Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ban MGM/UA over Kinsey Film! (Hollywood Sinks to New Lows)
myself, after seeing EW Fall Movie Preview | 8/16/2004 | Pyro7480

Posted on 08/16/2004 1:41:18 PM PDT by Pyro7480

This November, MGM/UA will be releasing a movie based on the life of Alfred Kinsey, an "academic" who released two "studies," Sexual Behavior in the Human Male, and Sexual Behavior in the Human Female, which legitimized the sexual revolution in the 1960s, and is still being used to legitimize sexually perverted behavior. Kinsey himself was a sexual pervert himself, being a homosexual, a probable pedophile, and a S&M freak.

In Entertainment Weekly's fall movie preview, the movie is previewed. Liam Neeson plays Kinsey, and from the companion picture, Neeson indeed looks like Kinsey. The director and producer, Bill Condon, describes Kinsey as "half scientist, half preacer," when Kinsey's own research has been thoroughly debunked. In the last paragraph of the article, it states that the cast and crew is "bracing for conservative reaction to the touchy content," which includes graphic images of human genitalia. Laura Linney, who plays Kinsey's wife in the movie, states that "[p]eople just flip out. They feel like the fabric of American society is coming undone" (which is the truth, Ms. Linney!)

Like the pressure CBS faced when they were planning to show their propaganda piece on the Reagans, we need to pressure both MGM/UA (to threaten to ban ALL of their flicks) and the MPAA (to rate the movie NC-17, undercutting the money the studio could make). Hollywood has sunk to a new low with this propaganda piece.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: alfredkinsey; boycotthollywood; celebrateperversity; childabuse; childmolestation; childsexualabuse; criminalsubjects; culture; drkinsey; fraud; hollyweird; homosexual; homosexualagenda; homosexuality; indiana; indianauniversity; indoctrination; itsjustsex; kinsey; kinseyinstitute; medicalexperiments; mgm; orgies; pedophilia; personalgain; pervert; playeddoctor; prisoners; pseudoscience; quack; revolution; sciencefiction; seduction; sex; sexcrimes; sexfarm; sexpositiveagenda; sexstudies; sexual; sexualabuse; sexualdeviant; sexualizingchildren; sexualmolestation; socialengineering; taxdollarsatwork; ua; witchdoctors; youpayforthis
Past FR threads on the subject:
Kinsey film focus of O'Reilly tonight
The Kinsey-Polanski story: Judith Reisman warns of Hollywood supporting pedophile-rights
Film star to portray 'sex reformer' Kinsey (Liam Neeson)
1 posted on 08/16/2004 1:41:23 PM PDT by Pyro7480
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: steplock; bvw; canuck_conservative; holyscroller; weegee; KC_Conspirator; Bahbah; Tamsey; ...

Ping!


2 posted on 08/16/2004 1:42:10 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

What a great idea! Draw attention to a crappy movie, and make people wonder what it is that those religious conservatives don't want you to see!


3 posted on 08/16/2004 1:45:21 PM PDT by Lunatic Fringe (This tagline was censored by freerepublic.com!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

"It's okay. I'm a licensed therapist. I know what I'm doing." :)

4 posted on 08/16/2004 1:46:06 PM PDT by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lunatic Fringe

So you want people to do nothing?


5 posted on 08/16/2004 1:47:46 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
Boycott, yes. Work to get it rated NC-17, yes. Ban? No. No matter how revolting you find it (and I would tend to agree with you, myself), banning is not the answer. People will see it anyway, and all banning does it give those behind it a martyr complex to use to their benefit. We simply cannot resort to banning that with which we disagree. We can work to show others how and why it is wrong, but banning is counterproductive, to say the least.

To put it another way, as my pop once told me, if you want to show people that a man who disagrees with you is dead wrong, you don't silence him. You give him a soapbox and invite others to hear him speak, then counter his claims and show how wrong he is.

6 posted on 08/16/2004 1:48:10 PM PDT by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
a probable pedophile

What's a probable peadophile? He either was one, or he wasn't.

7 posted on 08/16/2004 1:49:31 PM PDT by Happygal (Liberals - fully au fait with their 'rights', utterly ignorant of their responsibilities)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

I know EXACTLY how to deal with the MGM/UA guys who decided this.
Put them and their children through the crap Kinsey put people through and then see how they feel afterwards.
Cruel and inhuman, but poetic irony/justice for thier decision.

Of course, common sense says we can't do that.
So we boycott them.


8 posted on 08/16/2004 1:49:45 PM PDT by Darksheare (I'll bayonet your snowmen and beat you down with a chinese yo-yo!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
It's a stupid-sounding film that no one will bother seeing unless a big stink is raised about how no one should see it.

There are more important things to worry about.

9 posted on 08/16/2004 1:50:06 PM PDT by TheBigB (I'm more frustrated than a legless Ethiopian watching a doughnut roll down a hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Please take me off your ping list.


10 posted on 08/16/2004 1:54:38 PM PDT by gcruse (http://gcruse.typepad.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: gcruse

I apologize. I saw your contribution to one of the past threads, and I thought you would be interested.


11 posted on 08/16/2004 1:57:57 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Please take me off your ping list.


12 posted on 08/16/2004 1:59:04 PM PDT by sharktrager (The road to hell is paved with good intentions. And the paving contractor lives in Chappaqua.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sharktrager

See post #11.


13 posted on 08/16/2004 2:00:19 PM PDT by Pyro7480 (Sub tuum praesidium confugimus, sancta Dei Genitrix.... sed a periculis cunctis libera nos semper...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Very intelligent decision!And effective.


14 posted on 08/16/2004 2:00:31 PM PDT by loboinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480; ItsOurTimeNow; little jeremiah; scripter; lentulusgracchus; ArGee; Bryan

Bump


15 posted on 08/16/2004 2:06:35 PM PDT by EdReform (Support Free Republic - All donations are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your support!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Laura Linney (yum!) and Liam Neeson? They don't have any better offers coming in?


16 posted on 08/16/2004 2:11:07 PM PDT by Rummyfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jokelahoma

I think you misread - he doesn't want to ban the movie, merely the entire MGM/UA studio and related companies. A much smaller undertaking than merely 'banning' a movie...


17 posted on 08/16/2004 2:19:12 PM PDT by flashbunny (Click on my name!!! I dare you!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Kinsey was a mediocre zoologist with no qualifications at all for carrrying out the type of "study" he claimed to have done. His subjects were almost exclusively homosexuals, prostitutes and other low-lifes like himself.


18 posted on 08/16/2004 2:25:21 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny
Ah, I see. Well, never mind then! If one can ban an entire corporation, well more power to one! Once successful, if we could then move on to perhaps banning entire schools of thought, that would help, too. Then again, it would be much better for humanity to simply ban, say, disease, or perhaps hunger. :-)

Is it too late to say "I'm sticking to my original post on this"?

19 posted on 08/16/2004 2:31:04 PM PDT by Jokelahoma (Animal testing is a bad idea. They get all nervous and give wrong answers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Are you sure it's not Bill Condom?


20 posted on 08/16/2004 2:39:20 PM PDT by Angry Enough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Concerned Women for America have a campaign to force congressional hearings on the fraud Kinsey perpetrated on the American public. Hope it suceeds.


21 posted on 08/16/2004 2:43:02 PM PDT by Bonaparte
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Kinsey was a disgusting man who sexually abused very young children, even infants, as part of his 'research,' then was lauded for his findings as he extrapolated all of it into theory. God help us if we don't hold him accountable by proxy - MGM will do fine.


22 posted on 08/16/2004 2:43:17 PM PDT by Angry Enough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

So we ignore this sickening propaganda piece glorifying a criminal pervert? Just like conservatives ignored the homosexual agenda for years? Ignoring it with the same success as firefighters ignoring a wildfire.

Evil ignored is evil promoted. Evil has to have the light of truth shone on it.

I plan to freep the movie if it arrives at my local theaters. Thinking about signs now.


23 posted on 08/16/2004 2:49:23 PM PDT by little jeremiah (I am a proud pervertophile-phobe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480
we need to pressure both MGM/UA (to threaten to ban ALL of their flicks

I had no idea MGM/UA made any movies anymore, other than James Bond flicks.
24 posted on 08/16/2004 2:52:11 PM PDT by Galactic Overlord-In-Chief (Kerry, you have low poll numbers but I have good news. I just saved hundreds by switching to Geico.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
Go right ahead. You'll accomplish nothing but to bring more attention to the film and give it a great tagline. The film THEY didn't want you to see!
25 posted on 08/16/2004 3:04:43 PM PDT by TheBigB (I'm more frustrated than a legless Ethiopian watching a doughnut roll down a hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Okay, I see your point. I'll just go back to sleep, after I check out what's on TV. If everyone ignored evil, we'd all be SOOOO much better off.


26 posted on 08/16/2004 3:12:32 PM PDT by little jeremiah (I am a proud pervertophile-phobe.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah; MeekOneGOP; Flyer; Xenalyte; The Mayor; RonDog; kristinn
I plan on boycotting the movie myself.

If you or anyone else can come up with a one sheet on the facts regarding that pervert Kinsey to hand out when the film hits theaters, please let me know.

It's Freepin' Time!

27 posted on 08/16/2004 3:12:55 PM PDT by Houmatt (I love my wife. You got a problem with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Hey! That's a great Idea! Let's get our knickers all a twisted over a movie most people would probably never go and see, and get them all excited about going to see it because we've got our knickers in a bunch...

Can you say "Last Temptation of Christ"? I know you can


28 posted on 08/16/2004 3:37:37 PM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
It's a movie. A film. Images on celluloid. It's no more "evil" than a gun. Inanimate objects have no capacity for good or evil, only people do. THINK!

Ignore it and I guarantee it'll be out of theaters in two or three weeks and then deservedly forgotten.

29 posted on 08/16/2004 3:37:40 PM PDT by TheBigB (I'm more frustrated than a legless Ethiopian watching a doughnut roll down a hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Lord_Baltar
If they were going to be consistent, I would think they'd be ready to picket any video stores than rent F911, or LToC, or that will carry this one.

Or they could picket the bookstores that carry and sell the Kinsey books. And MM's books, and occult books. If we're to confront evil, that would make sense, wouldn't it?

I mean, wouldn't it?

30 posted on 08/16/2004 3:41:55 PM PDT by TheBigB (I'm more frustrated than a legless Ethiopian watching a doughnut roll down a hill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB

Well, if they were really going to be consistent, they'd hang a couple of sandwich boards around their necks that read "The End is Near, Repent", and take care of it all in one felled swoop...


31 posted on 08/16/2004 3:46:14 PM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

This is an excellent page that sums up important issues from her book. Kinsey was a homosexual pedophile. Out of 1,746 children abused in the "sexual studies", only 7 were girls. Kinsey's own notes show that infants were sexually stimulated until screaming, crying and in convulsions.

http://www.fathersforlife.org/kinsey1.htm

32 posted on 08/16/2004 4:37:12 PM PDT by Tamzee (Tell me honestly, Honey... do these classified documents make me look fat?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flashbunny

It's not as if the homosexual activists haven't done the same thing in the past to bring pressure to bear:

http://www.stopdrlaura.com/

What's next? A film championing the medical experiments of Dr. Josef/Joseph Mengele?


33 posted on 08/16/2004 8:19:51 PM PDT by weegee (YOU could have been aborted, and you wouldn't have had a CHOICE about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: TheBigB
It's a movie. A film. Images on celluloid. It's no more "evil" than a gun. Inanimate objects have no capacity for good or evil, only people do.

Then why did the Nazis spend so much effort producing films like Triumph of the Will and The Eternal Jew?

34 posted on 08/16/2004 8:22:52 PM PDT by weegee (YOU could have been aborted, and you wouldn't have had a CHOICE about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson