Skip to comments.
Congress Seeks Authority to Overturn Supreme Court Decisions
Talon News ^
| 04/16/04
| Jimmy Moore
Posted on 04/16/2004 7:43:48 PM PDT by coffeebreak
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
To: Walkingfeather
I don't get it - the proposal is that congress can overturn supreme court decisions with a supermajority. Doesn't congress already have all the power that it needs. If the supreme court is correctly interpreting the constitution, then an ammendment is necessary (if an outcome not supported by the supermajority is reached.) If the supreme court consistently misinterprets the constitution, then a judge can be impeached and removed by supermajority (isn't this correct)?
To: Torie
I would support an amendment in this regard, however, I would want it to be more like a super super majority of about 80%.
62
posted on
04/17/2004 9:04:18 AM PDT
by
FreeAtlanta
(never surrender, this is for the kids)
To: coffeebreak
IF congress wants to impeach a activist judge they can by super majority.... you havent thought it through. You want Ginsberg,Kennedy, souter gone? IMPEACH THEM. Rule #1 use the tools that you have in your posession don't reinvent the wheel.
To: sweetliberty; Mo1; nicmarlo; wirestripper; TheBattman; steplock
Ping!
64
posted on
04/17/2004 10:04:09 AM PDT
by
Budge
(<><)
To: coffeebreak
Lewis states the judiciary has ceased interpreting the law and is now making law. Someone in D.C. finally notices what We The People have been saying for for years!
65
posted on
04/17/2004 10:11:40 AM PDT
by
Budge
(<><)
To: Valpal1
All they have to do is impeach the activists on the 9th Circuit Court (the most overturned court in the history of the world and they are just begging for it) and you would see judicial circumspection flower across the land. Agreed - - but, do you see this ever happening?
Lord knows they have had plenty of chances to do this, and not just the 9th in California, but everywhere.
66
posted on
04/17/2004 10:25:54 AM PDT
by
Budge
(<><)
To: coffeebreak
"Something MUST be done..."
That is why we have the Bill of Rights - starting with the First Amendment Right to Political Speech - and the Second Amendment in case our "reprehensible representative lawyer/politican/judges" refuse to listen.
That is why they are so adamant in stealing our right to bear arms --- they are the reason for the amendment!
67
posted on
04/17/2004 10:51:08 AM PDT
by
steplock
(http://www.gohotsprings.com)
To: coffeebreak
Don't worry about the "gotcha weenies" on this board - they live only to show superiority that they read EVERYTHING and NEVER miss anything!
Good articles deserve reposting for those of us that do not live on this board.
68
posted on
04/17/2004 10:53:05 AM PDT
by
steplock
(http://www.gohotsprings.com)
To: coffeebreak
- "The great object of my fear is the federal judiciary. That body, like gravity, ever acting, with noiseless foot, and unalarming advance, gaining ground step by step, and holding what it gains, is engulfing insidiously the special governments into the jaws of that which feeds them. ... It has long, however, been my opinion, and I have never shrunk from its expression...that the germ of dissolution of our federal government is in the constitution of the federal Judiciary; ...working like gravity by night and by day, gaining a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing its noiseless step like a thief, over the field of jurisdiction, until all shall be usurped. ... The judiciary of the United States is the subtle corps of sappers and miners constantly working under ground to undermine the foundations of our confederated fabric. They are construing our Constitution from a coordination of a general and special government to a general and supreme one alone."
--Thomas Jefferson
69
posted on
04/17/2004 5:28:16 PM PDT
by
Mikey
To: coffeebreak
This legislation is absurd. When was the last time that Congress passed a good Constitutional law that ended up being struck down by the Supreme Court? I can't think of an instance right off the top of my head. Where are people getting the idea that Congress would be passing all sorts of wonderful laws were it not for the SCOTUS standing in the way? The notion is frankly quite laughable. Give Congress free rein to do whatever it wants, and you can kiss this Republic goodbye. Count on it.
70
posted on
04/17/2004 5:51:05 PM PDT
by
Sandy
To: coffeebreak
Of course, even if this were to come to pass - it would wind up in a vicious circle - as some court would overturn the law....
71
posted on
04/17/2004 9:10:26 PM PDT
by
TheBattman
(Leadership = http://www.georgewbush.com/)
To: Torie
I believe the constitution does, in fact, give limiting power over the courts to the legislature. This is all part of the ballance of power that our form of government is SUPPOSE to abide by. Unfortunately the courts have decided that they are the "Kings" of the country...
72
posted on
04/17/2004 9:12:38 PM PDT
by
TheBattman
(Leadership = http://www.georgewbush.com/)
To: Budge
I have hope. I think the gay marriage issue has enraged and educated the silent majority. We may yet see voters sending a clear message to congress to grow some nads and do what is right.
In the mean time I harangue my rep and senators regularly about the need to reign in the judiciary with an impeachment or two.
73
posted on
04/17/2004 9:31:11 PM PDT
by
Valpal1
(Impeach the 9th! Please!!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson