Skip to comments.
Super Bowl streaker arguing no one said not to
Associated Press ^
| March 30, 2004
Posted on 03/30/2004 3:57:18 PM PST by Dog Gone
The Brit who stripped to a thong and danced a jig on the field before a stunned Super Bowl crowd intends to plead innocent to trespassing because no one told him he couldn't do it, he said after a court appearance today.
Mark Francis Roberts, 39, was fully clothed and advertising-free when he visited a county court-at-law in downtown Houston. After he agreed to another hearing on April 22, Roberts told The Associated Press he planned to go to trial on the misdemeanor charge.
Roberts, asked by attorney Sharon Levine not to discuss the case specifically, said he didn't mind the prospect of two more trans-Atlantic flights for the hearing and a trial.
"I like to fly," the Liverpudlian said.
The post-Super Bowl chatter was dominated by halftime performer Janet Jackson's baring of her right breast on national television, although few in the stadium noticed it. Conversely, CBS didn't air Roberts' antics but he was in full view of fans in their seats.
Plenty of other cameras captured him, however, and his stunt was shown repeatedly on television and on the Internet after the game.
Roberts doesn't deny he was the one who darted onto the Reliant Stadium field in a tear-away referee's uniform, stripped near the kicking tee before the second half began and started dancing and displaying a skin-borne advertisement for an online casino.
Police were slow to react, and Roberts appeared to be running out of dance moves before they finally charged the field. New England Patriots linebacker Matt Chatham leveled Roberts, who was carried from the field by officers.
His sponsor carries images of the incident on its Web site and Roberts does the same on his own Internet page, www.thestreaker.org.uk.
"I'm not charged with streaking," Roberts said.
The contention of Roberts and Levine, who works for famed attorney Richard "Racehorse" Haynes, is that no one told Roberts he was not allowed on the field.
"It's on video, so there's no question as to what happened," Levine said. "It's just a question as to whether he violated any laws.
"Under trespass you're entitled to a warning that entrance is forbidden."
And Roberts said he saw no such warnings.
"Nothing at all," he said.
Police said Roberts got into the game with a legitimate ticket wearing a referee outfit held together with Velcro under civilian clothes. He was charged with criminal trespass and public intoxication.
According to his site, Roberts has streaked more than 300 times. He has cases pending in Paris and back home in Liverpool, and his Super Bowl moment was his first North American venture.
If convicted of the Class B misdemeanor, Roberts could spend up to six months in jail and pay a fine of up to $2,000. A trial setting likely would come this summer.
TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Texas; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: ignorancedefense; streaker; superbowl
1
posted on
03/30/2004 3:57:19 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
2
posted on
03/30/2004 4:00:44 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
IIRC, George Costanza used this defense as well when asked about sleeping with the cleaning lady.
"Was I wrong? Should I not have done that? I gotta tell ya, I gotta plead ignorance on this one. Had I known that that sort of thing was frowned upon......"
To: BMiles2112
The whole reason he does this routine is because he knows it's frowned upon. He'd better not opt for a jury trial in Texas, because Texans know BS when they see it.
Plea bargain, pay a fine, and stay out of jail.
4
posted on
03/30/2004 4:12:33 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: BMiles2112
And if IIRC he still got fired for it. LoL
5
posted on
03/30/2004 4:12:38 PM PST
by
scab4faa
(Can't sleep.. the clowns will eat me... Can't sleep.. the clowns will eat me... Can't sleep..)
To: Dog Gone
welcome to texas :)
6
posted on
03/30/2004 4:12:43 PM PST
by
KOZ.
(i'm so bad i should be in detention)
To: BMiles2112
what does IIRC mean? I feel dopey asking having seen it so many times.
7
posted on
03/30/2004 4:13:51 PM PST
by
corkoman
(Logged in - have you?)
To: Dog Gone
Yeah, well, good luck. I tried that when my boss found me rifling through his desk and it didn't hold water for me and it won't for him either.
BTW- there was some great porn on that site, the next day anyways.
Owl_Eagle
Unleash the Hogs of Peace.
P.J. O'Rourke Parliament of Whores
8
posted on
03/30/2004 4:14:20 PM PST
by
Owl_Eagle
("I AIN'T GOT TIME FO' YO' JIBBA JABBA, FOOL!!!"~ Mr. T.)
To: KOZ.
Why thanks. I got here as fast as I could.
9
posted on
03/30/2004 4:15:18 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: corkoman
Internet shortcut for If I Recall Correctly....
10
posted on
03/30/2004 4:16:21 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: corkoman
If I Recall Correctly....
11
posted on
03/30/2004 4:16:53 PM PST
by
eureka!
(The shrillness of the left is a good sign.....)
To: Dog Gone; hchutch
The contention of Roberts and Levine, who works for famed attorney Richard "Racehorse" Haynes, is that no one told Roberts he was not allowed on the field.Putting up a fence or railing separating the seating area from the playing field is more than sufficient notice. I don't have "No Trespassing" signs on my property, but I am fully within my rights to detain trespassers.
12
posted on
03/30/2004 4:17:34 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Dog Gone
I thought we were the Puritans and the Brits were uninhibited in comparison, yet our streakers didn't wear thongs.
To: Poohbah
He fully expected to be arrested. He's been arrested every other time he's done this stunt before. Some weenie lawyer is trying to suggest a defense that simply won't fly.
He's really dumb to take it to trial unless he wants to live in the Harris County jail for a few weeks.
14
posted on
03/30/2004 4:30:17 PM PST
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
And Roberts said he saw no such warnings. I haven't seen any warnings that a ball peen hammer upside this guy's head is forbidden, either.
15
posted on
03/30/2004 4:38:10 PM PST
by
Izzy Dunne
(Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
To: All
I think he was told he couldn't do it the 300 other times he was reprimanded.
Technically, he was told "no" multiple times.
Any lawyer with a brain can get around that one. Of course, I'm sure some idiot judge who wants to liberalize the world will let him go.
16
posted on
03/30/2004 4:40:11 PM PST
by
packing heat
(I don't take no sassafrass!)
To: Poohbah
I don't have "No Trespassing" signs on my property, but I am fully within my rights to detain trespassers.Not sure where you live but in most jurisdictions you have no right to detain anyone. You can request that they leave but if you do not have signs posted it would be tantamount to kidnapping. And even with the signs you best just ask.
You can kick them out of your house, but don't leave marks or other signs of force like blood and teeth.
17
posted on
03/30/2004 4:40:35 PM PST
by
harrowup
(Just naturally perfect and humble of course)
To: Dog Gone
If Texas prosecutes this poor slob, they had best put out the arrest warrants for the other two televised sluts for public indecency.
18
posted on
03/30/2004 4:56:02 PM PST
by
steplock
(http://www.gohotsprings.com)
To: Dog Gone
Isn't this the basis of most of the moronic liability cases---the company didn't warn me? For example, the woman who drank a fifth of bourbon a day while pregnant and had a brain damaged child, then sued the distiller because there was no warning that she shouldn't do that.
19
posted on
03/30/2004 4:57:26 PM PST
by
Dahoser
(They RATS are waging war on many fronts. That's the big picture.)
To: BMiles2112
IIRC, George Costanza used this defense as well when asked about sleeping with the cleaning lady. "Was I wrong? Should I not have done that? I gotta tell ya, I gotta plead ignorance on this one. Had I known that that sort of thing was frowned upon......" Hahahahaa ... was gonna post that :)
To: harrowup
Not sure where you live but in most jurisdictions you have no right to detain anyone.It depends on the situation. If the person refuses to leave and poses an imminent threat to my quiet enjoyment of my property by his conduct (such as doing the hootchy-kootchy butt-nekkid in front of my daughter), yes, I can use reasonable force to detain him until the cops show up.
21
posted on
03/30/2004 5:01:52 PM PST
by
Poohbah
("Would you mind not shooting at the thermonuclear weapons?" -- Maj. Vic Deakins, USAF)
To: Dog Gone
The streaker who skated onto the ice during last weekend's world championships had the same website advertised on his chest. I wonder if they are liable for "inciting or solicitation of streaking" or some other BS.
22
posted on
03/30/2004 5:07:37 PM PST
by
Flightdeck
(Death is only a horizon)
To: corkoman
I feel dopey asking having seen it so many times. LOL! I never did ask about GMTA ---I finally looked it up in the Freeper Lexicon.
For those who remain ignorant it's: Great Minds Think Alike. I'm pretty good at guessing them but I could not crack that one!
23
posted on
03/30/2004 5:07:56 PM PST
by
stands2reason
( During the cola wars, France was occupied by Pepsi for six months.)
To: Dog Gone
I love this!
It's Al Gore's "no controlling legal authority" argument redux!
To: Mr. Buzzcut
See #23
To: Poohbah
If the person refuses to leave and poses an imminent threat to my quiet enjoyment of my property by his conduct (such as doing the hootchy-kootchy butt-nekkid in front of my daughter), yes, I can use reasonable force to detain him until the cops show up. Nope. Your obligation is to protect your daughter (tell her to go inside the house) if that is your choice. You can order him off your property and call the police to effect that process, but, you may not physically detain him and that most certainly includes the use of any kind of firearm or other deadly weapon.
The term is reasonable and you could probably chase the guy and kick his ass and get away with it; but, if he has a lawyer, he'll sue, and win eventually which is why your insurance company will pay him off. Check your umbrella policy.
26
posted on
03/30/2004 6:34:50 PM PST
by
harrowup
(Just naturally perfect and humble of course)
To: Poohbah
Putting up a fence or railing separating the seating area from the playing field is more than sufficient notice. I don't have "No Trespassing" signs on my property, but I am fully within my rights to detain trespassers. Plus, isn't there usually lots of legal mumbo-jumbo on the reverse side of every ticket, saying that if you violate certain rules, you are subject to being thrown out of the game and/or arrest?
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson