Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cathedral Damaged In Apparent Anti-Gay Exorcism
Star Tribune ^ | November 24, 2004 | Herón Márquez Estrada

Posted on 11/24/2004 9:25:38 AM PST by wallcrawlr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-245 last
To: Canticle_of_Deborah; thor76
And, the Eucharist is not "blessed"; it is "consecrated."

The good deacon is probably assuming that the word was used adjectively or as the past participle. In which case, such usage would be perfectly correct.

Blessed = consecrated; Oxford English Dictionary.

Given that good grammar, like catechesis, is not his strong suit, it is unlikely that he had considered the use of the verb in the 3rd person, preterite tense of the transitive form.

But, heh, be thankful that you didn't use Latin. Lord knows the butchering job he'd have done on that.

Also, for what it's worth, I've always thought that you were not stupid too. Until, that is, you disagree with old loud-mouth. Then it's obvious that:

"you're not so smart after all"

LOL.

241 posted on 11/26/2004 12:54:53 PM PST by Selous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: murphE

For anyone to claim that hell is empty flies in the face of right reason, scripture, the writings of the saints & Doctors of the church, as well as the visions granted to certain saints and other priviledged souls (i.e. the children/seers of Fatima).

But whta is does wonderfully is to promote the agenda of the Evil One, and the anti-church partisans who serve him, many of whom wear backwards collars.


242 posted on 11/26/2004 3:13:31 PM PST by thor76 (Vade retro, Draco! Crux sacra sit mihi lux! St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Grey Ghost II

I believe that the Church's teaching applies to a priest that has some doubt about what he's doing but does not apply to a priest who clearly intends the opposite of what the Church intends. I also believe the Church has been infiltrated by atheists and the presumption of intent cannot so easily be granted.

My response would be: yes. You are on the right track.


243 posted on 11/26/2004 3:15:19 PM PST by thor76 (Vade retro, Draco! Crux sacra sit mihi lux! St. Michael the Archangel defend us in battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: thor76

Thank you for that information. I haven't been in the Cathedral in over 30 years, having moved away from Boston.


244 posted on 11/28/2004 7:38:48 PM PST by jjmcgo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: thor76
But while the satanist in the Black Mass can torture and degrade Christ again, and take pleasure in it, he cannot take away the triumph of the cross. Never. He merely repeats the torture of the physical body.... As Christ allowed his physical body to be assailed in His Passion, so he allows [his physical body to be assailed] in both the Eucharist ...
Just to clarify: Does Christ feel the present-day assaults by satanists on his body as he felt the assaults by the executioners on his body during the Passion?
245 posted on 12/03/2004 8:41:33 AM PST by eastsider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-245 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson