Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Cuban 'Fahrenheit' Telecast Raises Oscar Questions
Yahoo ^ | Aug 3, 2004 | Steve Gorman

Posted on 08/04/2004 3:10:45 PM PDT by swilhelm73

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: My2Cents

Absolutely - considering it is not actually a "documentary" in the first place . . .


. . . rules as for litle prople, and not the Hollywood gliterrati.


21 posted on 08/04/2004 4:33:40 PM PDT by BenLurkin ("A republic, if we can revive it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
Rule Twelve Special Rules for The Documentary Awards I. DEFINITION 1. An eligible documentary film is defined as a theatrically released non-fiction motion picture dealing creatively with cultural, artistic, historical, social, scientific, economic or other subjects. It may be photographed in actual occurrence, or may employ partial re-enactment, stock footage, stills, animation, stop-motion or other techniques, as long as the emphasis is on fact and not on fiction.

i would say it is a documentary, but you may argue it isnt a very good one because it is (say) innacurate.
22 posted on 08/04/2004 5:38:43 PM PDT by sweneop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
This is the first article I've seen to assert that the televising of this film was unauthorized. Seems they would have made a bigger stink about it before the "Oscar" question came up.

Why isn't the MPAA railing against this piracy, isn't that one of their big pet issues these days?

Didn't Michael Moore give tacit approval to those who bootlegged this film because he wanted it to be seen? It seems that the topic came up in one of his interviews.

23 posted on 08/04/2004 6:12:31 PM PDT by weegee (YOU could have been aborted, and you wouldn't have had a CHOICE about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa

Note that they say it is elligible for "Best Screenplay", wouldn't that disavow the "documentary" status? Has any other documentary been nominated for "Best Screenplay"?


24 posted on 08/04/2004 6:13:50 PM PDT by weegee (YOU could have been aborted, and you wouldn't have had a CHOICE about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe
I hope it wins best picture of the year. That will be the ultimate indictment of the entire industry.

If "Bowling For Columbine" was this industry's indictment, then "F-9/11" is it's conviction to a life sentence.

25 posted on 08/04/2004 6:17:39 PM PDT by GOP_Raider (Conservative, Republican, Raider Fan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
The Academy has also censored criticism of this film by other filmmakers:

Academy drafts new dirty tricks rules (No negative campaigning in Oscar race)

26 posted on 08/04/2004 6:20:01 PM PDT by weegee (YOU could have been aborted, and you wouldn't have had a CHOICE about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73

I fully expect PBS to air this film on TV the night before the election.


27 posted on 08/04/2004 7:36:02 PM PDT by aimhigh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: weegee

Well, it is fiction.


28 posted on 09/18/2004 1:15:40 PM PDT by Raven281
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: aimhigh

No doubt they will..I think they should place it in a new catagory Sh*t film of the year .Personally ,I'd hang him for treason


29 posted on 09/18/2004 1:20:18 PM PDT by omstrat (zip code77034)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: swilhelm73
Axis Mikey has already decided to forgo the "Best Documentary" nomination and to instead compete in the other categories this year.

Lord Fat Ass (heir apparent to Nazi Germany American broadcaster Lord Haw Haw) is still trying to swing an election eve broadcast in the United States for his film.

I've tried to raise the point several times that I certainly didn't hear any shouts from Michael Moore, his investors/distributors, or the MPAA over Cuba's violating of Michael Moore's film rights. I still suspect that it was an authorized showing.
30 posted on 09/18/2004 2:53:59 PM PDT by weegee (What's the provenance, Kenneth? Where did the forged SeeBS memo come from?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson