Skip to comments.
Mark Steyn: Blame the UN cheerleaders
The Australian ^
| July 26, 2004
| Mark Steyn
Posted on 07/25/2004 4:13:29 PM PDT by aculeus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
1
posted on
07/25/2004 4:13:30 PM PDT
by
aculeus
To: Pokey78
2
posted on
07/25/2004 4:20:15 PM PDT
by
aculeus
To: aculeus
At this juncture, there's not much left to say except "Farg the U.N!"
3
posted on
07/25/2004 4:27:58 PM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: aculeus; Forgiven_Sinner; Constitution Day; Pokey78; Eurotwit; free me; Tolik; Slings and Arrows; ..
4
posted on
07/25/2004 5:16:09 PM PDT
by
nothingnew
(KERRY: "If at first you don't deceive, lie, lie again!")
To: aculeus
Sudan was elected to a three-year term on the UN Human Rights Commission. This isn't an aberration: Zimbabwe is also a member.Time to get out
To: aculeus; Howlin; riley1992; Miss Marple; deport; Dane; sinkspur; steve; kattracks; JohnHuang2; ...
Thanks aculeus!
6
posted on
07/25/2004 5:55:42 PM PDT
by
Pokey78
To: aculeus
7
posted on
07/25/2004 6:18:36 PM PDT
by
xzins
(Retired Army and Supporting Bush/Cheney 2004!)
To: aculeus
This hits me as one of his best columns. Difficult judgment to make, I know. Thank God for Mark's work.
8
posted on
07/25/2004 7:36:38 PM PDT
by
Paul_B
To: Pokey78
9
posted on
07/25/2004 9:24:04 PM PDT
by
GOPJ
To: aculeus; knighthawk
Ping!
10
posted on
07/25/2004 9:37:42 PM PDT
by
Hat-Trick
(Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
To: aculeus
There's an old, cynical formula for the prominence accorded different disasters by American editors. It runs something like: one dead American equals 10 dead Israelis equals 100 dead Russians equals 1000 dead Africans. But, to the average progressive columnist in the Western world, what matters is who killed you. 30,000 dead Sudanese don't equal one Iraqi prisoner being led around Abu Ghraib on a dog collarReminds me of the NAACP.
To: Paul_B
This hits me as one of his best columns. Difficult judgment to make, I know. Thank God for Mark's work.It's difficult to discriminate among relative expressions of genius. What Mark does so well here is trash bogus intentions for their lack of results. You would have liked to have saved that small child from the fire - but somebody else was willing to go in and you stopped him. Your merit should be zero or negative and that is what Mark is telling me.
12
posted on
07/25/2004 9:46:06 PM PDT
by
jimfree
(Never did no wanderin' after all.)
To: aculeus
13
posted on
07/25/2004 10:12:49 PM PDT
by
Ruth A.
To: nothingnew
Thanks for the ping to a full Steyn of cheer.
14
posted on
07/25/2004 10:19:45 PM PDT
by
Defiant
(What's in a name? How would John Kohn fare in this election?)
To: headsonpikes
15
posted on
07/26/2004 2:24:15 AM PDT
by
metesky
("Brethren, leave us go amongst them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond- The Searchers)
To: aculeus
Zimbabwe and Sudan on the U.N. Human Rights Commission? Joining Libya to lecture us all?
Just add Castro and Kim Il Crazy-Nukes and the Muslims and you'll have a perfect mockery of any meaningful notion of human rights.
And we actually spend money on this thing?
16
posted on
07/26/2004 6:24:03 AM PDT
by
George W. Bush
(It's the Congress, stupid.)
To: aculeus
The genocide in the Sudan has already happened.
It , too, was on Clinton's watch.
Upwards of one million (some say two million) Black Christian/Animist Sudanese were killed during the 90s.
Once again, the world only pays attention if the dying is done by non-Christians. In this case, it is Muslims killing Muslims, only their color is different.
Where are the calls in the Muslim world to stop this atrocity ?
17
posted on
07/26/2004 6:29:14 AM PDT
by
happygrl
To: aculeus
American Heritage interviews Ralph Peters:
Youve argued that nineteenth-century concepts of international relations may be outmoded. In fact, arent you pretty skeptical about national sovereignty, international organizations, and international law? The idea of absolute state sovereignty is relatively new, and it derives from agreements among kings, emperors, kaisers, and czars for their mutual benefit. What were left with from the state making of seventeenth- and eighteenth-century Europe is a legacy that tells us we cannot intervene in states as they slaughter their own citizens because theyre sovereign. By that logic, Hitler would have been perfectly legitimate as long as he killed only German Jews. Its patently flawed logic. Any state that benefits only a dictatorship, oligarchy, or clique, that oppresses, brutalizes, and even massacres elements of its own citizenry, has no legitimate claim on sovereigntyperiod. Sovereignty is fine for contemporary Japan, the European states, or, for that matter, India. Mexico is now coming along and trying very hard. But states like Iraq, Milosevi«cs Yugoslavia, and a number of African thugocracies have no legitimate claim on sovereignty.
http://www.americanheritage.com/xml/2003/1/2003_1_feat_0.xml
18
posted on
07/26/2004 6:56:14 AM PDT
by
happygrl
To: happygrl
19
posted on
07/26/2004 7:00:56 AM PDT
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: aculeus
20
posted on
07/26/2004 8:10:00 AM PDT
by
Akira
(Dyin' ain't much of a livin')
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson