Posted on 11/15/2004 9:43:30 AM PST by Willie Green
There is probably a much more interesting story if you look into the relationship of CEMEX and the BLM.
*****
Alternative sites to a gigantic sand and gravel mine in Soledad Canyon are being explored in the San Bernardino area as Santa Clarita city officials Thursday reported some progress in their talks with the firm that owns the rights to mine the canyon.
The mine proposed for Soledad Canyon would be the largest aggregate mine in the history of the world, said Rep. Howard Buck McKeon, R-Santa Clarita, during a Thursday community meeting held at the Sports Complex.
This is a gold mine, he said. It just happens its in a bad area for us.
McKeon said a consultant has been retained to help the two sides reach an agreement. A city official said the city was not paying for the consultant.
They will try to come up with an amicable solution for the community that (Perez) can take to his stockholders, McKeon said. If they do (bring a solution to me), my job is to get it passed in the House and the Senate and signed by the president. We cant start working on the bill until they get an agreement. It would be too easy to kill. Other interests dont want it passed.
Those other interests represent fellow congressmen who dont want to see the U.S. Bureau of Land Managements authority eroded.
The BLM issued leases to Cemexs predecessor. Los Angeles County challenged permits to mine there but later backed off.
The city joined the fray a bit late but with vehemence, saying the mine would result in gross air pollution in Canyon Country, jam state Route 14 with truck traffic and pose traffic hazards on local streets.
Santa Clarita city officials are holding out the hope that a land swap would result in minimal mining in Soledad Canyon in exchange for unchallenged mining rights somewhere less populated.
Bedrosian said Thursday that the BLM has been asked about its holdings in California and elsewhere in the country, as far away as Florida.
Among the areas that were subject to inquiry was Rep. Jerry Lewis Inland Empire district, a desert area of Southern California where much aggregate has already been mined.
Lewis, R-San Bernardino, was alerted by McKeon that a potential Cemex site might find its way into his district, said Jim Specht, Lewis spokesman.
In McKeons vast district, the largest potential aggregate mining site would yield only a small fraction of the aggregate that could be taken from the Soledad Canyon site.
McKeon denounced the BLM for foisting the open-pit mining operation on Santa Clarita. The agencys contract with the former owner of the property Transit Mixed Concrete was not on our radar scope in 1990, he said.
The government has a right to do what it wants to do on its property a practice called federal pre-emption. The BLM cannot administratively change the leases. The only way the status of the leases can be changed is if Cemex gives them back to the BLM or if a law is passed by Congress that modifies the term, or terminates the leases, said Michael Murphy, Santa Claritas intergovernmental relations officer.
http://www.the-signal.com/News/ViewStory.asp?storyID=5577
Thinking about the necessity that the Mexicans been in the United States must to construct fast and economically their houses in Mexico, we created Construmex.
The objective of this initiative is to help to canalize the originating shipments of money of that country, to ours, destined to the acquisition of materials for construction. The service works through a branch that allows to orient and to order the necessities of materials, with the guarantee of its delivery in the Mexican territory.
At the moment it is counted on nine branches in the United States, located in the cities of Ash, the Angels, Santa Ana and Lynwood, Huntington Park and San Fernando in California; an office in Chicago Illinois and two in Houston Texas. Construmex offers information of the more than 2 thousand distributors of construction equipments in Mexico, certificates and recommended by CEMEX, thus covering all the national territory.
http://tools.search.yahoo.com/language/translation/translatedPage.php?tt=url&text=http%3a//www.construmex.com/&lp=es_en&.intl=us
Cemex can deliver a higher quality product to Mexico, if it is produced in the US. Cemex is partnering with the United States government, with money guaranteed by that taxpayer supported guarantee against bad business investments, OPIC.
CEMEX and US officials in Congress and the BLM may have a very corrupt relationship going in order to build infrastrucutre down in Mexico, as required by the NAFTA trade agreements in accordance with WTO directives for capacity building and infrastructure developments.
American citzens who blindly support these "free trade" agreements that use tax dollars to create an environment out of country that multinational corporations can step in and take the profit are just plain wrong.
Its called la mordida-- the bite. To do business in Mexico you have to give them something. Our government is propping up this corrupt system with their public/private partnerships-- just another manifestation of la mordida.
Cemex is a Mexican company. OPIC is for American companies. And where is this "partnership?" I don't see it.
In terms of corruption, furthermore, Cemex is relatively clean. Are you sure you're not confusing it with Pemex, which is relatively dirty?
The United States has created a very privileged class down in Mexico. Here is a joint US Mexico statement on US plans to invest taxpayer dollars in Mexico.
Our governments has pledged to :
Lowering the cost to Mexicans and Mexican-Americans in the United States of sending money home so that their families get to keep more of their hard-earned wages;
Increasing the accessibility of capital to Mexican entrepreneurs so that they can grow their businesses and create more and better jobs.
Increasing investment in housing, and the creation of a secondary mortgage market, so more Mexicans can become homeowners.
***
So by accepting the Matricular consular card as ID, illegals can now open bank accounts and do interbank transfers of money to Mexico instead of wiring it.
This program requires the flouting of US laws that make it illegal to abet illegal aliens in this country.
How does the US government increase accessiblity of loans to Mexican entrepreneurs? Using our tax money thats how.
Finally, the plan to increase investment in housing is directly related to this article. Our government, BLM, is granting accessiblity to US natural resources that they do not allow citizen owned companies to CEMEX. In turn, CEMEX is exporting this product for sale to Mexicans in Mexico. In a government private partnership, CEMEX has set up a loan system in this country for homebuilding for otherwise unqualified illegal alien homebuyers. OPIC is part of this whole grand scheme.
Also, "on April 27, the Mexican Senate ratified an agreement between the government of Mexico and the U.S. Overseas Private Investment Corporation (or OPIC)," Alan Larson of the U.S. State Department pointed out. "Through this agreement, which was signed at the P4P Workshop in San Francisco last year, OPIC can for the first time offer all of its programs and services to provide investment support in Mexico, up to $250 million per project. Initially, OPIC intends to focus on projects in education, municipal infrastructure, environment and housing."
While much has been accomplished, we dare not be complacent for at least two reasons," Larson cautioned. "First, there are many small towns and rural areas throughout central and southern Mexico which have not yet been touched by our efforts.
Private-sector investment, corporate citizenship, and interaction between the public and private sectors all play "integral roles" in helping to advance social and economic development in underserved regions of Mexico, Larson concluded. He applauded the contributions of "people who care about creating economic opportunities for the average Mexican,"
***
Let's see, the free traders say its not the duty of the government to make jobs for Americans, yet here is a state deparment employee in an official state department announcement that it is the duty of our government to create jobs in Mexico for Mexican citizens. This is unabashed socialism of the global kind-- and is exactly the fundamental purpose of the WTO's "free trade".
***
"I look forward to working with you as we continue our efforts to fulfill the aspirations of our presidents and our citizens -- for commerce, jobs, education, and opportunity in a prosperous future."
**
An employee of the US state deparment is working to fulfill the aspirations of the president of a foreign country. How terrific.
http://usinfo.state.gov/xarchives/display.html?p=washfile-english&y=2004&m=June&x=20040629170556GLnesnoM0.9142877&t=livefeeds/wf-latest.html
Did they actually sign that abomination?
If you've read posts about the UN, you might be interested in this:
Partnership for Prosperity appears to be a UN Action plan, and the above posts demostrate the UN authority over our US government as all of the items in the action plan are now policies that the US taxpayer is funding for Mexico.
***
The Partnership for Prosperity representatives of both the U.S. and Mexican government presented this report at the United Nations Financing for Development conference that took place from March 18-22, 2002 in Monterrey, Mexico. The Partnership proposes to leverage private resources to achieve economic development goals.
The Action Plan for the U.S.-Mexico Partnership for Prosperity outlines a number of the steps that the two countries may pursue in order to increase economic and labor opportunities in less developed areas of Mexico.
http://www.mexico-trade.com/JUNE2002/page4.html
Here is how US money is used to put American citizens out of work.
Spending US taxpayer dollars in Mexico, where labor, land and regulations do not have such an impact on cost the UN approved U.S.-MEXICO PARTNERSHIP ACTION PLAN will use the US department of Agriculture to
" match producers with agribusiness firms and retailers to encourage direct commercialization of Mexican products in the U.S. "
In other words set up an unfair competition for US producers by Mexican producers paid for by American citizens.
And here is how the software industry was established in India, again US taxpayer dollars with the approval of the United Nations, is going to Mexico to
"foster the creation of software parks and factories. The U.S. will contribute by facilitating private-sector contacts."
In other words, US taxpayer dollars will build r&d parks in Mexico so companies can abandon US workers for a subsidized workforce in Mexico.
Finally, what is this all about?
"The U.S. Department of Labor will continue to assist Mexico's Labor Secretariat in the ongoing development of an internet-based job and talent databank that will be used at employment service centers in Mexico.
"
http://www.mexico-trade.com/JUNE2002/
Yeah but, Bush is all for this stuff. He understands that inside every human being in every nation is an American just waiting to get out and he must represent them.
We must be getting something in return, something big.
Yes we are getting some big things out of it. A big big deficit. Big big taxes. Big big problems with our own infrastructure, since we are not spending our money to keep it up. Big big government. Big big UN influence over us because they control the dialog on infrastructure development and capacity building through their action plans resulting in big big influence of foreign countries over Americans.
Unless that plant is located right on the border, the transportation costs would mitigate any quality benefits. Plants south of the border can make good product when they want to. I know. It's my job to analyze the stuff.
You're right its regional. According to the article, CEMEX finds buyers in the US-- they purchase it here for delivery in Mexico.
As far as I know it was signed by both governments. I can't remember if there is a congressional oversight period, haven't heard of any. I need to go back and read the pdf file. I dislike pdf files.:<)I'll ping you with a link when I find them.
Hey, Lou Dobbs is worth watching (all I get is CNN!) Tonight Rumsfeld said we HAVE to protect our borders. He seemed rather shocked that we weren't. He also said people all over the world know our southern border is pourous and they will come through it.
I'm going to see if the transcript is up yet.
He seemed shocked that we are not protecting our borders? No way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.