Skip to comments.
Kinsey & Ebert, At the Movies
Illinois Leader ^
| 11/19/2004
| Arlen Williams
Posted on 11/26/2004 12:26:19 PM PST by McCormick Reaper
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Meet America's "Pseudoscientific High Priest of the Sexual Revolution" and "20th Century mega-villian."
Alfred Kinsey had researchers observe the sexual torture of children of all ages, down to 5 months. "Orgams" they recorded in these hideous criminal acts included hysterical crying, screams, and... convulsions. His research critera was a joke, from a scientific perspective --not funny at all, from a human perspective.
To: McCormick Reaper
More than not funny, it's hideous! The plan is to produce more and more dysfunctional homosexuals, (as we all know 87% of homosexuals were sexually abused as children) thus increasing their numbers. For this end, they abuse children. Every one of these people should be behind bars. Those poor kids will never be right.
2
posted on
11/26/2004 12:41:16 PM PST
by
gidget7
(God Bless America, and our President George W. Bush)
To: McCormick Reaper
Wasn't there a movie a few years ago, glorifying the Marquis de Sade?
To: McCormick Reaper
I was reading Drudge and clicked on one of his story/links regarding the latest box office results.
MOJO: http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=kinsey.htm
I was pleasantly surprised to see that the movie about the pervert and discredited so-called sex scholar, Kinsey, was fully bombing at the box office. Kinsey cost $11 million to produce; was released Nov. 12 and to date has only made $1 million. It is upside-down some $10 million.
To: gidget7
as we all know 87% of homosexuals were sexually abused as childrenI have not heard this. Do yo have a source for this statistic>
5
posted on
11/26/2004 12:42:58 PM PST
by
Maceman
(Too nuanced for a bumper sticker)
To: McCormick Reaper
"The Chicago Sun Times' film critic Roger Ebert is a native of Downstate Urbana."I thought it was Siskel that was from Urbana.
To: Paul Atreides
Wasn't there a movie a few years ago, glorifying the Marquis de Sade? "Quills"
To: Paul Atreides
Quills?
Plot Outline: In a Napoleonic era insane asylum, an inmate, the irrepressible Marquis De Sade, fights a battle of wills against a tyrannically prudish doctor.
8
posted on
11/26/2004 1:02:15 PM PST
by
weegee
(WE FOUGHT ZOGBYISM November 2, 2004 - 60 Million Voters versus 60 Minutes - BUSH WINS!!!)
To: taxcutisapayraise
Isn't "Alexander" bombing, as well?
To: McCormick Reaper
Not surprising that the homosexual Ebert believes in the fradualant Kinsey. No surprise at all.
10
posted on
11/26/2004 1:05:26 PM PST
by
Bullish
To: Bullish
Ebert never saw a homosexually-themed movie he didn't like.
To: Paul Atreides
12
posted on
11/26/2004 1:07:13 PM PST
by
Bullish
To: weegee
Funny how sadomasochistic rapists are heroes, while moral people are not only prudes, but tyrannical prudes....
13
posted on
11/26/2004 1:11:15 PM PST
by
unspun
(unspun.info | Did U work your precinct, churchmembers, etc. for good votes?)
To: Paul Atreides
I do not see how Alexander can fail to be a flop. $155m budget, $60m marketing. Maybe they're hoping for outrageous overseas box office. It's too early, look at Drudge Saturday night.
But, according to Box Office Mojo, only 235 movies have ever made $215m. Ever.
To: Paul Atreides
15
posted on
11/26/2004 1:14:47 PM PST
by
bonfire
To: taxcutisapayraise
It's too early to judge the bombasity of the movie. They release it for academy consideration at a few theatres in LA and NYC during the holiday season and hope it will survive until the oscars. Then a boost from a win and into the spring.
If it really tanks, it won't get wide/countrywide release and will disappear. My guess is that this will be it's fate. Then we will know it's truely a bomb.
To: verifythentrust
first "wide" is citywide.
To: taxcutisapayraise
>i>was released Nov. 12 and to date has only made $1 million. It is upside-down some $10 million
It was initially released to 5 theaters, the following week to 36, and is now in 185. The per-theater box office is high. The distributors have been testing the waters to see how much interest there is in the film. It's not a bust yet, which is why Ebert may be talking it up
18
posted on
11/26/2004 1:16:40 PM PST
by
SauronOfMordor
(We are going to fight until hell freezes over and then we are going to fight on the ice)
To: AmishDude
Oliver Stone has fled to Europe to avoid critics here. The public has already pegged this movied as Stone's "gay" movie and a poor script flop.
Does the EU have similar buzz outlets? Do EU movie goers have the same access to the internet, text messaging movie observations, or just finding the movie reviews?
To: McCormick Reaper
His research critera was a joke, from a scientific perspective --not funny at all, from a human perspective.
So was Margaret Mead's. The principal postulates of liberal agenda are badly executed hoaxes. Liberals count on the basic trait of human nature - laziness .
Information is out there but the majority of people will not bother to check.
20
posted on
11/26/2004 1:20:49 PM PST
by
DTA
(proud pajamista)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson