Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bad New Days for Voting Rights (Barf Alert)
New York Times ^ | 4/18/04 | New York Times

Posted on 04/18/2004 12:39:19 PM PDT by wagglebee

It has been years since the bad old days when Southern blacks were given "literacy tests," and voting rights activists were beaten and killed. But blacks, Hispanics and Indians are still regularly discouraged from voting, often under the guise of "ballot integrity" programs that are supposed to be aimed at deterring fraud at the polls.

Minority vote suppression tears at the fabric of American democracy. It persists, however, for a simple reason: in close elections, when some minority groups are strongly identified with a single party, it can be the difference between winning and losing. In 2002, the Indian vote in South Dakota helped Senator Tim Johnson win by just 528 votes.

Today, in Bennett County, S.D., Indians say they have to contend with poll workers who make fun of their names, election officials who make it hard for them to register and — most ominously — a wave of false voter fraud charges that have been made against them, which they regard as harassment. Jo Colombe, a Rosebud Sioux tribal council member, said that when she worked as a poll watcher in a recent election she was accused of fraud simply for taking a bathroom break. When she returned, she said, white poll watchers charged her with copying the names of Indians who had not yet voted, and taking them out to Indians waiting in the parking lot. In January, prosecutors dropped a highly publicized case against another Indian woman, Rebecca Red Earth-Villeda.

With South Dakota's senior senator, Tom Daschle, running in another hotly contested race this year, Indians are bracing for more trouble at the polls. Many Indians feel their situation is similar to other so-called ballot integrity efforts over the last few decades. In the 1986 Louisiana Senate race, for instance, Republicans began a purge of tens of thousands of voters. An internal party document made clear that the goal was to "keep the black vote down." In North Carolina's 1990 Senate race, Jesse Helms supporters mailed 125,000 postcards to predominantly black voting precincts, misleading voters about residency requirements and warning that misstatements to voting officials could mean five years in prison.

More recently, Republican poll watchers in the 2002 Arkansas Senate election took photos of blacks as they voted, an intimidation tactic that has been used in other parts of the country. In last fall's Kentucky governor's race, Republicans announced plans to challenge voters in 59 predominantly black precincts. After the N.A.A.C.P. objected, the program was scaled back. And this year, a local Texas prosecutor threatened to arrest students at historically black Prairie View A&M if they tried to vote from their campus addresses, which the law allows them to do. He backed down when he was sued.

Intimidation of Hispanic voters has often focused on immigration matters. In one case that caused an uproar in California in 1988, Republicans hired uniformed security officers to serve as "poll guards" in Latino precincts in Orange County.

Federal and state officials, party leaders and voters themselves should act now to ensure that this loathsome and undemocratic trend stops. To achieve this:

¶The Republican and Democratic party chairmen should publicly commit not to single out minority voters for intimidation, and to get this message out to party workers at every level.

¶The National Association of Secretaries of State, and individual secretaries of state and state election officers, should state publicly that they will be on the lookout for minority vote suppression, and that they will deal with it strictly.

¶The Department of Justice, which has lately seemed more focused on voter fraud than minority voter intimidation, should explain how it intends to discharge its legal duty to protect minorities from discrimination in voting.

¶Prosecutors should vigorously pursue anyone involved in vote suppression; this is rarely done now. And its victims should bring civil lawsuits, to make those who engage in it pay.

Experts are predicting that this year's election will be among the most hard fought in decades. The people who play a leadership role in it should be making clear, well in advance of Election Day, that minority vote suppression will not be tolerated.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Dakota
KEYWORDS: election; pollwatchers; voterfraud; votingrights
It persists, however, for a simple reason: in close elections, when some minority groups are strongly identified with a single party, it can be the difference between winning and losing.

The Democrats created voting rights discrimination, fillibustered to keep minorities from voting. Now they seem to think the Republicans try to intimidate minorities from voting. It seems they are already gearing up for a court battle when "Puff" Daschle loses. Never mind that he is a liberal loser in a fairly conservative state, the courts can fix it.

1 posted on 04/18/2004 12:39:19 PM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The NY Times has repeatedly violated my civil rights by advocating suffrage for unqualified groups, and hiding abuses of same.
2 posted on 04/18/2004 12:56:02 PM PDT by an amused spectator (Kristen Breitweiser didn't want to learn how to land the 9/11 Commission; she only wanted to steer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
----maybe the Demotraitors should start by requiring that all of their voters (and candidates, for that matter) be alive--
3 posted on 04/18/2004 1:33:35 PM PDT by rellimpank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The New York Times is irrelevant and has reached Weekly World News status.
4 posted on 04/18/2004 1:41:42 PM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (EEE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Have a proctologist on hand at all polling places for an exam if that is what it is going to take to eliminate millions of fraudulent RAT votes. I want to hear more RATmedia screams so forget the lubricant.
5 posted on 04/18/2004 1:49:42 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (America's Enemies foreign and domestic RATmedia agree: Bush must be destroyed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Today, in Bennett County, S.D., Indians say they have to contend with poll workers who make fun of their names

I know this is true. My Indian buddy Jimmy Farting Buffalo can attest to this!

6 posted on 04/18/2004 2:05:19 PM PDT by Bommer (John Kerry = "You mean I can get a Purple Heart for cutting myself shaving?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Barf Alert is right. I am a minority. I feel that my vote is disenfranchised when election laws condone or even encourage voter fraud.
7 posted on 04/18/2004 6:29:11 PM PDT by Kuksool (9-11 happened when the RATS controlled the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: backhoe; TheLion; sweetliberty
Pro Voter Fraud Alert.
8 posted on 04/18/2004 6:38:48 PM PDT by Kuksool (9-11 happened when the RATS controlled the Senate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Do you think that the Old Gray Whore would support a solid identification program at the polling places, the kind that Democrats holler about whenevr they are proposed?

Do you think that the former "paper of record" would make mention of Democrat efforts to suppress and disallow the miltary vote in Florida in 2000?

I don't think so.
I think the scumbags at the DNC house organ, the New York Times, want to help the Democrats get as many dead, ficticious, homeless, and multiple votes as possible.
9 posted on 04/18/2004 6:43:50 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kuksool; nicmarlo; Budge; Saundra Duffy; Travelgirl
Thanks for the ping. Seems the RATs are warming up the fraud machine early.
10 posted on 04/18/2004 6:44:55 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Weekly World News? Lately, the Old York Times is rival to the National Enquirer!!!!!!
11 posted on 04/18/2004 6:45:35 PM PDT by dirtbiker (Solution for Terrorism: Nuke 'em 'till they glow, then shoot 'em in the dark!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Bommer
Today, in Bennett County, S.D., Indians say they have to contend with poll workers who make fun of their names

Yes. My injun friend, Dead-Democrat-Vote-Ten-Times gets mad when people make fun of his name, too.

12 posted on 04/18/2004 6:46:15 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sweetliberty; Kuksool; nicmarlo; Budge; Saundra Duffy; Travelgirl
Thanks for the Ping Kuksool!

Don't you hate the rat fraud machine....The NY Times acts as their ally to continue the vote fraud game.

All attempts to clean it up are now labeled "Voter Supression" and what's worse.... we're picking on those poor minorities.

Time we warm up our anti-vote fraud machine sweetliberty!
13 posted on 04/18/2004 8:48:39 PM PDT by TheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson