Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Click the link for a PDF of the decision.
1 posted on 11/01/2004 5:14:16 PM PST by RightFighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: RightFighter

Dead people and illegals hurt most.


2 posted on 11/01/2004 5:14:51 PM PST by RightthinkinAmerican (Is the Republican attack machine an assault weapon?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

YeeHaw!!


3 posted on 11/01/2004 5:15:11 PM PST by mimmson (www.nationalterroralert.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Enforce the law?

gee,who'd a thunk it


4 posted on 11/01/2004 5:15:23 PM PST by skaterboy (BUSH 306 KERRY 232)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

So what does this mean?


5 posted on 11/01/2004 5:15:25 PM PST by pctech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

I assume the State Supreme Court ruling is overturning the federal district court judge? If so, very good news, even though it was close (5-4!)


6 posted on 11/01/2004 5:16:10 PM PST by laconic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

If they can't cheat, they can't win. And although we have too many liberal judges in this country, there is still the matter of some level of fairness left. Thank goodness.

We're going to do great tomorrow. And we'll know by midnight Tuesday.


8 posted on 11/01/2004 5:16:31 PM PST by Peach (The Clintons pardoned more terrorists than they ever captured or killed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter; XJarhead

PING!!!!


10 posted on 11/01/2004 5:16:41 PM PST by fooman (Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Yeeehaaaaaaaaaaah!


12 posted on 11/01/2004 5:17:08 PM PST by grellis ("If ketchup tasted like chocolate sprinkles, would you put it on ice cream?"--Shryke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

What's the gist of it?


13 posted on 11/01/2004 5:17:12 PM PST by secret garden (My heroes have always been cowboys)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter
Site Meter Ken Blackwell for U.S. Senate and kick old man Glenn's a$$ out of there...
14 posted on 11/01/2004 5:17:12 PM PST by KMC1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

So now does this go to the US Supreme Court or is it finished?


15 posted on 11/01/2004 5:17:23 PM PST by PilloryHillary (John Kerry: Still a traitor after 33 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

Good news ping.


18 posted on 11/01/2004 5:17:34 PM PST by TexasNative2000 (When it's all said and done, someone starts another conversation.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Excellent! :-)


19 posted on 11/01/2004 5:17:56 PM PST by BlessedBeGod (George W. Bush -- The Terror of the Terrorists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

David Boies et al are very disturbed at this turn of events.
Not used to Republicans standing up for themselves like this.


21 posted on 11/01/2004 5:18:31 PM PST by westmichman (Pray for global warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Is this a very recent decision? I could've swore I heard on Brit's show that the lower courts ruled in favor of the Dems in blocking challenges. If this is what it sounds like, that was a quick reversal.


27 posted on 11/01/2004 5:19:30 PM PST by cwb (Only a Democrat could think that "truth" is partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

This is a HUGE WIN!


29 posted on 11/01/2004 5:19:32 PM PST by Vapor3 (I will never be a Spanish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter; jmstein7
Enforce the law? WTF?


31 posted on 11/01/2004 5:19:42 PM PST by Petronski (A Monday morning quarterback has never led any team to victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Wow, this is super news!


32 posted on 11/01/2004 5:19:50 PM PST by conservativepoet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Can re-write laws from the bench? Gee, imagine that.


36 posted on 11/01/2004 5:20:50 PM PST by arichtaxpayer (We will not tire, we will not falter, and we will not fail.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

10 bucks says RESNICK, ACTING C.J., and F.E. SWEENEY, J. are "activist" judges.


39 posted on 11/01/2004 5:21:28 PM PST by chet_in_ny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

I don't get this. This is a decision by the Ohio Supreme Court - the highest state court in Ohio - but I thought that the Dems got a temporary restraining order against challenges at the polling place in U.S. District Court, and that the matter was presently being reviewed by the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals.

Anyone want to 'splain this to me?


40 posted on 11/01/2004 5:21:35 PM PST by BCrago66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Holy Tamales!

A set of judges who actually rule on what the law IS, not what their partisan ideology WANTS IT TO BE?

What's this world comin' to?

This is really, REALLY good news!! The Dem fraud machine in Ohio just got kicked in the cajones.


42 posted on 11/01/2004 5:21:43 PM PST by jstolzen (All it takes for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing - Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

This is why winning the elsction is so damn important. Conservative judges who foolow the law and the Constitution.


54 posted on 11/01/2004 5:26:30 PM PST by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Thank God. Fifty years and not a peep out of the Democrats until now??

They should have changed it back when they were voting it into law...


59 posted on 11/01/2004 5:30:45 PM PST by dandelion (http://johnkerryquestionfairy.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

YES!! Whooo F'in hooooo!!


60 posted on 11/01/2004 5:30:55 PM PST by Gimme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Too late for RATs to whine to SCOTUS!!!


91 posted on 11/01/2004 5:37:50 PM PST by clintonh8r
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Doltt, put some ice on it baby!


93 posted on 11/01/2004 5:38:04 PM PST by sausageseller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter
FANTASTIC news!!! Just heard it too.

Nam Vet

98 posted on 11/01/2004 5:39:00 PM PST by Nam Vet (MSM reporters think the MOIST dream they had the night before is a "reliable source".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Another Festivus miracle!!!


100 posted on 11/01/2004 5:39:14 PM PST by LoudRepublicangirl (loudrepublicangirl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

If Micheal Moore can put his cameras there to watch people, why can't we?

$20 says that this leads to calls of voter "disenfranchisement" and Jesse Jackson pays a visit to Ohio if Kerry loses.


101 posted on 11/01/2004 5:39:32 PM PST by Quick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Fox just said the Appeals court ruled for the Republicans.....


104 posted on 11/01/2004 5:41:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (A Proud member of Free Republic ~~The New Face of the Fourth Estate since 1996.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter
FREEPERS, make sure you hit this poll immediately. Bump it to the top of the news page. More Americans need to hear about it! A Kerry endorsement (Bin Laden)
108 posted on 11/01/2004 5:41:50 PM PST by Capitalism2003 (America is too great for small dreams. - Ronald Reagan, speech to Congress. January 1, 1984.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

Does this mean that Mary Poppins won't get to vote?


110 posted on 11/01/2004 5:42:15 PM PST by Ben Chad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

This is a decision of the OSC, but the latest dcsision actually came down from the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals saying that Observers ARE allowed to be inside the Precinct.

RamS


120 posted on 11/01/2004 5:44:37 PM PST by RamingtonStall (Ride Hard and far! ..... and with GPS, Know where you are!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

AMEN. This and similar recent situations are just appalling. There must be some legal redress available with respect to these lower judges spec., lack of fitness to continue serving. When this is all over, reviews, invetigations - whatever it takes - these jokers ought to be sent back to school, or removed from their jobs.


127 posted on 11/01/2004 5:47:22 PM PST by Sid Knows Decency
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

To all, these rules about the challengers have been in place the last 51 years! It seems the rats are trying to change the rules, after the game again! TO ALL GOP LAWYERS, YOU ROCK!! GO BUSH!


133 posted on 11/01/2004 5:49:45 PM PST by Bush gal in LA (Armed with what? SPITBALLS? Zell Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter
Did anyone else hear Allison on Fox just a few minutes ago?? I was shocked,... she seemed ticked off at the decision?

How is it so evil to have people there to watch? They claim intimidation,.. but what can we possibly do? There will be police and election officials. If they won't let you vote, ask for both and let's find the reason why they wouldn't let you. Chances are they will run(because they aren't legal, registered, etc....), and if you're running there's a good chance you have something to hide. We aren't out to limit voters. We just want them to be legit and not dragged off the street with no knowledge of what they are actually doing. I agree that the ignorant have a right to vote,....but there should be a limit on it, and the Dims cashed all those chips in long ago!!

Intimidation. How? Everyone and their dog will be in Ohio. If someone tries to prevent you from voting,.... scream. Chances are,....you haven't registered and aren't supposed to be voting. Why else would the Dims object to confirming voters??? Is that such a freakin' crime??? Confirming that the people voting are registered and supposed to vote?? Confirming that all is fair???? What is wrong with that??? Hey Dims,... what is wrong with that???? Because it's easier to say people were prevented(more than likely people that never registered, or were not eligible in the first place) than it is to prove they weren't. It is sickening what the Dim's have become. It was insulting before,... they are unGodly now. Sad.
143 posted on 11/01/2004 5:56:08 PM PST by SmellsLikeOwen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

The current picture of the Ohio State Supremes shows 5 Republicans and 2 Democrats.

That could come in handy later on.


159 posted on 11/01/2004 6:12:12 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army and Proudly Supporting BUSH/CHENEY 2004!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: RightFighter

A hugh victory for the GOP, Ohio will go Bush now.


169 posted on 11/01/2004 6:30:24 PM PST by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson