Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scarborough: Hillary 'Strong-armed' MSNBC to Kill Story
MSNBC's Scarborough Country ^ | April 29, 2004 | Joe Scarborough

Posted on 04/29/2004 8:36:24 PM PDT by Carl/NewsMax

MSNBC TRANSCRIPT

Scarborough Country

April 28, 2004

JOE SCARBOROUGH: Today, the senator‘s office tried to strong-arm us into retracting that story. . . .

Last night, we showed you comments made by Hillary Clinton that criticized George Bush and America‘s foreign policy in the Middle East. Her complaints run by Arab newspapers and repeated across the Middle East. She said this—quote—

“Their stubbornness and arrogance is breathtaking. And, as a result, we continue to go down a path that I think is fraught with horrible dangers, especially for the young men and women serving in Iraq, but also for Iraqis, for the stability of the region.”. . .

Early this morning, Ms. Clinton‘s office began calling our staff and the president of MSNBC, claiming the statements we reported last night were never made by the senator. . . .

This morning at about 10:00 a.m., we got an angry phone call from Senator Clinton‘s office. They were demanding an apology and a retraction. They said she never spoke to the Arab press. She never criticized the president, and, in fact, never did the interview at all.

Our producers immediately double-checked our sources and we tracked down the reporter who did the interview with Senator Clinton, and by noon we found out that the interview did take place. And the senator‘s press secretary then started to back down.

And by 4:30 this afternoon, the senator‘s representatives admitted that she did the interview. She did know the reporter was writing to an international audience, and she did criticize the president.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: arabpress; asharqalawsat; bullying; censorship; goonsquads; hillary; hillaryknew; hitlary; hrc; intimidation; scarborough; tokyohillary; traitor
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-123 next last

1 posted on 04/29/2004 8:36:24 PM PDT by Carl/NewsMax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
What a sleazy woman.
2 posted on 04/29/2004 8:40:19 PM PDT by dagnabbit (Islamic Immigration is the West's Suicide)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Well! Who'd a thunk!
3 posted on 04/29/2004 8:41:31 PM PDT by It's me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
I'm less shocked that HilLIARy made those statements than by the fact that MSNBC actually fought back.
4 posted on 04/29/2004 8:41:43 PM PDT by martin_fierro ("I actually threw away my medals - before I didn't" -- J Effin' K)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
The truth will set us free. Hitlery and her evil cohorts must be defeated. I would prefer destroyed, but that is up to God.
5 posted on 04/29/2004 8:42:19 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
psycho b----

She really annoys me
6 posted on 04/29/2004 8:42:19 PM PDT by aragona (Support GWB!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
"This morning at about 10:00 a.m., we got an angry phone call from Senator Clinton‘s office. They were demanding an apology and a retraction. They said she never spoke to the Arab press. She never criticized the president, and, in fact, never did the interview at all.


"Our producers immediately double-checked our sources and we tracked down the reporter who did the interview with Senator Clinton, and by noon we found out that the interview did take place. And the senator‘s press secretary then started to back down."

Typical Clintoon. Just plain un-American if you ask me.
7 posted on 04/29/2004 8:42:49 PM PDT by BenLurkin (LESS government please, NOT more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: Carl/NewsMax
CLINTON LIED??? Say it ain't so!!
9 posted on 04/29/2004 8:44:15 PM PDT by Feiny (Happiness is subversive to liberals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
What did have to lose? Their average daily viewership is so abysmal, Hillary! can't hurt them.
10 posted on 04/29/2004 8:44:43 PM PDT by lavrenti (I'm not bad, just misunderstood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
What did they have to lose? Their average daily viewership is so abysmal, Hillary! can't hurt them.
11 posted on 04/29/2004 8:44:56 PM PDT by lavrenti (I'm not bad, just misunderstood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
demoCommiecRAT party, aiders, abetters, comfort givers to our enemies!!!!:-(
12 posted on 04/29/2004 8:45:44 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
I think as big a story was Scarborough's first piece about Bush not asking Rumsfeld's opinion about going to war. He amped that story up to such a degree that I had to turn him off. I'm afraid this might be trouble for Bush.
13 posted on 04/29/2004 8:47:06 PM PDT by Zechariah11 ("so they weighed for my hire thirty pieces of silver")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
"I'm less shocked that HilLIARy made those statements than by the fact that MSNBC actually fought back."

Me too! I'm speechless.
I might just have to write a "nice" letter to MSNBC for a change.

Now is the time to hit Hillary. We need to get the word out to everyone fast.

14 posted on 04/29/2004 8:47:17 PM PDT by GottaLuvAkitas1 (What a Tangled Web We Weave . .when first we practice to deceive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro
Being part of the story trumps any story, everytime. They prolly didn't know Hil would have any problem with their reporting her statement. Hil made the whole thing so much juicier, by trying to bully em.
15 posted on 04/29/2004 8:47:34 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
deny, deny, deny, untill your caught, then spin it.

This lying witch will do anything.

I will not comment any more, I will get banned....
16 posted on 04/29/2004 8:47:34 PM PDT by The Mayor (Don't let tragedy steal your trust in God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anubus
She would be a political whore only. In the ordinary sense, Hitlery would have few customers, except for a few 1940's era Germans currently residing in Brazil, who might still go for the massive ankles and thighs.
17 posted on 04/29/2004 8:47:43 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Ooooh, this is TOO juicy.

It seems to this FReeper that Hillary has been behind the whole Dem nomination process to this point. When Howard the Duck looked "poised" to take the nom and run the Clinton money machine out of town, the Clinton party machine revved up the Kerry campaign. Now that Kerry is the "presumed" nom, we've seen the Clinton FBI files slime machine drip-drip on him to where liberals are already having buyer's remorse.

Now, Hillary has to backtrack on some liberal-traitor red-meat comments she makes overseas, to "Maintain her political viability within the system."

She's running folks, my date in the "Hillary Annointed" pool is Thursday, September 23rd.

18 posted on 04/29/2004 8:48:26 PM PDT by Henchster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
BUMP!
19 posted on 04/29/2004 8:48:40 PM PDT by jmstein7 (Real Men Don't Need Chunks of Government Metal on Their Chests to be Heroes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
I wish Scarborough had great ratings for this one. The trouble is, he doesn't, but thanks for posting it.
20 posted on 04/29/2004 8:49:40 PM PDT by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defender2
What does a person have to do to get charged with treason! It seem like a naughty child she's just keeps pushing the limit to see how much she can get by with. She does think she's above all rules and laws.
21 posted on 04/29/2004 8:50:40 PM PDT by hoosiermama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
When the time comes, Hitlary will tear JFK's nodes off with the speed of a moray eel. I agree, look for an "unexpected" Hitlary nomination as candidiate for president in September.
22 posted on 04/29/2004 8:52:16 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
What does a person have to do to get charged with treason!

Democrats get a pass. Didn't you get the memo?

23 posted on 04/29/2004 8:54:03 PM PDT by Mad_Tom_Rackham (Any day you wake up is a good day.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Hillary must have thought that Scarborough was still a congressman so first threatened him with the exposure of his FBI files ........
24 posted on 04/29/2004 8:54:53 PM PDT by prognostigaator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anubus
At 40 yrs of age, I hope to hell the actuaries and life expectency charts are correct. If so, I will find relief pissing on the rodham f!!%k's grave some day. .... course, I just increased the chances to slightly greater than zero that I'll get fostered...... what a country.... her ilk, by the way are why the patriot act must be reworked.... not islam.
25 posted on 04/29/2004 8:56:27 PM PDT by James Mabry (Tell me again why it is too early to start the shooting?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
A clinton lied?

What a shocker!

26 posted on 04/29/2004 8:56:47 PM PDT by South40 (Amnesty for ILLEGALS is a slap in the face to the USBP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
#21. Good question. Frankly I've had more than enough from the way they've been acting.
27 posted on 04/29/2004 8:56:51 PM PDT by Defender2 (Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Defender2
Did you say RAT?

28 posted on 04/29/2004 8:57:45 PM PDT by Mike Bates (Artist Formerly Known as mikeb704.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax; ntnychik; devolve; MeekOneGOP; PhilDragoo; dixiechick2000; Happy2BMe
Lying History and the lying liar who wrote it - HERSELF - continues to lie!!
29 posted on 04/29/2004 8:58:17 PM PDT by potlatch ( Medals do not make a man. Morals do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Wish I could read the entire article, but the link is blank for whatever reason.
30 posted on 04/29/2004 8:59:27 PM PDT by ladyinred (Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
lyingcheatingamericahatingsocialistfascistpowermadfatankleduglydownrightnastyb!tch...
31 posted on 04/29/2004 8:59:31 PM PDT by NewLand ("I never knew how good Hunt's ketchup was...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TXBubba
Ping
32 posted on 04/29/2004 9:00:12 PM PDT by beaversmom (Michael Medved has the Greatest radio show on GOD's Green Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Now, I ask you, would a commiecRAT ho-bitch lie? Do a duck quack?
33 posted on 04/29/2004 9:00:28 PM PDT by Waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax

Nothing Todd wouldn't do, all in the name of konservatizm, of course.

34 posted on 04/29/2004 9:00:40 PM PDT by Cultural Jihad (x = x + 1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
but the link is blank for whatever reason

Same thing with me.

35 posted on 04/29/2004 9:00:58 PM PDT by beaversmom (Michael Medved has the Greatest radio show on GOD's Green Earth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: aragona
She really annoys me<

Annoys is mild for what I would like to type.
36 posted on 04/29/2004 9:01:58 PM PDT by John Lenin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama
She IS above the law, which is why she thinks it! Never any consequences for the Clinton's.
37 posted on 04/29/2004 9:02:29 PM PDT by ladyinred (Kerry has more flip flops than Waikiki Beach)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
I am starting to like this guy Scarborough.

Hillary knew she was talking to the international press. She could have surmised that the Arab press would, in turn, seize upon her remarks.

She chooses her words carefully, and fully anticipates the effect. She meant to bash Bush and to demoralize our men and women in Iraq.

Scarborough has exposed her for the traitor that she is.
38 posted on 04/29/2004 9:03:06 PM PDT by Palladin (Proud to be a FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Correct.
Damn shame too.
39 posted on 04/29/2004 9:03:39 PM PDT by onyx (Kerry' s a Veteran, but so were Lee Harvey Oswald, Timothy McVeigh and Benedict Arnold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
One more filthy little puzzle piece.
40 posted on 04/29/2004 9:04:08 PM PDT by GOPJ (NFL Owners: Grown men don't watch hollywood peep shows with wives and children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: John Lenin
This is link works for me.

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/4862940/
41 posted on 04/29/2004 9:05:06 PM PDT by GottaLuvAkitas1 (What a Tangled Web We Weave . .when first we practice to deceive!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
BTTT
42 posted on 04/29/2004 9:06:00 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
You're right...Whole areas of the transcript are totally blank. How conveeeeeenient of MSNBC!
43 posted on 04/29/2004 9:06:49 PM PDT by lainde (Heads up...We're coming and we've got tongue blades!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
SCARBOROUGH: Hold on a second. At 10:00 this morning, Senator Clinton‘s press people called our office, said that we lied, that she never even gave this interview, that she never even made these comments. She called the president of MSNBC. She demanded that we retract the statement. She never made them. At 12:30, we found out...

WOLFSON: She did not call the president of MSNBC.

SCARBOROUGH: No, she did not. Her press secretary called the president of MSNBC twice. I said her office did. And check the transcripts on that one, too.

And, tonight, I think you are splitting hairs. And, again, the bigger point is, what kind of impact does this kind of talk have on the morale of our troops overseas?

WOLFSON: Let me say two things. One, we don‘t walk away from her comments one iota.

You want to know about the impact? The impact is that we live in a democracy. And some people in a democracy here in the United States these days want to stifle debate. You would rather have debate over the way George Bush has conducted this war, presumably after the war is over, 10 years from now. That‘s not the time for the debate.

There are legitimate questions being raised about the way George Bush brought this country to war. You don‘t want to debate the fact that he told us we had weapons of mass destruction in Iraq and we couldn‘t find any.

snip


SCARBOROUGH: I cannot believe that Senator Hillary Clinton believes that. Does Senator Hillary Clinton really believe that United States policy in the Middle East has made the Middle East, has made Iraq worse off today than it was before Saddam Hussein was taken out of power?

WOLFSON: I think a lot of people have real questions about whether the Middle East is safer or not.

SCARBOROUGH: Does Senator Hillary Clinton believe that? What does Senator Hillary Clinton believe? What does she believe?

(CROSSTALK)

WOLFSON: I will tell you.

She has real questions about whether or not—as she said, real questions about whether or not the region is safer now than it was before. And the reason is that the way George Bush took this country to war. Senator Clinton voted for the war resolution. The president came before the nation and said: We are facing a grave threat. I need a war resolution to deal with this. And as patriotic Americans, many of us supported him.

And you know what? It‘s turned out that he has misled the American people, that many of the things he told us were not true, that we have made many enemies in the Middle East that we had not had before based on the way we conducted ourselves. So, yes, there are questions being raised and they are appropriate questions.

44 posted on 04/29/2004 9:07:00 PM PDT by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavrenti
Maybe they might figure out that the Left is a saturated market, but the rest of the political spectrum has a lot of room for competition.
45 posted on 04/29/2004 9:08:16 PM PDT by thoughtomator (yesterday Kabul, today Baghdad, tomorrow Damascus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
geez- a story criticizing her heinousness in the press...??? who'da thunk it...
46 posted on 04/29/2004 9:08:54 PM PDT by Mr. K (ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,I stole this cuz its funny,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Henchster
It's be IMPOSSIBLE,even for Hitlery! to pull that off,at that date.Please remove your tinfoil.:-)
47 posted on 04/29/2004 9:09:01 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Liar, liar, crusty pants on fire.
48 posted on 04/29/2004 9:09:13 PM PDT by cyncooper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Carl/NewsMax
Her arrogance and her spokesman's arrogance is breathtaking.So much for the truth.I don't care if she was speaking to the international press,what does she think international means?.

.She denied what she said ,then the excuse is that she did not give an interview specifically to the arab press,using her power to suppress(it worked) and the harm to our military morale and to our mission in Iraq continues.It would seem our troops don't matter...it's an election year.
49 posted on 04/29/2004 9:10:09 PM PDT by MEG33 (John Kerry's been AWOL for two decades on issues of National Security!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mad_Tom_Rackham
Not gonna happen;especially NOT at the end of September!
50 posted on 04/29/2004 9:10:14 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-123 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson