CYCLE OF VIOLENCE

FoxNews (Special Report-Brit Hume) | 5.13.04 | Mia T

[Mia T]

I've often wondered what she brings to the panel....

[BadAndy]

Cycle of violence is the media's way of saying we should stop killing IslamoLunatics so they will stop killing us. It also portrays the violence as morally equal, as if bombing a busload of kids is equivalent to killing the guy who arranged the bombing.

[Helms]

"I've often wondered what she brings to the panel...."

I suspect the Talking Points we witnessed as well a fear of loosing her cocktail party privileges.

Any more these little minded people are recruited in high school classes, picked out by Ivy League Institutions as having potential for adroit test taking, brainwashed and lastly sent out by her liberal masters to spew their soft yet seditious creed.

[Mia T]

addition:

By virtually ignoring the Nick Berg decapitation and continuing to push the Iraqi-prisoner "abuse," by attempting to draw a moral equivalency between the subhuman and the infantile, the left exposes its seditious, power-hungry hand... and its fundamental heartlessness.

You can almost hear the whining. "We were on a roll with the Iraqi-prisoner "abuse." Why the [expletive] did al Qaeda have to one-up the Iraqi thing and kill our momentum?"

[Helms]

"Cycle of violence" - a term, heretofore, used prolifically when mainstream media refers to the "plight of the Palestinians."

And in turn to use the same word and media template so as to tie Gulliver's (US's) hands and feet in Iraq and render us in a perpetual war and perpetual preparedness for the day that will eclipse 9/11.

[jla]

addition:

By virtually ignoring the Nick Berg decapitation and continuing to push the Iraqi-prisoner "abuse," by attempting to draw a moral equivalency between the subhuman and the infantile, the left exposes its seditious, power-hungry hand... and its fundamental heartlessness.

You can almost hear the whining. "We were on a roll with the Iraqi-prisoner "abuse." Why the [expletive] did al Qaeda have to one-up the Iraqi thing and kill our momentum?"

[Mudboy Slim]

"FReep Dem Lib'rals!!"
(To be sung to Crosby, Stills, Nash and Young's "Teach Your Children")

You...must protect yer home...
Must fight the folks who want you to die.
Let's roll...apply yerselves...
Because the RATS promote the Big Lie!!
FReep Dem Lib'rals well...
Big Guv'ment's hell...must slowly decline.
Right feeds...good folks with dreams,
This World we'll fix...taxes are too high!!
Don't you ever quit the fight...'cuz if we do, Truth will die!!
Folks, just stand fer what is Right...and know God loves you.

Yes, you, gotta end Left's fears...
We'll whup RATS' rears...'til the Effete resign!!
We know Socialists...they are fools...
We seek the Truth, not DemonRAT lies.
FReep Dem Lib'rals well...their Sosh'list Hell, we'll slowly decline!!
Let's teach Dems 'bout our dreams...
Nation, we'll fix...Slick's TREASONOUS LIES!!
We won't ever quit the Fight...Reagan told you, "We Are Right!!"
RE-IMPEACH Slick fer his crimes...'cuz Jesus loves you!!

Mudboy Slim

[unlucky320]

How can anyone attempt to say that the beheading of Nick Berg was repay for the abuse of the Iraqi prisoners. Guess what at the end of all this the prisoners get to home, probably alive...but Berg gets to go home in a maybe a flag draped coffin.

My thoughts on this is that I blame America, and this is why. This is War, we need to start treating it as such, not have a gun in one hand and a loaf of bread in the other. You can't be friend and foe at the same time. America needs to stand up for America. You can't do that by refusing to see what is there in front of you. Nick Berg died a death that most people in America only see in a movie, they don't want to know about it. The government deals in numbers, how many troops are there, how much land is in our control, that kind of thing. We need to be outraged by what a fellow American suffered, not because he's white or black or whatever-American, but because he was an AMERICAN. A person who went over there to Iraq to help it's people and was killed in the process. Those responsible need to be found and dealt with. They believe in an eye for and eye, maybe it's time we did too!

[firewalk]

Hello Mia
thanks for the ping
& bttt

[Mia T]

 This is War, we need to start treating it as such --unlucky320

 

"The Sudanese wanted America to start dealing with them again. They released him [bin Laden].

At the time, '96, he had committed no crime against America, so I did not bring him here because we had no basis on which to hold him, though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America.

So I pleaded with the Saudis to take him, 'cause they could have; but they thought it was a hot potato. They didn't and that's how he wound up in Afghanistan."

bill clinton
Sunday, Aug. 11, 2002
Clinton Reveals on Secret Audio:
I Nixed Bin Laden Extradition Offer

ritical to the understanding of the clintons' (and Kerry's and the left's) inability to protect America from terrorism is the analysis of clinton's final phrase, "though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

"I did not bring him [Osama bin Laden] here... though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

This phrase is clinton's explicit rejection of both bin Laden's repeated declarations/acts of war and the (Bush) doctrine of preemption to fight terror.

This phrase underscores clinton's failure to understand that:

• a terrorist war requires only one consenting player

• defining bin Laden's acts of war as "crimes'' is a dangerous, anachronistic, postmodern conceit (It doesn't depend on what the meaning of the word "war" is) and amounts to surrender

  
  Kerry's Fatal(clinton)Error
  
  (viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
  
• preemption serves a necessary, critically protective, as well as offensive function in any war on terror.

 

The sorry endpoint of this massive, 8-year clinton blunder was, of course, 9/11 and the exponential growth of al Qaeda.

ASIDE: It is beyond farce, therefore, for Richard Clarke to exalt clinton, (whose response to terrorism--in those rare ("bimbo") instances when he did, in fact, respond--was feckless, at best), even as he attempts to take down Bush, a great president whose demonstrated vision, courage and tenacity in the face of seditious undermining by the power-hungry clintons and their leftist goons is nothing short of heroic.

 

Mia T, 3.28.04
CLINTON TURNED DOWN SUDAN'S OFFERS OF BIN LADEN
HEAR CLINTON'S SECRETLY TAPED "ADMISSION" NOW
clinton: "I did not bring him [Osama bin Laden] here... though
we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."

complete article
clinton: "I did not bring him [Osama bin Laden] here...
though we knew he wanted to commit crimes against America."
by Mia T, 4.01.04

[Mia T]

bump.

For all its 'nuanced' posturing, the left cannot seem to make the grossest of distinctions. This is attributable to character as well as cognitive defects.

The left is manifestly unfit to assume positions of leadership, especially now, post 9/11. I predict the electorate will see this and will send the lot of them packing.

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

Kerry: When You Want Your War Crimes Done Right!

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

John F. Kerry: Throw Your Cake And Have It Too!

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

Cash & Kerry For First Couple!

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

I Knew JFK. You're No JFK, But I Am!

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

John Kerry: A Pro-U.N.American

[UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide]

KerryFrance & Germany, the
Best Coalition Money Can Buy

[Mia T]

With the hyperlinks:

The Cycle of Violence:
NOW WITH HYPERLINKED INSTRUCTION MANUAL

by Mia T, 5.14.04

by Mia T, 5.13.04

 

hen ceci connolley referred the other night (Special Report-Brit Hume, FoxNews) to the decapitation of Nick Berg by the islamofascist animals as "part of the cycle of violence," my hair stood up on end.

It was clear to me that Connolley, a leftist, was attempting to subtlely equate that unspeakable subhuman horror with the Dems' BushBash du jour, the so-called Iraqi-prisoner abuse.

(Explicitly equating the two would never sell, and besides, doing so wouldn't exactly be an image-enhancing move for Ms. Connolley, whose punditry never seems to breach the safely tautological.)

When I began to hear other lefties use the same term in precisely the same context, it became clear that "cycle of violence" was the Kerry-DNC response to the al-Qaeda slaughter.

By virtually ignoring the Nick Berg decapitation and instead continuing to foment the Iraqi-prisoner-"abuse" scandal, by attempting to draw a "cycle of violence" moral equivalency between the subhuman terrorists and a few infantile Americans, the left exposes its seditious, America-hating, power-hungry hand, its fundamental unfitness to serve... and a despicable brand of clinto-Kerryesque opportunism rooted in 60s-liberal cluelessness.

I can almost hear the whining. "We were on a roll with the Iraqi-prisoner "abuse." Why the [expletive] did al Qaeda have to one-up the Iraqi thing and kill our momentum?"

Kerry's Belated Condemnation Focuses on Process

Kerry Lacks Moral Authority to Condemn Content

NEW virtual john kerry can bore + snowboard at the same time series

by Mia T, 5.07.04

 "CRY BUSH" + Iraqi-Prisoner "Abuse"
What are the Dems up to?

by Mia T, 5.06.04

 

(viewing movie requires Flash Player 7, available HERE)

johnkerryisdangerousforamerica.blogspot.com
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com

ohn Kerry, self-professed war criminal, needed the Iraqi prisoner "abuse" scandal about as much as bill clinton, documented rapist, needed the Saddam rape rooms or the marauding Milosevic rapist-guerrillas.

For this reason, Kerry did not respond for a full week to this latest leftist-fulminated Bush-bashing brouhaha, and when Kerry did finally respond, the focus of his condemnation was process, not content, his pulled punches notwithstanding.

Makes sense. War criminals, by definition, lack the requisite moral authority to address such war-related -- ah -- issues.

By contrast, the response from Kerry's leftist colleagues has been so disproportionate -- and so predictable -- that it approaches farce of farce, even if we discount demonstrated Democrat willingness to trade American blood and national security for reacquired power.

The Democrats, apparently not adherents of Aesop, have "cried Bush" far too many times to be to be anything but preposterous. (Thank you, Howard Dean.)

Are the reflexively self-serving, America-hating, power-hungry Dems simply clueless actors? Or are they part of a larger orchestrated effort to muddy up Kerry's Vietnam-atrocities swamp?

[Mia T]

bump

[malia]

bump