Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kerry's words prolonged the misery of Vietman POWs
Naples Daily News ^ | September 7, 2004 | WAYNE SMITH

Posted on 09/07/2004 10:10:15 AM PDT by The Great Yazoo

"Hanoi Hanna" was screeching away on the awful squawk box in my four-walled POW stench. She was directing her babble to servicemen who were still engaged in the conflict. "GIs lay down your weapons and revolt. Do not be the last soldier to die for a cause that Americans think is unjust."

This is a paraphrase but the theme was repeated often late in my internment in the 1970s. I could not recollect it at the time but I found out after my repatriation that these same words were the hallmark of John Kerry's 1971 testimony before the Fulbright Committee: "How do you ask a man to be the last man to die for a mistake?"

I was more fortunate than many who were POWs held in North Vietnam between 1964 and 1973. I only spent five years and two months in captivity. Some endured almost nine years.

I was a junior officer and not subject to as many beatings nor tortured as badly for propaganda purposes as was the case for the more senior officers. Their confessions of war crimes would have a more dynamic effect. They stretched the limits of human endurance in their resistance. I was "punished" for getting caught communicating by tapping through the walls and was threatened to be shot as a war criminal if I did not write and sign confessions for my "atrocities."

We supported each other and resisted as best we could to keep from being exploited for their propaganda effort.

Here are some excerpts from our Code of Conduct:

"... I will accept neither parole nor special favors from the enemy. ... I will keep faith with my fellow prisoners. I will give no information nor take part in any action which might be harmful to my comrades. ... I am required to give name, rank, service number and date of birth ... I will evade answering further questions to the utmost of my ability. I will make no oral or written statements disloyal to my country and its allies or harmful to their cause."

Though not a POW, John Kerry was a Naval Reserve officer after he was discharged from active-duty status. Can anyone deny that he blatantly provided aid and comfort to the enemy? He is pictured in the war museum in Ho Chi Minh City as a hero of the communist cause and credited as one who helped defeat the United States.

The North Vietnamese knew they could not defeat the United States militarily. They were encouraged to hang on only because they thought that they could win through the liberal media and anti-war protesters in the streets of America. John Kerry was their poster boy in the effort.

One ploy used by the North Vietnamese for their propaganda effort was the release of POWs in groups of three to anti-war groups. Our policy, which was established by our ranking officers, was that we would be released in this order: "First the sick and wounded, thereafter in order of shoot-down date." Only 11 POWs violated this policy and accepted early release. One POW was ordered to take the deal against his wishes. Can you guess who would have been first in line to leave in those circumstances?

Bombing over North Vietnam ceased for almost three years while the war dragged on until B-52s conducted night bombing raids for 10 days in December 1972. Only a few weeks later the peace accord was signed.

Was the combat prolonged because of the divisiveness in this country? Was my misery lengthened? Absolutely.

I have not spoken to him about it but I cannot fathom why John McCain, who was on my adjoining wall early in my stay, is protecting Mr. Kerry. McCain was forced to read over the "box" but he actually provided some comic relief by putting the accent on the wrong sy-LAB-ble. I do know that he testified upon his return how damning and demoralizing the material from American anti-war activists were to us.

I don't care about Kerry's shenanigans to arrange his shortened tour. I care about what he did after his return, which resulted in needless loss of life. He sold us out, and through his outrageous and unfounded testimony gave the North Vietnamese ammunition to demoralize and exploit me and discredit our armed forces.

It's not about Vietnam; it's about the character of a man. I sincerely hope that character matters to most Americans.

Wayne Smith is a 1965 graduate of the Air Force Academy. He was a fighter pilot and flew 90 missions over North Vietnam and Laos before being shot down in January 1968. His honors for service in combat include the Legion of Merit, two Silver Stars, two Distinguished Flying Crosses, two Bronze Stars, seven Air Medals and the Purple Heart. Now retired, his corporate offices include president and chief operating officer of BF Goodrich Chemicals. He briefly flew 727s as a pilot for Eastern Airlines.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hanoijohn; kerry; northvietnam; pows
He sold us out, and through his outrageous and unfounded testimony gave the North Vietnamese ammunition to demoralize and exploit me and discredit our armed forces.

It's not about Vietnam; it's about the character of a man. I sincerely hope that character matters to most Americans.

Wayne Smith's personal testimony is irrefutable.

1 posted on 09/07/2004 10:10:16 AM PDT by The Great Yazoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: The Great Yazoo

Oneil is on with Dennis prager right now.


2 posted on 09/07/2004 10:11:25 AM PDT by cripplecreek (The economy won't matter if you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Yazoo

I purchased the video, "THE HANOI HILTON" at Wal-Mart a few weeks ago. It was on sale for $5.99. I recall seeing the movie on television many years ago. I had a chance to watch the movie yesterday and now the movie, more than ever is relevant to the anti-war activities of John Kerry during the Vietnam War. Especially how the POW's were tortured many times due to the actions of John Kerry, Jane Fonda and their friends in the media.

If you have an opportunity to view it I recommend highly that you see this movie. It is a glimpse of what the POW's went through while held prisoner by the Communist North Vietnamese.

The video is available from Amazon and other online video stores.

From website: "Shot in the Dark" http://www.shotinthedark.info/

"In 1987, Lionel Chetwynd's excellent Hanoi Hilton received widely-mixed reviews (many of them politically-motivated). Worse, its distributor essentially sat on the movie, under pressure from Hollywood leftists, for its treatment of Jane Fonda. The movie depicted life at North Vietnam's Hoa Lo prison accurately - but it changed the last names of the prisoners, and of their visitors, including Jane Fonda. An actress who represents Fonda ("Paula") does everything Fonda is said to have done while in the Hilton. That was one of several stories that Hollywood didn't want told (that and, of course, the moral of the story; the men survived because of their military training and warrior ethic). "Hanoi Hilton" was buried, received a tiny theatrical release, and is hard to find on video today. (Do it if you can - it's an excellent movie)."







On the back of the box there is the following endorsement from President Ronald Reagan:

"Every American should see this powerful and moving film as a tribute to our POW's."

President Ronald Reagan

Synopsis:

HANOI HILTON (1987)

Genre(s): POW/MIA, Vietnam War

Cast: Michael Moriarty, Paul LeMat, Jeffrey Jones, Lawrence Pressman, Stephen Davies, David Soul, Rick Fitts, Aki Aleong, Gloria Carlin; DIRECTED BY: Lionel Chetwynd; WRITTEN BY: Lionel Chetwynd. PRODUCER: Cannon Films.

Review: A brutal drama about the sufferings of American POWs in Vietnamese prison camps. Non-stop torture, filth, and degradation.

Reviews on Amazon.com website:

Editorial Reviews

Description

A true story about American soldiers interned in North Vietnam during the years 1964 through 1973, and their struggle to survive within the infamous prison complex they dubbed the Hanoi Hilton.

COMMUNISM WAS EVIL, EVIL, EVIL, June 7, 2004
Reviewer: Steven R. Travers (CALIFORNIA) -

One lonely conservative voice has been trying to shout out from the "wilderness" for years. Lionel Chetwynd is a writer/producer who made "The Hanoi Hilton", which actually described the North Vietnamese as the evil torturers they were. The "Hilton" was the moniker given the infamous prison camp where American POW's were kept while Jane Fonda was flirting with our enemies. Liberal film reviewers criticized it. Do not believe them. It is good stuff.

The Hanoi Hilton, January 18, 2004
Reviewer:

I was in the Air Force during the war and have over 100 combat missions. This is the most accurate presentation of the war that is available. It is a story that needed telling and still needs to be told. It describes the situation of the American prisoners in Vietnam in an accurate and truthful manner. Everyone should see it.

The Hanoi Hilton, April 25, 2001
Reviewer:

This movie shows what terrible hardships these prisoners had to endure. I had the privilege to talk to one of the wives of these heroes and she confirmed a lot of events shown in this movie. Also stated that she was not allowed to even mention that her husband was shot down for six-months. Tell her that this movie was "too long and over emotional"!! Most Americans just did not want to face reality during this sad time in our Country's history. I was there during 1966-1968 and in Saigon 1970. --This text refers to the VHS Tape edition

Internet Movie Database
User Comments:

Date: 14 March 2000
Summary: The Libs Hate This One

While this doesn't have the action of 'Rambo' or the surrealism of 'Apocalypse Now', or 'Full Metal Jacket', it does hit dead-on as the most realistic of the Vietnam movies yet.

Most especially, it accurately contrasts the quiet heroism of the POWs with the hypocrisy of the Hollywood Left, and their comrades in the news media; so much in fact, that it is really pretty amazing this film ever got made at all.

Hollywood hates this film.

You can see a typical Hollywood review of this movie, where it is referred to as "Right-wing bullshit." Go to: http://www.ruthlessreviews.com/80saction/hanoihilton.html


3 posted on 09/07/2004 10:15:26 AM PDT by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Yazoo
Is John Kerry a war criminal? Consider the following.

After the Tet offensive North Vietnam was beaten, but with the Socialist press in America and the VVAW the North Vietnamese Communists decided to hold on.

This meant that instead of a US victory in South Vietnam and freedom for the South Vietnamese we had 10,000 - 15,000 more US deaths. America’s POW's were being tortured while listening to tapes of John "Traitor" Kerry calling them baby killers.

The VVAW, an antiwar group, which Kerry was one of the national leaders of, was receiving directions from the North Vietnamese Communist Government. VVAW in contact with in contact with NV Communist Government

The directions were on how the VVAW should protest the Vietnam War.

The interaction became so depraved, that the North Vietnamese Communist contacted the VVAW via a phone call and advised the VVAW that they were getting ready to start an attack on US troops and that the VVAW was to be prepared to increase the protests against the increase in bombing that the NV Communists were sure would happen. This put our men in further danger because of John Kerry and VVAW actions. VVAW gets directions from the VS Communists

John Kerry had no concern for the lives of his fellow soldiers in Vietnam or the POW's, John Kerry only cared about himself and his ambition to become POTUS, whatever the cost.

How many deaths of United States servicemen does John Kerry have on his hands?

How many families has John Kerry's behavior as a VVAW leader and a traitor to his country caused untold pain and suffering to?

How many unnecessary tears have been cried because John Kerry betrayed our trust to help a Communist government?

Does John Kerry still have ties to Communists in America?

John Kerry was an officer in the US Navy during his protests of the Vietnam War, having not received his discharge until 1978.

Why didn't John Kerry speak out just one time against the war crimes of his "Comrades in Arms the North Vietnamese Communists"?
4 posted on 09/07/2004 10:25:49 AM PDT by stockpirate (Dick Morris; Before he spoke, supporting Bush was a duty one owed to the fallen. Now, it is an honor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Yazoo
Wayne Smith's personal testimony is irrefutable.

You would think so. However, John Kerry and his buddies in the media will do their best to slime Mr. Smith. You can be sure that every transgression this guy may have committed since his release, no matter how minor, will be published on the front page of the New York Times. They will do ANYTHING to assure Kerry wins.

5 posted on 09/07/2004 10:31:38 AM PDT by John Thornton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Great Yazoo
Bombing over North Vietnam ceased for almost three years while the war dragged on until B-52s conducted night bombing raids for 10 days in December 1972. Only a few weeks later the peace accord was signed.

And that is the sad thing

Nixon should have cranked up the B52s the day after he was sworn in
Thousands of lives would have been saved
6 posted on 09/07/2004 10:51:29 AM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: uncbob
Nixon had a Democrat-controlled Senate and House, had barely been elected, and faced an implacable NYT, WP, CBS, NBC, and ABC. North Vietnam was supported by both China and the Soviet Union (and not the decrepit Soviet Union that imploded during Bush 41, but the pre-Reagan irresistible force of modernity). Nixon's freedom of action was limited.

Even so, had Nixon (and Johnson before him) determined to win the war, we would have done so.
7 posted on 09/07/2004 11:02:46 AM PDT by The Great Yazoo (Hey, Hey J-K-F, How Many Vets did you Diss Today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: The Great Yazoo
Nixon's freedom of action was limited.

Nope
No more limited than when he sent the B52s out and in addition it was before WATERGATE
A new president is strongest the day after he takes office

Nixon was a failure
8 posted on 09/07/2004 12:35:35 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

Agreed that Nixon was a failure (price controls, EPA, welfare expansion, just a few domestic examples), but he grew in power during his first term (as evidenced by the difference in the 1968 and 1972 election returns) dispite unceasing media opposition.


9 posted on 09/07/2004 12:50:31 PM PDT by The Great Yazoo (Hey, Hey J-K-F, How Many Vets did you Diss Today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson