Iraqi: Most Muslim intellectuals for terror

WorldNetDaily.com ^ | Saturday, April 17, 2004

[Mamzelle]

re: .. Time and again, both have proven to be impractical and ineffective at doing anything for the human condition. Just proves they are all mentally deranged and / or evil. )))

Intellectuals are vain of their ideas and intellect--we do not take the sin of vanity seriously, but it is at the root of much evil.

[Mark17]

Yep. Both of 'em.

LOL. Now that I think of it, you are right. I doubt if there are more than two intellectuals involved with Islam. If a person is truly an intellectual, he will not be a Muslim.

[WOSG]

This brave Iraqi is one of the exceptions, of course. "This is due first of all to the military supremacy of others, and second because in this generation the alternative of nonviolent struggle is a more effective weapon," he says. "I have adopted this perception and called it by the Islamic name 'Civil Jihad.'" Kishtainy says he tried to establish an organization in London to promote his views among Muslims but was rebuffed. "I contacted some Arab ambassadors and activists in Islamic organizations, and all I got from them was their turning their backs, and even threats," he says. "Only three Muslims shared my belief – one from Ethiopia and two from Iraq. Over the course of two years, we struggled [for the sake of this goal]; then we lost hope and gave up." He says most of the Muslims he and his colleague contacted "were of the opinion that the Westerners are sons of dogs who understand only force, and that the Muslims have no choice but to strap on their weapon and fight."

I nominate him to be President of Iraq

[jpl]

This guy just painted a big bullseye on his forehead, he better get himself some security.

[Ronzo]

PING!

Another "must read" article...

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!