Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In a Sprawling Memoir, Clinton Cites Storms and Settles Scores (NYT Spin on Clinton's "My Lies")
New York Times ^ | 06/19/04 | JOHN M. BRODER

Posted on 06/18/2004 8:38:02 PM PDT by conservative in nyc

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last
To: Zevonismymuse
He said he spent the several days immediately after his confession alternately begging for forgiveness and plotting a retaliatory strike against Mr. bin Laden and Al Qaeda for the August 1998 bombings of United States embassies in Tanzania and Kenya. Aides warned him that such a strike might be seen as an effort to change the subject from his personal and legal woes.

Is he trying to claim it was the right wing cabal who allowed bin Laden to escape?

Yes. The man truly is a dick.
41 posted on 06/18/2004 11:16:29 PM PDT by CaptSkip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
With a better candidate, its possible Bubba might have been beaten. But no, Bob Dole had to insist it was his turn. To most Republicans, he was a representative of a time when the party's ideology could be summed up in getting along with the New Deal. And Clinton's appeal was he was gun shy and wouldn't rock the boat. The rest as they say, was history.

Yep. Man I hate it when people can clog up the nomination system by cashing in chits with party bigwigs just because it's "their time".

42 posted on 06/18/2004 11:50:29 PM PDT by jennyp (http://crevo.bestmessageboard.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

"Is it just me, or does everyone else find this "sleeping on the couch" business a bit much?"


LOL!! No kidding! I imagine the Clintons ALWAYS had separate bedrooms in the WH. I figured the "sleeping on the couch" stuff was just an expression of Slick's meaning Hil-Hil was mad at him.


43 posted on 06/19/2004 3:47:42 AM PDT by Maria S ("And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm."George W. Bush 1/20/01)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: AHerald; goldstategop

Just a little correction of my mistake for the record: The date of George W. Bush's acceptance speech was obviously not in August of 2004, but 2000.


44 posted on 06/19/2004 4:54:56 AM PDT by AHerald
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
He describes his youth as "a fat band boy" and recalls that in junior high school, as he began to learn more about his mind and body, some of it scared him, including his first sexual stirrings.

No class, no dignity.

45 posted on 06/19/2004 6:36:52 AM PDT by mountaineer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop
Perhaps Clinton should have titled his book Remembrance of Thongs Passed?
46 posted on 06/19/2004 7:59:22 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy

They didn't sleep in trhe same bedroom anyways. He has as much intimacy with Hillary as he does with Janet Reno. Right now he probably has 2 or 3 girlfriewnds and Hillary doesn't care. The normal implications for a marriage do not applyy here. Everything is a business desicion.


47 posted on 06/19/2004 9:55:09 AM PDT by NotchJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
He details his aversion to going to Vietnam, and writes that he searched his heart at the time, trying to determine whether it was "rooted in conviction or cowardice." He says he is not sure, given how events played out, that he ever answered the question for himself.

Incredible! How would this confession of his make you feel if it was one of your loved ones who was dragged through the streets of Mogadishu in '93?

It is still bloody amazing to me that this punk was America's Commander-in-Chief for eight years.

48 posted on 06/19/2004 10:07:49 AM PDT by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper; CaptainK
Dan Rather compared Clinton's memoirs to U.S. Grant? What do you think Grant would have thought of this? See post #48
49 posted on 06/19/2004 10:13:14 AM PDT by O.C. - Old Cracker (When the cracker gets old, you wind up with Old Cracker. - O.C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: O.C. - Old Cracker

I had JUST read that very portion aloud to my husband and pointed out how telling it was about this person named Bill Clinton.

And again, the New York Times and Dan Rather find nothing to criticize about this.

Outrageous.


50 posted on 06/19/2004 10:16:26 AM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

nyt vs billxxxlinton: who to believe?


51 posted on 06/19/2004 1:06:35 PM PDT by InvisibleChurch (I actually did vote for the $87 billion before I voted against it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
Mr. Clinton writes that his father's death at age 28, before he was born,

William Jefferson Blythe died at 28 - three months before WJB Clinton was born - and three months after returning to the US from Italy. Clinton's own mother did not deny this, and Clinton weighed ten pounds at birth.

No one on this forum, and perhaps Bill Clinton himself, had any idea who his biological father is; his mother took that secret to her grave.

52 posted on 06/19/2004 1:39:06 PM PDT by Castlebar (former Florida military absentee voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc
which ruled unanimously in 1997 that Paula Jones's sexual harassment case against him could go forward while he was in office. He called that one of the most politically naïve and damaging court decisions in years.

Paula Jones claimed that Mr.Clinton's private parts had a distinguishing feature which she would not reveal.

It has now been revealed: Dan Rather's lips wrapped tightly around Clinton's genitals.

53 posted on 06/19/2004 1:45:11 PM PDT by Castlebar (former Florida military absentee voter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: conservative in nyc

Read this book review. It's scathing! Im flabbergasted

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/06/20/books/20CLIN.html?ei=5006&en=b1de08dbc243a997&ex=1088308800&partner=ALTAVISTA1&pagewanted=print&position=

June 20, 2004
BOOKS OF THE TIMES
The Pastiche of a Presidency, Imitating a Life, in 957 Pages
By MICHIKO KAKUTANI

As his celebrated 1993 speech in Memphis to the Church of God in Christ demonstrated, former President Bill Clinton is capable of soaring eloquence and visionary thinking. But as those who heard his deadening speech nominating Michael Dukakis at the 1988 Democratic National Convention in Atlanta well know, he is also capable of numbing, self-conscious garrulity.

Unfortunately for the reader, Mr. Clinton's much awaited new autobiography "My Life" more closely resembles the Atlanta speech, which was so long-winded and tedious that the crowd cheered when he finally reached the words "In closing . . ."

The book, which weighs in at more than 950 pages, is sloppy, self-indulgent and often eye-crossingly dull — the sound of one man prattling away, not for the reader, but for himself and some distant recording angel of history.

In many ways, the book is a mirror of Mr. Clinton's presidency: lack of discipline leading to squandered opportunities; high expectations, undermined by self-indulgence and scattered concentration. This memoir underscores many strengths of Mr. Clinton's eight years in the White House and his understanding that he was governing during a transitional and highly polarized period. But the very lack of focus and order that mars these pages also prevented him from summoning his energies in a sustained manner to bring his insights about the growing terror threat and an Israeli-Palestinian settlement to fruition.

Certainly it's easy enough to understand the huge advance sales for the book. Mr. Clinton would seem to have all the gifts for writing a gripping memoir: gifts of language, erudition and charm, combined with a policy wonk's perception of a complex world at a hinge moment in time, teetering on the pivot between Cold War assumptions and a new era of global interdependence. Add to that his improbable life story — a harrowing roller-coaster ride of precocious achievements, self-inflicted slip-ups and even more startling comebacks — and you have all the ingredients for a compelling book.

But while Dan Rather, who interviewed Mr. Clinton for "60 Minutes," has already compared the book to the memoirs of Ulysses S. Grant, arguably the most richly satisfying autobiography by an American president, "My Life" has little of that classic's unsparing candor or historical perspective. Instead, it devolves into a hodgepodge of jottings: part policy primer, part 12-step confessional, part stump speech and part presidential archive, all, it seems, hurriedly written and even more hurriedly edited.

In fact, "My Life" reads like a messy pastiche of everything that Mr. Clinton ever remembered and wanted to set down in print; he even describes the time he got up at 4 a.m. to watch the inaugural ceremonies for Nigeria's new president on TV. There are endless litanies of meals eaten, speeches delivered, voters greeted and turkeys pardoned. There are some fascinating sections about Mr. Clinton's efforts to negotiate a Middle East peace agreement (at one point, he suggests that Yasir Arafat seemed confused, not fully in command of the facts and possibly no longer at the top of his game), but there are also tedious descriptions of long-ago political debates in Arkansas over utility regulation and car license fees . There are some revealing complaints about missteps at the FBI under Louis Freeh's watch , but there are also dozens of pointless digressions about matters like zombies in Haiti and ruins in Pompeii.

Mr. Clinton confesses that his affair with Monica Lewinsky was "immoral and foolish," but he spends far more space excoriating his nemesis, independent counsel Kenneth W. Starr, and the press. He writes at length about his awareness that terrorism was a growing threat, but does not grapple with the unintended consequences of his administration's decisions to pressure Sudan to expel Osama bin Laden in 1996 (driving sent the al Qaeda leader to Afghanistan, where he was harder to track) or to launch cruise missile attacks against targets in Sudan and Afghanistan in retaliation for the embassy bombings in 1998 (an act that some terrorism experts believe fueled terrorists' conviction that the United States was an ineffectual giant that relied on low-risk high technology).

Part of the problem, of course, is that Mr. Clinton is concerned, here, with cementing — or establishing — his legacy, while at the same time boosting (or at least not undermining) the political career of his wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton. He does a persuasive job of explicating his more successful initiatives like welfare reform and deficit reduction, but the failure of his health care initiative, overseen by Mrs. Clinton, is quickly glossed over, as is the subsequent focus of his administration on such small-bore initiatives as school uniforms and teenage smoking.

Mr. Clinton takes more responsibility in these pages for his affair with Ms. Lewinsky, his lies about that affair and the damage those actions inflicted on his family and his presidency than he has in the past. But he still spends a lot of time — like his wife did in her book — assailing right-wing enemies for his woes over Whitewater, the Paula Jones case and impeachment. In the end, he says, what brought him and his wife back together was weekly counseling sessions and their shared determination "to fight off the right-wing coup." He sheds little new light on his relationship with Mrs. Clinton, simply noting that he always admired her mix of idealism and practicality, and that she initially hesitated over his marriage proposal, knowing that "being married to me would be a high-wire operation in more ways than one." In another passage, Mr. Clinton tries to characterize his impeachment fight as "my last great showdown with the forces I had opposed all of my life" - with those who had defended segregation in the South, opposed the women's and gay rights movements, and who believed government should be run for the benefit of special interests. He adds that he was glad that he had had "the good fortune to stand against this latest incarnation of the forces of reaction and division."

In comparison to these self-serving, often turgid attempts to defend his reputation, Mr. Clinton's account of his youth in Arkansas possesses a pleasing emotional directness. His portraits of life in the raffish Hot Springs and the more sedate Hope (towns that would became the polestars of his Janus-faced personality, what political guru Dick Morris once called "Saturday Night Bill" and "Sunday Morning Clinton") may lack the raw energy of his mother Virginia Kelley's reminiscences, set down in her 1994 book "Leading With My Heart," but he does provide the reader with some telling snapshots of his awkward childhood: a fat, self-conscious boy dressed in a new Easter outfit every year — including, one year, pink and black Hush Puppies and a matching pink suede belt; breaking his leg trying to jump rope wearing cowboy boots; devouring books about Geronimo and Crazy Horse at the local library.

Looking back on those days of living with a violent, abusive stepfather, Mr. Clinton writes like someone familiar with therapeutic tropes. He writes that seeing his stepfather angry and drunk, he came to associate anger with being out of control, and determined to keep his own anger locked away. He writes about experiencing a "major spiritual crisis" at the age of 13, when he found it difficult to sustain a belief in God in the face of his family's difficulties. And he writes about the coping mechanisms he developed — including learning to live "parallel lives" where he walled off his anger and grief to get on with his daily life.

Many events recounted in this book have been chronicled before —- not just by the dozens of reporters and biographers who have swarmed over Mr. Clinton's life, but by people close to the former president, including his wife, his mother, his brother Roger, Ms. Lewinsky, and former members of his administration like George Stephanopoulos and Robert Reich. For the most part, the self-portrait that emerges from this book is not all that different a Bill Clinton from the one the public has already come to know: tireless, driven, boyish, self-absorbed and optimistic, someone riven by contradictions but adept at compartmentalizing different parts of his life.

Mr. Clinton once remarked that he saw character as "a journey, not a destination," and at the end of this book, he cites "becoming a good person" as one of his life goals. Still, the seeds of his adult self can be glimpsed in an autobiographical essay he wrote in high school: "I am a living paradox — deeply religious, yet not as convinced of my exact beliefs as I ought to be; wanting responsibility yet shirking it; loving the truth but often times giving way to falsity." It is only because Mr. Clinton was president of the United States that these excavations of self — a staple of celebrity and noncelebrity memoirs these days — are considered newsworthy.

The nation's first baby-boomer president always seemed like an avatar of his generation, defined by the struggles of the 60's and Vietnam, comfortable in the use of touchy-feely language, and intent on demystifying his job. And yet the former president's account of his life, read in this post-9/11 day, feels strangely like an artifact from a distant, more innocent era.

Lies about sex and real estate, partisan rancor over "character issues" (not over weapons of mass destruction or pre-emptive war), psychobabble mea culpas, and tabloid wrangles over stained dresses all seem like pressing matters from another galaxy, far, far away.


54 posted on 06/19/2004 3:08:17 PM PDT by finnman69 (hOcum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestus globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Castlebar
Well, I've been taking a trip down memory lane and reading all about it, and this just struck me. I never noticed the dates before:

High Crimes? Or Just a Sex Cover-Up?

Excerpt:

On Dec. 18 and 23, Lewinsky interviewed at two New York firms contacted by Jordan. On Dec. 19, she was served with a subpoena to testify in the Jones case. On Dec. 22, Jordan took Lewinsky to her new attorney, and the two discussed her job prospects, the subpoena and the Jones case during the ride in his limousine.

What caught my eye reading that date this time was one year, to the day, later, Bill Clinton was impeached by the House of Representatives.

55 posted on 06/19/2004 3:09:46 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
Wow, that is some book review. Compare that to this, also from the NY Times:

In a Sprawling Memoir, Clinton Cites Storms and Settles Scores (NYT Spin on Clinton's "My Lies")

56 posted on 06/19/2004 3:17:53 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: finnman69
but there are also dozens of pointless digressions about matters like zombies in Haiti and ruins in Pompeii.

This is interesting. He took part in a Santeria ritual in Haiti at a crucial time---I haven't gone to look it up, but it might have been re-election---and I always thought of it as his sacrifice to the devil. A weird thought, perhaps, but I'm not the one who was in Haiti doing voodoo.

57 posted on 06/19/2004 3:38:56 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper
It is only because Mr. Clinton was president of the United States that these excavations of self — a staple of celebrity and noncelebrity memoirs these days — are considered newsworthy.

...!

58 posted on 06/19/2004 3:45:43 PM PDT by EllaMinnow ("President Reagan has left us, but he has left us stronger and better." President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: redlipstick
The book, which weighs in at more than 950 pages, is sloppy, self-indulgent and often eye-crossingly dull — the sound of one man prattling away, not for the reader, but for himself and some distant recording angel of history.

The recording angel of history will note the evidence supporting a certain psychological diagnosis and, voila, a legacy is written.

59 posted on 06/19/2004 3:53:20 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

That poor angel...having to record Clinton's slop and nonsense.


60 posted on 06/19/2004 3:55:25 PM PDT by EllaMinnow ("President Reagan has left us, but he has left us stronger and better." President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-62 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson