Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUMBOCRAT CORRUPTION ALERT Jim McGreevey and His Main Man (sex, lies and videotape)
NEW YORK MAGAZINE ^ | 9/14/04 | Craig Horowitz

Posted on 09/14/2004 9:39:57 AM PDT by Liz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Calpernia; Coleus

CURRENT LAWS ON CHILD PORN:


(1) The Possession, Manufacture, and Distribution of Child Pornography: Child pornography has been defined under federal statute as a visual depiction of a minor (child younger than 18) engaged in sexually explicit conduct (18 U.S.C. 2256).

(2) Online Enticement of Children For Sexual Acts: Use of the Internet to entice, invite, or persuade a child to meet for sexual acts, or to help arrange such a meeting, is a serious offense (18 U.S.C. 2425).

(3) Child Prostitution: Prostitution is generally defined as performing, offering, or agreeing to perform a sexual act for any money, property, token, object, article, or anything of value (18 U.S.C. 2431, 2423(a).

(4) Child-Sex Tourism: It is against the law for any United States citizen to travel abroad to engage in sexual activity with any child under the age of 18 (18 U.S.C. 2423b). Individuals who partake in this illegal activity are subject to prosecution in the United States even if they committed the crime on foreign soil.

(5) Child Sexual Molestation (not in the family): Child sexual exploitation (not in the family), also known as extra-familial child sexual abuse, includes all sexual exploitation of a child by someone other than a family member.

(6) Unsolicited Obscene Material Sent to a Child: It is an unfortunate reality of the Internet that children will encounter obscene material online. Many times this material is attached as an image(s) or hyperlink(s) sent to a child in an unsolicited E-mail or "spam." To combat this problem authorities need to take reports of unsolicited obscene material sent to a child. It is a violation of criminal law for any person to knowingly or attempt to send or transfer obscene material to another individual who has not attained the age of 16 years (18 U.S.C.A. 1470).

(7) Misleading Domain Name: It is a federal offense to use a misleading domain name on the Internet with the intent to deceive a minor into viewing material that is harmful to minors, regardless of whether the material meets the legal definition of obscenity (18 U.S.C. 2252B). Using a misleading domain name that directs a child to a web site containing harmful materials to children.


21 posted on 09/14/2004 11:32:40 AM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Liz

We have to keep posting about the connection between Corzine and Kushner.


22 posted on 09/14/2004 12:01:21 PM PDT by OldFriend (It's the soldier, not the reporter who has given US freedom of the press)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend

Positively. Will do.


23 posted on 09/14/2004 12:31:18 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

Comment #24 Removed by Moderator

To: Calpernia; Coleus; MattinNJ; mondonico; Askel5
As far as giving Cipel a job on the state payroll goes, Twersky argues that politicians put relatives and friends and contributors in jobs all the time as payback for their allegiance. “Is it okay when it’s a payback for money but not for sex?” he asks.

Now isn't that cute?

Comparing unqualified foreigner Cipel on the state government payroll with acesss to US national security as payback for sexual favors, with giving a supporter---who is an American---- an administrative job in the Dept of Labor.

How dumb can they get, comparing apples with oranges.......or should I say comparing a conniving male prostitute with a patriotic secretary.

Lord Jesus, please deliver us from this elliptical, agenda-laden thinking.

Disgusting.

25 posted on 09/14/2004 4:29:48 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Liz

Let's see.

Cipel head of state security

Kushner head of port authority

NJ had security with no background checks and records

The infamous '2 year missile sting' had Rehman as saying he knew how to get the 'shoe' through our ports when he had it requested from Russia

Yup. Makes sense.


26 posted on 09/14/2004 5:13:44 PM PDT by Calpernia (NUTCRACKER IN CHIEF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I'm shocked! - Well not really.....


27 posted on 09/14/2004 5:26:15 PM PDT by Sub-Driver (Unelect All NJ Politicians....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia
Let's see. Cipel head of state security Kushner head of Port Authority NJ had security with no background checks and records. The infamous '02 year missile sting' had Rehman as saying he knew how to get the 'shoe' through our ports when he had it requested from Russia Yup. Makes sense.

Nice going. Now that's clearheaded, logical thinking that connects the dots. Kushner is pure evil....he sponsored Cipel's work visa while Cipel was being setup for the HomeSec job, at the same time Kushner was prepped to takeover the PA.

No wonder McGreevey quit and gave the phony excuse about his homosexuality. This craven, corrupt individual cannot stand the scrutiny.

28 posted on 09/14/2004 5:29:54 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Nice Claude Rains impersonation.


29 posted on 09/14/2004 5:36:17 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Coleus

There's more to come...


30 posted on 09/14/2004 6:56:35 PM PDT by Sub-Driver (Unelect All NJ Politicians....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Liz

>>>No wonder McGreevey quit and gave the phony excuse about his homosexuality.

Pardon me? What do you mean by that? I'm sorry, McGreevey has not quite. He never signed the paper.

Matter of fact, the propaganda has already started saying, "He shouldn't step down because he is gay".

Unles the Feds step in, he is not quitting. This was a horse and pony show.


31 posted on 09/14/2004 7:40:01 PM PDT by Calpernia (NUTCRACKER IN CHIEF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

If he were to say stay on, it would ignite a backlash.


32 posted on 09/14/2004 7:47:01 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Liz

I hope you are right. But why flame the rumor? I see it as water testing. The talk show radio station has been shilling for him for almost a week.


33 posted on 09/14/2004 7:55:33 PM PDT by Calpernia (NUTCRACKER IN CHIEF.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson