Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latchkey Nation:Home Alone in America
The Star-Ledger ^ | November 14, 2004 | Mary Eberstadt

Posted on 11/14/2004 10:22:35 AM PST by Founding Father

click here to read article

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: Marinefamilyx3

Thank you for saying it. After 18 years with three kids in the public school system, that is exactly the conclusion I came to.
I loved just about every child my children befriended, the parents were constant problems. The latest example, a parent mixed up four screw drivers and served my 15 year old daughter till she threw up. Then told her not to tell anyone, it would be her and my daughters secret. Turns out she had been doing that to high school kids for 5 years and the superintendent and principal had known about it for years.
Thank God there is no more public school system for my kids. Now I have to deal with University of Oregon, but no parents!!!!!!!

61 posted on 11/14/2004 2:48:42 PM PST by thirst4truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

I would wager at least 25% percent of these children are probably feeling the effects of their busy activity schedules. Answer for parents: cut back on some activities and relax with your children.

62 posted on 11/14/2004 2:55:42 PM PST by Baby Bear (Conserve and grow your money...gain power in return.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Recovering Ex-hippie

My older brother, sister and I were all 'Latch Key Kids" before the term was ever invented. Mom and Dad both worked. So we kids has lots to keep ourselves occupied. Homework. Chores. A huge back yard with trees to climb later in the day. After a dinner we all sat down to every night.

The telephone and television were off-limits until after Mom and Dady got home. We'd watch the news during dinner (Which started my life-long dispisal of Walter Cronkite) and maybe an hour later in the evening.

That was in the 1960s, so I'd imagine some kids were kinda F-ed Up in the 70s, 80. and 90s. F-ed Up, ignored kids grow up to "manage", not "raise" F-ed Up, ignored kids.


63 posted on 11/14/2004 2:58:17 PM PST by Jack Deth (When In Doubt.... Empty The Magazine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father
Your premise is completely incorrect. The constitution is a contract between states to cede certain enumerated powers to a central government. Any powers not expressly ceded are reserved to the states. There is no such concept as "extra-constitutional." I suggest you read the constitution and look particularly at the 9th and 10th amendments. What the heck---pay particular attention to the entire document. You are 180 degrees off.

You are completely wrong. You don't understand the USC, and how it has come to be interpreted over 200 years.

The fact that, for example, the USC does not specifically mandate a department of education does not make the formation of a department of education 'unconstitutional.' The fact that the USC doesn't specifically mandate the creation of the Fed doesn't mean that a national bank is somehow 'unconstitutional.'

Those things, and any others within a wide range of conduct, may be wise or unwise, and may be elective courses of action we as a society choose to take or not to take - those are policy decisions. But they don't make any of that stuff 'unconstitutional.'

It;s your kind of overstatements that harm the cause, and not help it. If you can't (or won't) accept that, you have bigger problems than I can address here.

I have a law degree and have been admitted to the NY Bar for 10 years. If you like to think you are an authority on constitutional law, enjoy yourself. Maybe even file suit to bring an end to all these 'unconstitutional' roles our government has elected to take. Good luck - you are going to need it, son.

64 posted on 11/14/2004 7:11:57 PM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: HitmanNY

First, I am not your son. Second, you obviously have not read any Supreme Court decisions prior to the mid 1930s. Third, being from New York I can understand why you know nothing about the constitution.Finally, because the necessary and proper clause, not to mention the commerce clause, have been misinterpreted by recent courts, doesn't mean the post 1930s interpretation is correct.

I could care less that you're admitted to a bar. Let me know when you've been admitted to the USSC bar---and argued a case before it. We'll compare notes.

65 posted on 11/14/2004 8:11:24 PM PST by Founding Father
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: annyokie

Way to go. they'll make great husbands too. Good Job

66 posted on 11/15/2004 4:35:27 AM PST by marty60
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: shellcracker

I don't think many are buying that.

We have tons of psychotropic drugs which will only continue to be produced if the manufacturers get rich from them.

The need to 'invent' new mental disorders is greater now than it ever was and it is fueled by the pharmaceutical companies.

A lot of these issues have underlying spiritual problems but since we aren't supposed to talk about God in the Grand and All Wise Government School System many kids will never learn there is an alternative method for dealing with your problems.

Surely you aren't honestly convinced that depriving kids of the family time which they need to thrive is not affecting them in major ways.

67 posted on 11/15/2004 4:54:30 AM PST by tutstar ( <{{--->< Violations of Florida Statutes ongoing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Mears

Yes but back then if you got out of line there were likely neighbors who would call it to yours and your mom's attention. I'm not a 'Village theory' believer aka Hillary's Village Socialism. The moral fabric of the US then was so opposite to what it is now. Kids home alone with no supervision viewing violent tv, tv which disrespects authority figures, internet porn, and who knows what else is having an effect which emotionally immature and/or unstable children are unable to cope with.

68 posted on 11/15/2004 4:58:26 AM PST by tutstar ( <{{--->< Violations of Florida Statutes ongoing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

You are colossaly wrong if you think that stuff like a department of education is somehow 'unconstitutional.'

I agree with you regarding the necessary and proper clause and the commerce clause, but that's not to say that the US Goverment is somehow automatically acting 'unconstitutionally' when they act beyond the mandate set by the USC.

It's you who clearly don't 'get it,' and I don't doubt that you are unwilling (or unable) to recognize the clear difference between acting contrary to the rules in the USC, and acting outside of them.

If you insist on clinging to 80 year old outdated precedent, well, that speaks volumes for you, I suppose. If you have any legal clients, I hope you let them know that you personally and willingly honor bad law. I am sure they would love to hear that one!

69 posted on 11/15/2004 10:02:05 AM PST by HitmanLV (I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed or numbered. My life is my own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Founding Father

This article puts autism in this group, and how does

"unconstitutional programs resulting in greatly higher taxes, causing both parents to work to make ends meet (don't forget the women's lib mantra that you must abandon the kiddos and work for your life to have any meaning)"

cause autism??????

70 posted on 11/15/2004 10:04:07 AM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom'sWorthIt

It is very hard to get a diagnosis of a problem for your child.

My daughter has severe speech problems and some other issues. She would qualify for much help except that we finally got an MRI for her. The MRI showed significant brain damage, so she nows qualifies for lots of help.

Unfortunately, I would much rather have a normal child than a child with significant brain damage.

71 posted on 11/15/2004 10:06:41 AM PST by luckystarmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marty60

marty60 wrote, " not leave your children to be raised in their formative years by a stranger..."

marty60 should enjoy the "Daycares Don't Care" website.
It has a similar viewpoint to Eberstadt's 'Home-Alone America', and consists of a large collection of information about the problems with day care.

The URL is:

72 posted on 12/24/2004 6:10:57 AM PST by JaredS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson