Posted on 11/10/2004 3:09:09 PM PST by NormsRevenge
I used to know a guy knew from riding Metrolink who took a combination of rail and bus from Bakersfield to Union Station (Los Angeles) EVERY work day. No kidding.
Not any more. The postwar freeway/auto system was based on the assumption of cheap oil. That assumption is not only no longer valid, it causes us to spend money defending foreign oilfields in the neighborhood of the islamofascists.
The Antelope Valley route makes the best sense to me. Population in North L.A. County will likely triple before the line is completed -- it will come right on time to carry some of the expected 100,000 plus L.A. bound commuters.
how scenic..........YUCK......listen to the Buck Owens tapes on the way i guess
LOL!
really? well i guess that goes to show I shouldn't have opened my big mouth without all the facts. Is it privately run or public?
If it is sucessful as a public train then IMO they should sell it off to a private company.
There's a reason why every city in Japan can be reached by train; they're all right next to each other (something that doesn't exactly exist around these parts). There's also a reason why the tickets are so cheap; it's heavily subsidized by the taxpayers (can you say tax hike?).
From the map it looks like the route will be right along Hwy 99 between Sacto and Bakersfield. I used to drive this route every weekend for about four months waiting for my house to be finished. A lot of dusty, worn out old towns and truck stops along this road since the 5 Fwy came along as the main route north and south.
They really need one of these high speed thingys between Vegas and LA more.. but I have a feeeling this HSR initiative in 2006 will go down to defeat.
We have oodles of debt already and no guarantees that ridership would even come close to covering the cost of operations and repayment of the indebtedness incurred.
Cool! The farmworkers will be able to live in LA and commute to Fresno!
Ha. That spur to the SF airport took what, 30 years to build? Your grandchildren are going to be old-timers before they have anything up and running.
and routes from Los Angeles' Union Station to downtown San Diego.
I thought they already had an AMTRAK run from LA -> SD. Whatever.
I was there (Union Station) just last week. Nice building. They were shooting a movie in part of it when I was there.
Im not against trains, etc, if you can finagle something that works.
First, it isnt cheap (to build, operate, or ride). To go from Tustin to Union Station is $14.25 round-trip, each. Its not particularly fast but you do get to cruise across streets while the motoring public waits for you to clear the crossing.
I like to ride in my old age rather than driving, but LA doesnt have the parking problems associated with San Francisco, for instance. At least not that Ive noticed yet.
The best part about Union Station is that it is near Olivera (?) street and you can get some nice huevos rancheros - cheap. Mmm. Nothing I love more than riding and eating cheap delicious food.
Its also within walking distance of that historic market they have theres some delicious food there too. You can get Hawaiian tacos for $0.50 each. You can go to a stall called Roast (something-or-other) and get delicious tacos for $2.00 that are unbelievably filling, given the price.
One vegetable/fruit stand had bananas for 10 pounds for $0.99. Try that at Albertsons.
I love those (mostly) Mexican markets. I need to learn Spanish, Ive decided.
Its funny because even though Im obviously not Spanish/Mexican and cant communicate with them in Spanish, they (workers in shops/stalls/restaurants) are always attentive, earnest, helpful, and polite.
Having spent most of my life dealing with surly, sullen, combative Americans, I find it refreshing, so in that respect its worth the $14.25 each to make the trip occasionally.
What a boondoggle. This train, if built, will cost twice as much as estimated and carry half of the passengers that is estimated.
"Voters will decide a bond measure in 2006 to pay for part of the project. Construction on major parts of the electric train system could start in 2008."
And our gas taxes (supposed to pay for our roads) will pay for the rest giving the riders a nice taxpayer subsidized project.
Number one oil source for the United States is Canada. Venezuala is another biggie. Opening up ANWAR will make us less reliant on imported oil. There is plenty of oil. It's refinerys that are a big part of cost.
A spur to Reno would be nice as well. Nevada should then connect Reno and Vegas with a high speed line. A cheap two hour commute between the two cities for less than Southwest. Also, many Californians could live in Reno or Vegas and work in S.F, Sacto or LA.
Once that is accomplished, maybe we can talk about flinging tens of billions into what would be CA's version of The Big Dig boondoggle.
Japan is a postage stamp compared to the USA, and the interconnecting distances between cities in Europe are similar. High speed rail is simply impractical in a country this size.
The infrastructure will be HUGELY EXPENSIVE compared to air service, and once (if ever) built, will be grossly inflexible with changes in demand.
Fuggedaboutit!
don't you love it when big gov't gets involved in projects like this?
Looks like they skipped the real northern CA: Shasta, Siskiyou counties (a.k.a. the State of Jefferson).
REAL WIDE FREEWAYS!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.