who also unveiled a kinder, gentler phrase for the potential rules change: the "constitutional option."

"Republicans are loaded for bear, spoiling for a confrontation with Senate Democrats on judicial appointments," said Norm Ornstein, an expert on Congress for the conservative-leaning American Enterprise Institute. "For a lot of conservatives, this has really become an issue that leaves them passionate."

(Excerpt) Read more at timesargus.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; Government
KEYWORDS: dems; filibuster; judges; judicialnominees; nuclearoption; nukular; obstructionist; scotus; zotthedems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-129 next last
Lots of interesting stuff here. Including the possibility that Specter is on board for this. I bet that was the quid pro quo for the chairmanship.

But I'm not breaking out the champagne quite yet

1 posted on 11/28/2004 2:36:16 PM PST by NeoCaveman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Thermonuclear would be better.


2 posted on 11/28/2004 2:37:45 PM PST by Paleo Conservative (Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Dan Rather's got to go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
We already have the DUmmies crying.
3 posted on 11/28/2004 2:38:37 PM PST by NeoCaveman ("I expressed myself rather forcefully, felt better after I had done it," -- VP Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

DO IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


4 posted on 11/28/2004 2:38:39 PM PST by OwnershipSociety
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

I'll celebrate this in the past tense only. I'll believe it when Brit smacks Juan in the face with it.


5 posted on 11/28/2004 2:40:56 PM PST by Petronski (One night in Bangkok makes a hard man humble, not much between despair and ecstasy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
escalating clashes in a body that prides itself on gentility and cool judgment.

Well it's about freakin' time! Enough of this “gentility” hoo-haw...if the DemocratsMarxists on Capitol Hill want a gang-fight, let's give it to them, and make 'em sorry they asked!

6 posted on 11/28/2004 2:42:43 PM PST by TonyRo76 (American by birth. Patriot by choice. Christian by grace.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

Mitch McConnell said it takes 67 votes to change a rule on Cal Thomas last night.


7 posted on 11/28/2004 2:45:27 PM PST by Dave Burns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

I think you might be on to something. Snarlin' Arlen is all smiles lately, and that means that even for a RINO like him, he knows which side his bread is buttered on. He could certainly go across the aisle ala 'Jumpin Jerk Jeffords', but that isn't how he wants to end his political career.

Arlen wants a nice write up in the history books and if he has to turn right after many decades of leaning left, he'll do it. Politics makes strange bedfellows, as the saying goes, and Arlen is as strange as they come.

But he is a shrewd politician, and I think he would be on board for putting an end to filibustering shenanigans by the 'Rats, because the more the MINORITY party in the Senate tries to screw around with judicial nominations, the more it reflects badly on Specter, because he doesn't want ANYBODY to ever mutter something like "even Orin Hatch ran a better committee than Specter", so when it comes time to nuke the Senate 'Rats, I predict Senator Specter will be in the bombardier's bubble, lining up the targets, and calling out "BOMB'S AWAY!"...

Does my heart good to picture that. Imagine. Arlen Specter coming to his senses even at this late date.

Heh.


8 posted on 11/28/2004 2:45:57 PM PST by Mad Mammoth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

I'd still love to see the letter they made Specter sign.....


9 posted on 11/28/2004 2:46:06 PM PST by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Yada, yada, yada... I believe it when I see it. Talk is cheap.


10 posted on 11/28/2004 2:46:13 PM PST by Babsig (I regret that my first ever vote was for Specter for Senator in 1986.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
We already have the DUmmies crying.

And they don't understand the difference between a rule and the Constitution.

11 posted on 11/28/2004 2:47:22 PM PST by AndrewC (New Senate rule -- Must vote on all Presidential appointments period certain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OwnershipSociety
This is what I voted for!

Pack the court, pack the court,

Come on everybody, repeat after me and sing along

Pack the court, pack the court here we go

Pack the court

repeat until tired or bored /rant

12 posted on 11/28/2004 2:48:52 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (I got a fever, and the only prescription is MORE COWBELLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
Well it's about freakin' time! Enough of this “gentility” hoo-haw...if the DemocratsMarxists on Capitol Hill want a gang-fight, let's give it to them, and make 'em sorry they asked!

Exactly. The Dems already declared war.

13 posted on 11/28/2004 2:49:34 PM PST by Aquinasfan (Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

14 posted on 11/28/2004 2:49:50 PM PST by budman_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: K4Harty

Launch them suckers! : )


15 posted on 11/28/2004 2:50:21 PM PST by WestVirginiaRebel ("Nature abhors a moron."-H.L. Mencken)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
You know, I'm not scared about Democrat "retaliation." First of all, they'd be irrelevant. Secondly, the GOP never filibustered judicial nominations, so if the Rats regain the Senate and Presidency, so what if they used the nuclear option? They'd never have to use it in the first place.

The press is whining for the Rats, so it must mean we're getting somewhere.

16 posted on 11/28/2004 2:51:01 PM PST by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Senate GOP set to go 'nuclear' over judges.........

It's about time. Too bad tiny Tom won't be there to have his snout rubbed in the dirt.


17 posted on 11/28/2004 2:51:24 PM PST by dennisw (G_D: Against Amelek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
"We're going to use every tool we possibly can," said Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., who also unveiled a kinder, gentler phrase for the potential rules change: the "constitutional option."

If they use every tool they possibly can, President Bush needs to do some appointments during the Congressional Break period.

Clinton set the precedent for that. We need to do it too to save time and energy.

"Constitutional option" ...what the heck is that? Oh yea, to Democrats using the Constitution is just an option. Come on Frist, lead with the Constitution...

Four years isn't that long, we need to expedite lots of things.

18 posted on 11/28/2004 2:53:14 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
The press is whining for the Rats, so it must mean we're getting somewhere.

Music to my ears is a whining RAT. boo hoo hoo...conservative judges...boo hoo hoo...

19 posted on 11/28/2004 2:53:14 PM PST by IllumiNaughtyByNature (I got a fever, and the only prescription is MORE COWBELLS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Yeah, it's call winning. NOTE to Dimocrats: we won, we govern, get use to it.


20 posted on 11/28/2004 2:55:00 PM PST by Lurking in Kansas (;&ôÀžUñj/ÈëžÕ “ ’· (If you have to ask, you won't understand))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Petronski

Jaun Williams is a DNC sock puppet. He doesn't exist from the waist down.


21 posted on 11/28/2004 2:55:05 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Free the Fallujah one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76

AMEN


22 posted on 11/28/2004 2:55:28 PM PST by myvoice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

It's about damn time!

Do unto the Dem liberals as they have done unto us-IN SPADES!!!!


23 posted on 11/28/2004 2:56:33 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (If you were still in the womb, would you trust your life to Specter?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
'Bout frickin' time.


24 posted on 11/28/2004 2:57:12 PM PST by Prime Choice (I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Since 1994, the GOP has had so many opportunites to shine. But it hasn't done so yet. With so many RINO's, it's hard to say what can and/or will happen. As a life long resident of Kansas, which has not elected a RAT senator for nearly 60 years, it still elects RINO's. I hope the Senate and House Republicans seize the moment........it's long overdue.


25 posted on 11/28/2004 2:57:13 PM PST by WyCoKsRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

To quote Homer Simpson...

"...It's NU-KLE-EER..."


26 posted on 11/28/2004 2:57:22 PM PST by vannrox (The Preamble to the Bill of Rights - without it, our Bill of Rights is meaningless!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED

Nor from the neck up.


27 posted on 11/28/2004 2:57:53 PM PST by F.J. Mitchell (If you were still in the womb, would you trust your life to Specter?????)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: TASMANIANRED
Jaun Williams is a DNC sock puppet. He doesn't exist from the waist down.

Voted "Best Description of Juan Williams in 2004."

28 posted on 11/28/2004 2:58:14 PM PST by Prime Choice (I like Democrats, too. Let's exchange recipes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
....in a body that prides itself on gentility and cool judgment.

The Democrats killed that silly notion 15 years ago when they first unveiled the tactic now known as "Borking". The Democrats have since refined and further developed their "art of the smear" through the Clarence Thomas hearings ("a high-tech lynching"), and have now taken the unprecedented path of filibustering TEN lower-level court appointments.

I am delighted to see that the Republicans have finally realized that the Democrats went "nuclear" long, long ago.

29 posted on 11/28/2004 2:58:43 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Bull hockey. Why is it "going nuclear" for Republicans to work the rules to their own advantage, but not when the other party does so? The dems had already "gone nuclear" by using the filibuster against judicial nominees for the first time in history.


30 posted on 11/28/2004 2:59:01 PM PST by ultima ratio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

I'll believe it when I see it.


31 posted on 11/28/2004 2:59:35 PM PST by Dan from Michigan ("now we got this guy in the Oval office who don't take no sh*t from no gimpy little countries!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

BTTT


32 posted on 11/28/2004 2:59:56 PM PST by Fiddlstix (This Tagline for sale. (Presented by TagLines R US))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro
President Bush needs to do some appointments during the Congressional Break period.

Recess appointments are next to worthless.

33 posted on 11/28/2004 3:00:31 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

I didn't know that, how come?


34 posted on 11/28/2004 3:01:32 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: F.J. Mitchell

His head is full of sawdust and he has little googly eyes.


35 posted on 11/28/2004 3:05:00 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Free the Fallujah one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

I'd keep the cork in, too, because I'll believe this show of spine from the Senate GOP when I see it. Not a moment before, since they don't exactly have a record of standing up for anything.

MM


36 posted on 11/28/2004 3:05:30 PM PST by MississippiMan (Americans should not be sacrificed on the altar of political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prime Choice
Thank you, Juan tried to have an original thought once but he plagiarized a 2 year old
37 posted on 11/28/2004 3:06:16 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (Free the Fallujah one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
Pubbies are like mating elephants. Lots of trumpeting, puffing, and stomping around but nothing happens until years later.
38 posted on 11/28/2004 3:06:22 PM PST by TUX (Domino effect)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Frankly, we've heard this foofoodust before--about 4 years ago.

And where are we now?


39 posted on 11/28/2004 3:08:35 PM PST by ninenot (Minister of Membership, TomasTorquemadaGentlemen'sClub)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

DO IT!

The nation will never have another chance to jerk the pendulum back to center. If not now, then lookout. The left will dismantle the country to get their way. Pubs better come out swinging.. We the voters have done what we could to clear the deck.. now it's time to get down to business.


40 posted on 11/28/2004 3:13:44 PM PST by JesseJane (Air France flights 1192, 491, 288, 751, 216, now boarding...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Same threat from June, 2003.

When Frist finally DOES something besides whine and threaten, maybe he will be deserving of respect. Until Frist finally DOES something, this is just more empty threat served with more whine and cheese.


41 posted on 11/28/2004 3:14:59 PM PST by TomGuy (America: Best friend or worst enemy. Choose wisely.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ninenot
Frankly, we've heard this foofoodust before--about 4 years ago.

Well in 2000 there were 50 Republican Senators with 5 RINO's for a net 45.
In 2002 there were 51 Republican Senators with 5 RINO's for a net 46.
Now there are 55 Republican Senators with 5 RINO's and the head RINO has been castrated.
So now there is cause for some optomism.

42 posted on 11/28/2004 3:16:24 PM PST by NeoCaveman (http://route-82.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Same threat from June, 2003.

True. But the Senate math looks a lot better than it does 2 years ago.

As 55 R's is better than 51.

43 posted on 11/28/2004 3:17:33 PM PST by NeoCaveman (http://route-82.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident

Unless a senator from the state of the chosen candidate approves, the candidate does not advance. That too must go.
Harry Reid just had a hold on many appointees, but released his hold only when his guy got appointed to the EPA so that the Nuclear Waste issue in Yucca Mt. would have an opponent.
Blackmail, the democrat way. So, it doesn't matter if your party loses, so long as appointments must have home-state senate approval.


44 posted on 11/28/2004 3:21:41 PM PST by Prost1 (If you teach what your history teachers taught you, you will be corrected...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

'bout time would be the best comment.


45 posted on 11/28/2004 3:23:36 PM PST by deaconjim (Freep the world!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

Recess appointments expire at the end of any Congressional session. So any such appointments may be useful in the short term, but they are certainly no substitute for the normal lifetime appointments that come as the result of Senate confirmation.

Regards,
LH


46 posted on 11/28/2004 3:24:17 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dave Burns
"Mitch McConnell said it takes 67 votes to change a rule on Cal Thomas last night."

The 'nuclear' option does not involve this kind of rule change. It means that when the RATS Filibuster a Court nomination, the President of the Senate (if the Pubbies go Nuclear, Cheney would come in and act as President) would pound the gavel and declare the filibuster Unconstitutional and the Senate would move on and take a vote whereby 51 votes would win.
47 posted on 11/28/2004 3:24:35 PM PST by TRY ONE (NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

...Democratic retaliation...

how?

48 posted on 11/28/2004 3:28:11 PM PST by clintonh8r (Get Out The Gloat!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave Burns
Mitch McConnell said it takes 67 votes to change a rule on Cal Thomas last night.

Why would he say that? Obviously, if that was the case, then no "nuclear option" would exist at all and there wouldn't even be any discussion. Fortunately, it only takes 51 votes to change the rule.

49 posted on 11/28/2004 3:28:57 PM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: dubyaismypresident
In the words of that great American, Al Bundy: "LET'S ROCK!!!!!"
50 posted on 11/28/2004 3:31:21 PM PST by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-129 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson