|
UNFIT:
 (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) thanx to jla for research johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com |
Posted on 05/21/2004 10:55:25 AM PDT by Mia T
UNFIT:
taking the measure of a would-be commander-in-chief
WHY JOHN KERRY IS DANGEROUS FOR AMERICA
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)
thanx to jla for research
johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com
LOL
Wow good job!
thx for your help ping
kerry unfit ping
Another great one.
fyi
I reckon I'd also better ping those who don't intend on voting for Dubya Nov 2nd.
Might as well...we might prove useful in the long run...MUD
LOL Thanks for the ping. Funny stuff!
.
Remember the Lost and Suffering on September 11, 2001
http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=33
.
BTTT Very Good Mia- as always!
Unfit ??? .....[barf alert!]
#14 .... I didn't see your ping til just now.
Yep. Two posts. Almost exactly the same. What is he talking about?
He/she knows also that Dubya was in the Skull 'n Bones.
Liberal troll I'd say, trying to affect a clever guise.
.
NEVER FORGET
...Today RUSH LIMBAUGH stated that KERRY wants what Europe wants us to do in Iraq and that's to leave there =
...More Terrorist Attacks against US here at home after we leave.
The 21st Century JOHN KERRY =
The 1970's JOHN KERRY
4-Sure.
JOHN KERRY = Enemy of Vietnam Vets
http://www.TheAlamoFILM.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1320
NEVER FORGET
fyi
Subject: This is powerful...watch it to the very end Click on the sight below http://members.cox.net/classicweb/Heroes/heroes.htm
|
 (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com |
.
Los Angeles local KABC-TV Channel 7 News is now reporting that JOHN KERRY will NOT accept his Democrat Party's Presidential Nomination in June but will instead wait till BUSH accepts his Nomination in August before doing so.
This so that KERRY can start the final 2004 Presidential Campaign from the same level playing field as BUSH in Federal Campaign Funds.
CLINTONIAN-KERRY-HO CHI MINH type TRICKS-TRICKS-TRICKS..!!!
The Enemy is now Within...
and always has been...
only now it's in Time of War...
with our OWN Freedom at stake.
.
Would Tom Ridge, Vietnam veteran and patriot, continue on at Homeland Security if Kerry were elected? Or would Democrats dismantle the last three years of work done on behalf of all Americans in that dedicated organization?
Most Homeland Security personnel are probably very pro-Bush. How long would their jobs last under a vengeful Kerry term? Hasn't Kerry made it plain that Bush and his policies are some of the worst he could imagine? That means he will aim to undo much more than we can even imagine.
What else would get worse? Islamists want to kill us no matter what we do. Kerry would weaken the offense and dismantle the defense. He's admitted as much.
So would any other Democrat except Zell Miller. America can't afford another Democrat in the Presidency.
|
bill clinton
|
|
|
|
If Act I was a thinly veiled allegory about naked clintonism, then Act II is a parable about the plan for world domination by the Establishment, aged hippies in pinstripes all, with their infantile, solipsistic world view amazingly untouched by time. Mia T, June 9, 1999 |
The Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent2
|
|
||||||
|
by Mia T, 4.6.03 Mia T, June 9, 1999 Helloooo? That the Democrats have to be spoon-fed what should be axiomatic post-9/11 is, in and of itself, incontrovertible proof that From's advice is insufficient to solve their problem. From's failure to fully lay out the nature of the Democrats' problem is not surprising: he is the guy who helped seal his party's fate. It was his Democratic Leadership Council (DLC) that institutionalized the proximate cause of the problem, clintonism, and legitimized its two eponymic provincial operators on the national stage. The "Third Way" and "triangulation" don't come from the same Latin root for no reason. That "convince" is From's operative word underscores the Democrats' dilemma. Nine-eleven was transformative. It is no longer sufficient merely to convince. One must demonstrate, demonstrate convincingly, if you will… which means both in real time and historically. When it comes to national security, Americans will no longer take any chances. Turning the turn of phrase back on itself, the era of the Placebo President is over. (Incidentally, the oft-quote out-of-context sentence fragment alluded to here transformed meaningless clinton triangulation into a meaningful if deceptive soundbite.) Although From is loath to admit it -- the terror in his eyes belies his facile solution -- the Democratic party's problem transcends its anti-war contingent. With a philosophy that relinquishes our national sovereignty -- and relinquishes it reflexively… and to the UN no less -- the Democratic party is, by definition, the party of national insecurity. With policy ruled by pathologic self-interest -- witness the "Lieberman Paradigm," Kerry's "regime change" bon mot (gone bad), Edwards' and the clintons' brazen echoes thereof (or, alternatively, Pelosi's less strident wartime non-putdown putdown)… and, of course, the clincher -- eight years of the clintons' infantilism, grotesquerie and utter failure -- the Democratic party is, historically and in real time, the party of national insecurity. The Democrats used to be able to wallpaper their national insecurity with dollars and demogoguery. But that was before 9/11.
Note in particular Madeleine Albright's shocking reason given at the time of the USS Cole attack why the clinton administration should not respond militarily. It tell us everything we need to know about the clintons. It tell us why clinton redux is an absolutely suicidal notion. Notwithstanding their cowardice, corruption, perfidy, and to borrow a phrase from Andrew Cuomo, their essential cluelessness, the clintons, according to Albright, made their decision not to go after the terrorists primarily for reasons of their own legacy and power. The clintons reasoned that inaction would MAXIMIZE THEIR CHANCES TO RECEIVE THE NOBEL PEACE PRIZE. No matter that that inaction would also maximize the terrorists' power, maximize America's danger. For more than a half decade, the Clinton administration was shoveling atomic secrets out the door as fast as it could, literally by the ton. Millions of previously classified ideas and documents relating to nuclear arms were released to all comers, including China's bomb makers. William J. Broad
But it is Broad's failure to fully connect the dots -- clinton's wholesale release of atomic secrets, decades of Chinese money sluicing into clinton's campaigns, clinton's pushing of the test ban treaty, clinton's concomitant sale of supercomputers, and clinton's noxious legacy -- that blows his argument to smithereens and reduces his piece to just another clinton apologia by The New York Times. But even a Times apologia cannot save clinton from the gallows. Clinton can be both an absolute (albeit postmodern) moron and a traitor. The strict liability Gump-ism, "Treason is as treason does" applies. The idea that an individual can be convicted of the crime of treason only if there is treasonous intent or *mens rea* runs contrary to the concept of strict liability crimes. That doctrine (Park v United States, (1974) 421 US 658,668) established the principle of 'strict liability' or 'liability without fault' in certain criminal cases, usually involving crimes which endanger the public welfare. Calling his position on the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty "an historic milestone," (if he must say so himself) clinton believed that if he could get China to sign it, he would go down in history as the savior of mankind. This was 11 August 1995. (There would be an analogous treasonous miscalculation in the Mideast: clinton failed to shut down Muslim terrorism, then in its incipient stage and stoppable, because he reasoned that doing so would have wrecked his chances for the Nobel Peace Prize. Indeed, according to Richard Miniter, Madeleine Albright offered precisely the Nobel-Muslim factor as a primary reason for not treating the bombing of the USS Cole as an act of war.) It is precisely the clintons' bin-Laden-emboldening inaction to the attack on the USS Cole and the clintons' bin-Laden-emboldening token, ineffectual, August 1998 missile strikes of aspirin factories and empty tents that eliminate "bin-Laden-emboldenment avoidance" as the rationale for the latter decision and support "wag the dog," instead. Taken together, feckless clinton inaction and feckless clinton action serve only to reinforce the almost universally held notion: the clinton calculus was, is, and always will be, solely self-serving. In the case of the non-response to the attack on the Cole, an unambiguous act of war, the clinton rationale, according to no less than Madeleine Albright, was a clinton Nobel Peace Prize by Arab appeasement. i.e., a clinton Nobel Peace Prize by bin-Laden-emboldenment. And in the case of the curiously-timed, ineffectual (and, therefore, bin-Laden-emboldening) token missile strikes, the clinton rationale was Lewinsky-recantation distraction -- clearly not bin-Laden-emboldenment avoidance. (This is not to say there wasn't a Nobel factor here, too. Obsolete intelligence, bolstered by the redundancy of a clinton tipoff, ensured that both bin Laden and the Mideast Muslim ego would escape unscathed.) Mia T, "WAG THE DOG" revisited WASHINGTON -- Two Norwegian public-relations executives and one member of the Norwegian Parliament say they were contacted by the White House to help campaign for President Clinton to receive this year's Nobel Peace Prize for his work in trying to negotiate peace in the Middle East. Clinton Lobbies for Nobel Prize: What a Punk AIDES PUSH CLINTON FOR THE NOBEL Mia T, Buddy Death Report Raises More Questions Than It Answers
|
|
"G-word"shame presages "W-word" horror  (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE) |
|
bill clinton bill clinton Note: clinton's use of the collective "we" when assigning blame for his utter failure, (as opposed to the clinton "I" when arrogating the success of others), is consistent with his "buck stops there/everywhere but not here" policy.
|
|
"Free Republic is one of those groups obsessed with the Clinton era." Word's out: Protest at Hillary's tonight
|
The Mary Jo White Memo:
Documentation of clintons' and Gorelick's willful, seditious malfeasance
A rapist is not a fit president:
Post-9/11 Reconsideration of The Placebo Presidentbump
Not to worry. hyperion777 is currently:Nobody by that name.
Very good, T
.
We all have to understand that ...JOHN KERRY has always been on the side of our Terrorist Enemies, ever since his Anti-U.S. days during the Vietnam War, and nothing has changed since.
KERRY =
OSAMA =
SADDAM =
HO CHI MINH
against US
.
Thanks, dude, for the ping!
bump
 (viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE) johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com
|
bump
bump
bump
bump
bump
^
BTTT
bump
|
||
|
Monday, May 31, 2004 10:53 p.m. EDT Former Congressman John Leboutillier reports on a Memorial Day confrontation between Sen. John Kerry and a fellow Vietnam veteran: Democratic senator - and certain presidential nominee - John F. Kerry gave the middle finger to a Vietnam veteran at the Vietnam Memorial Wall on Memorial Day morning, NewsMax.com has learned. Ted Sampley, a former Green Beret who served two full tours in Vietnam, spotted Kerry and his Secret Service detail at about 9:00 a.m. Monday morning at the Wall. Sampley walked up to Kerry, extended his hand and said, "Senator, I am Ted Sampley, the head of Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry, and I am here to escort you away from the Wall because you do not belong here." At that point a Secret Service officer told Sampley to back away from Kerry. Sampley moved about 6 feet away and opened his jacket to reveal a HANOI JOHN T-shirt. Kerry then began talking to a group of schoolchildren. Sampley then showed the T-shirt to the children and said, "Kerry does not belong at the Wall because he betrayed the brave soldiers who fought in Vietnam." Just then Kerry - in front of the school children, other visitors and Secret Service agents - brazenly 'flashed the bird' at Sampley and then yelled out to everyone, "Sampley is a felon!" Kerry was referring to an incident 12 years ago when Sampley confronted Sen. John McCain's chief aide, Mark Salter, in a Senate stairwell after McCain repeatedly offended POW families at a Senate POW hearing. Sampley, whose father-in-law at that time was MIA in Laos, followed Salter into the stairwell and, when they emerged, Salter had a bloody lip and a broken nose. Sampley's group, Vietnam Veterans Against John Kerry, has garnered huge national attention and has been featured in the New York Times, the Washington Post and on MSNBC's "Scarborough Country." Tens of thousands of Vietnam vets have registered their opposition to Kerry through Sampley's group. Clearly Sampley has gotten under Kerry's skin once again.
Editor's note: Breaking: The Real Story About John Kerry`s Vietnam Record -- Click Here!
|
ELECTION BOTTOM LINE:
TERRORIST SYMPATHIZER or TERRORIST ANNIHILATOR
|
Bush said it best. "You are either with us, or you are with the terrorists." The Left clearly made its choice. Kerry's reckless Tet-Offensive gambit is a conspiracy of what Lenin called "useful idiots." It is a Leftist band of blind apologists for the islamofascist-terrorist enemies of America. But I suspect even Lenin would be surprised by the pro-islamofascist-terrorist radical chic-ness of it all. These useful idiots, a self-anointed "intelligentsia"--now there's an oxymoron for you-- are the familiar motley collection of constituencies from the media, academe, Hollywood and, of course, the trusty left wing of our own federal government.
As you must have noticed by now, "incompetent" is their buzzword; it is uttered with dripping contempt and is separated by no more than one word from "George Bush," which is spit, not spoken. The Kennedy-Pelosi-Gore-clinton (either--"one for the price of two," I say)-Sulzberger-Soros-Moore construct is its grotesque manifestation. Some would call it a clever contrivance, engineered to render, by contrast, its virtually mute beneficiary, John Kerry, marginally sane, and if not attractive, certainly acceptably plain.
COPYRIGHT MIA T 2004 |
by Mia T, 6.11.03
The second law of thermodynamics states that the quality of energy in a closed system is degraded irreversibly. Physical, chemical, and electrical energy transform into thermal energy --heat. Reversing the process, e.g., heat into physical energy, cannot fully occur within the system without an inevitable loss of energy in the form of irretrievable heat. Energy is not destroyed; it is merely unavailable for producing work. (The irreversible increase of this nondisposable energy in the universe is measured by the abstract dimension called entropy.) clinton corruption is all about the irreversible degradation of the energy in our closed system. A leftist band of heat-producing useful idiots are currently assisting in the clintons' $8-million--make that $20 million--revisionist assault.  And if ever there was a heat-producing USEFUL IDIOT, it is Harvard's Elizabeth Sherman, who contends, apparently, that the clintons' rape of Broaddrick is somehow mitigated over time.. Contrast Sherman with clinton Administration Veteran/ Berkeley Professor, J. Bradford DeLong, who observed missus clinton up close:
There is a lot of talk these days, most notably by voluble nervous-Nellie Democratic operatives like Susan Estrich, about the clintons sucking up the oxygen, but no one is paying attention to the irreversible transformation of light into heat by the clintons. Once we understand that the latter process is irreversible, we will begin to do what we must.
|
|
bttt
Bump!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
neocommunist political movement, a tipsy-topsy, infantile perversion of the Marxist-Leninist model, global in scope, beginning in the post-cold-war, unipolar 1990s, led by the '60s neoliberal baby-boomer "intelligentsia," that seeks power without responsibility, i.e., that seeks to dilute American power by concentrating power in said '60s neoliberals while yielding America's sovereignty to the United Nations, i.e., while 
uspend disbelief for a minute. Pretend Kerry's dumb attempt at demagoguery is a serious pronouncement of policy. 
he endless plume of leeward (leftward, miasmic, 