Posted on 08/24/2004 9:17:34 AM PDT by Pikamax
No controlling legal authority.
It depends what the definition of "is" "is"!
"always making one wonder what lay on the other side."
Hmm...was Kerry tempted to join Col. Kurtz' outfit?
I believe that Theresa has realised for a long time that she married a loser. The fact has been hidden because he was elected Senator from Massachusetts, a state where a Kennedy endorsement is as good as a get out of jail free card,and is a sure way to the Senate. However even though he is a loser she was privy to all the perks of a senators wife, and she still will be after the election because Kerry was smart enough not to resign. However if the voters in Massachusetts ever come to their senses and votekerry out. All Kerry will see is what the Swift Boat Commanders saw when one of their boats hit a mine
The stern of Theresa Kerry as she opens the throttle in the other direction.
A Swift boat contribution of $50.00 was mailed this past Saturday.
Strange that this appeared in the Washington Post. Are the rats fleeing the sinking Swift Boat?
Where is the DNC cover up machine? Why are they not cleaning up after Kerry, and silencing the witnesses?
I wonder if someone has the link to Kerry's references to Apocalypse Now, he evidently was very impressed by the movie, and he says he identified with it. It might have been in the "hat" interview, although I think he also wrote a review of the movie way back when... maybe someone can correct me.
But it is notable that in Kerry's dream life he equates his fictional forays into Cambodia with fictional Hollywood forays into Cambodia. I suppose that would make sense.
Thanks for your support!
The other charges always had an element of he said/she said, but the Cambodia thing always seemed like a crock.
"...telling the American people that I was not there..."
Because you WEREN'T, Johnny...
Only page A17 though. I'll be more shocked when this makes A2 or A1. Burying it just guarantees fewer will read it, but lets the WaPo put up a remote appearance of balance.
I've heard the clintoons' are behind trashing Kerry.
"But I suspect the "worm" has its eyes on Hilary-2004."
I think you hit the nail on the head. Looks like a lib retreat/regroup.
Guest column from a guy at the American Enterprise Institute.
True. But, I am surprised the editors allowed it to run in the Post. They can halt anything they choose from being printed....surprising they let it run.
Well that youthfulness and fever that the WP and Kerry were all caught up in cost AMERICAN LIVES.
This was not a game. This was a war against the growth of Communism in Southeast Asia. Millions died at hands of the butchers that took over after we, with the help of John Friggin Kerry and the Washington Post" walked away from a war that could have been and should have been won.
Here is my message to the youthful and feverish Washington Post. Time to grow up.
No, they're not -- their people (Podesta, Lockhart, Carville) are all defending Kerry to the hilt.
By Joshua Muravchik
Tuesday, August 24, 2004; Page A17
emphasys is page 17
The Clintoons must be laughing their asses off and celebrating their coup. They've got the right sliming Kerry for them and they've got the left blaming Bush for them. It's a win-win scenario for them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.