Skip to comments.
Google may plunge at launch? Pretrade offer $55.00
yahoo ^
| 19-Aug-2004
| epluribus_2
Posted on 08/19/2004 8:42:51 AM PDT by epluribus_2
if I read this right, betting is that Google falls faster than Kerry on a snowboard after it goes on sale.
GOOGLE (RTM/ECN) Symbol: GOOG Last Trade: N/A After Hours Change: N/A Today's Change: N/A Bid: 55.00 Ask: N/A
TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: goog; google; ipo; thud
anyone know how to interpret this?
To: epluribus_2
It's probably worth $10. People aren't as stupid as they were four years ago.
To: Mr. Jeeves
Somebody was determined to make sure this stock barely got off the ground.
Lots of suspects that I won't mention.
3
posted on
08/19/2004 8:46:02 AM PDT
by
OldFriend
(WAR IS THE REMEDY OUR ENEMIES HAVE CHOSEN)
To: Mr. Jeeves
Depends on the PE ratio and how many stock issued. The problem 4yrs ago was that companies were banging at 500pe with 500gillion shares. I don't think Google offered this type of IPO. I still wouldn't trade this stock though. Way too volatile. I'll stick with broad market indexes and close my positions at each days close. I like to sleep at night.
4
posted on
08/19/2004 8:48:08 AM PDT
by
mlbford2
(In TX, orange alert means releasing the safety on your shotgun)
To: Mr. Jeeves
There are two main differences between Google and the dot-bombs a few years back.
1) Google actually has a licensable product beyond their website. Their data searching and sorting algorithms are among the best on the planet and are a product that many corporations would be interested in obtaining. This is a relatively untapped market for them at the moment.
2) Google already makes a profit, and isn't a money eating black hole like so many of its predecessors.
I don't think GOOG is worth quite what they're asking for it, but it's certainly worth more than $10 (I'd place it mid-$50's).
5
posted on
08/19/2004 8:48:24 AM PDT
by
Arthalion
To: OldFriend
Well, I'll mention them - since Forbes did. Goldman Sachs and JP Morgan Chase.
To: OldFriend
Per CNBC there have been no trades. The stock is still held. They showed the NASDAQ board with GOOG up 60% twice but also said it was held for trading. Confusion reigns!
7
posted on
08/19/2004 8:48:54 AM PDT
by
babaloo
To: epluribus_2
Currently trading at $135
8
posted on
08/19/2004 8:55:12 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: epluribus_2
now ranging between $98 and $100 on volume of 1,000,000 plus.
9
posted on
08/19/2004 8:56:18 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(When it came to Intelligence, Kerry was absent)
To: epluribus_2
10
posted on
08/19/2004 8:56:26 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: Phantom Lord
you must be looking at the 20 minute delayed quotes. It is now 3,000,000 shares traded, price at $96.25
11
posted on
08/19/2004 8:58:27 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(When it came to Intelligence, Kerry was absent)
To: NonValueAdded
Where are you getting the $98 to $100? Yahoo Finance has the last trade at $140
12
posted on
08/19/2004 8:58:36 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: NonValueAdded
13
posted on
08/19/2004 8:58:50 AM PDT
by
Phantom Lord
(Advantages are taken, not handed out)
To: epluribus_2
To: Phantom Lord
Anyone remember day one of the PALM IPO?
To: Phantom Lord
www.isld.com
Definately pressure on the buy side...
16
posted on
08/19/2004 8:59:07 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: Phantom Lord
I'm looking at etrade's marketcaster real trade quotes. Yahoo is way behind.
17
posted on
08/19/2004 8:59:23 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(When it came to Intelligence, Kerry was absent)
To: Phantom Lord
Settling down at 97. That is very positive for the market overall. It will inspire more IPO's and give investors some much needed confidence.
18
posted on
08/19/2004 8:59:27 AM PDT
by
babaloo
To: Phantom Lord
Lotsa bids in the high 97's
Lotsa asks in the low 98's
19
posted on
08/19/2004 9:00:42 AM PDT
by
So Cal Rocket
(Fabrizio Quattrocchi: "Adesso vi faccio vedere come muore un italiano")
To: NonValueAdded
real trade = real time, sorry. over 4 million traded, now at $97.61
20
posted on
08/19/2004 9:01:02 AM PDT
by
NonValueAdded
(When it came to Intelligence, Kerry was absent)
To: babaloo
Current bid/ask is 49/140 (20 min delay).
21
posted on
08/19/2004 9:02:39 AM PDT
by
Petronski
(First algore invented everything, then Kerry smuggled it to Cambodia.)
To: Petronski
Delay is not your friend. Real time it is at 98.
22
posted on
08/19/2004 9:03:37 AM PDT
by
babaloo
To: babaloo
128 buy to 45 sell. going goog way...
23
posted on
08/19/2004 9:05:47 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: fooman
153/45. pressure building ...
24
posted on
08/19/2004 9:06:35 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: Mr. Jeeves
PALM isn't comparable here. It was a straight block IPO; GOOG is doing a Dutch auction.
25
posted on
08/19/2004 9:07:44 AM PDT
by
SAJ
(Too late for the NGH spreads now...next opportunity is probably LB or JO...watch 'em this week!)
To: SAJ
26
posted on
08/19/2004 9:10:52 AM PDT
by
fooman
(Get real with Kim Jung Mentally Ill about proliferation)
To: Mr. Jeeves
27
posted on
08/19/2004 9:15:23 AM PDT
by
MarkeyD
(<a href="http:\\www.michaelmoore.com>Maggot</a>)
To: Mr. Jeeves
If you base the valuation on current or past revenues, it isn't even worth $10.00 a share.
28
posted on
08/19/2004 9:17:17 AM PDT
by
wrathof59
(semper ubi sub ubi)
To: fooman
Oh, it's going to bounce around a lot. Lots of action for the action junkies...which I am not.
Call me when it hits 30 -- or when the LEAPS open up.
29
posted on
08/19/2004 9:46:45 AM PDT
by
SAJ
(Too late for the NGH spreads now...next opportunity is probably LB or JO...watch 'em this week!)
To: SAJ
Today they partied like it was 1999. Can someone explain how a search engine is worth $37 Billion????
30
posted on
08/19/2004 4:48:50 PM PDT
by
Hildy
(John Edwards is to Dick Cheney what Potsie was to the Fonz.)
To: wrathof59
Their earning are a dollar per share, so a price of $10 gives it a P/E ratio of 10, which is low.
31
posted on
08/19/2004 4:51:38 PM PDT
by
Guillermo
(OJ was innocent because Mark Furhman said the "N" word.)
To: Hildy
A very accurate observation, and comps to you.
I can't begin to explain the (immediate) mkt valuation on this stock, nor would I try.
I strongly suspect that those who did NOT bid on GOOG will be rather happier than those who did, in, let's say, 1 year's time.
32
posted on
08/19/2004 10:14:44 PM PDT
by
SAJ
(Too late for the NGH spreads now...next opportunity is probably LB or JO...watch 'em this week!)
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson