Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Stern Threatens To Quit If Bush Signs Indecency Bill
FMQB ^ | March 11, 2004

Posted on 03/11/2004 7:03:02 PM PST by GulliverSwift

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last
To: GulliverSwift
Well....it's a Beaattchh isn't it Howard, when the adults are in charge.
41 posted on 03/11/2004 7:19:51 PM PST by goodnesswins (The Democrat "Funeral" is on.....dum..dum..di...dum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Stern is threatening to quit anyway if President Bush signs new indecency legislation into law.

And the downside is???

42 posted on 03/11/2004 7:20:04 PM PST by pfflier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Both I think. He's dull --- same stuff over and over --- I actually didn't know he was still around until the recent threads about him leaving his show. I can't say I'm an expert but the 20 minutes I listened to him, I can only say he was hysterical over himself but wasn't funny. I think like Alec Baldwin he's trying to make himself politically more important than he ever could be.
43 posted on 03/11/2004 7:20:18 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
He's going to satellite ....... they will pay to buy out his contract ....... and he/they will make even more as their masthead shock jock

.

44 posted on 03/11/2004 7:20:41 PM PST by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Maybe you have forgotten about the Clintons having Bill O'Reilly audited THREE times and trying to put Rush out of business.

And he failed to shut Rush down under existing laws.

Think he'll have better luck with new laws?

45 posted on 03/11/2004 7:21:46 PM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: myrabach
"Who's Howard Stern and why should I care?"

Howard Stern is an aging long haired radio guy whose significance in human development lies in the single fact that under the giuse of silencing his brand of speach, our government is setting president to silence others. Its actually our willingness to let government burocrats decide who is to speak and who is to be silenced that is the sad tale.

"Go ahead, take away my rights. I'm not using them."
46 posted on 03/11/2004 7:21:54 PM PST by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift



You can't fire me, I quit. LOL
47 posted on 03/11/2004 7:22:51 PM PST by SouthernFreebird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
if he is on a pay channel, very few will spend the extra money. they would likely put him on one of the "included" stations, to see if they could increase subscribers.
48 posted on 03/11/2004 7:23:18 PM PST by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
How, oh how, will we go on?
49 posted on 03/11/2004 7:24:05 PM PST by Skooz (My Biography: Psalm 40:1-3)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #50 Removed by Moderator

To: Elle Bee
How can he shock? Nothing is really very shocking anymore --- I think that's his major problem -- it's all he's ever had going and the repetitiveness of his routine will doom it. It was years ago when I listened to him -- it was stupid and vulgar but far from shocking.
51 posted on 03/11/2004 7:24:24 PM PST by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
"And if Howard Stern is allowed to continue with his perversion schtick, the 'rats (when in power) will leave conservatives alone? Is that your argument?"

Up until now, we have had free speach. They may have wanted to go after Rush and others, but they did not have the legal tools. We just gave them to them.

Stern's popularity was wanning anyway. The guy was planing to give it up soon.
52 posted on 03/11/2004 7:25:14 PM PST by dinok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Door meet ass.
53 posted on 03/11/2004 7:25:48 PM PST by rintense
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
I guess "the Murder Channel" would be OK too. And the "IV Drug channel".

The current crap on the networks is no better. It's simply 'bread and circuses' mixed with propaganda.

To imply that the current broadcast lineup is wholesome simply because it doesn't feature "Debbie Does Dallas" and "IV Drug Channel" is ludicrous.

And the means by which the the public is to keep this kind of stuff out of the culture would be through some kind of diligent, 100% effective all the time, channel blocking everywhere, on every TV set that children could and might see. and the same for radios, we need foolproof parental controls for those also.

If parents spent more time teaching their children right and wrong, instead of trying to control everybody else's life, then the kids would simply turn it off themselves.

54 posted on 03/11/2004 7:25:56 PM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Hmmmmm...just in time for MTV spring break shows. LOL!
55 posted on 03/11/2004 7:26:53 PM PST by anncoulteriscool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dinok
They may have wanted to go after Rush and others, but they did not have the legal tools. We just gave them to them.

What could be in an "indecency bill" that would impact Rush?

56 posted on 03/11/2004 7:28:17 PM PST by DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet ("Lashing out" at Democrats since 1990.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: Mulder
Think he'll have better luck with new laws?

After turning the IRS on every so-called conservative in the country, who had a radio show, newspaper or magazine article, I doubt they can. If the Clinton crime gang couldn't get it done, no one can. They are PROFESSIONALS at it.

57 posted on 03/11/2004 7:28:49 PM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
What a terrible loss to society.
58 posted on 03/11/2004 7:31:23 PM PST by pepperdog (God Bless and Protect our Troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GulliverSwift
Stern is threatening to quit anyway if President Bush signs new indecency legislation into law.

Is there supposed to be bad news in there?

59 posted on 03/11/2004 7:33:16 PM PST by TC Rider (The United States Constitution © 1791. All Rights Reserved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
After turning the IRS on every so-called conservative in the country, who had a radio show, newspaper or magazine article, I doubt they can.

Isn't that a crime?

60 posted on 03/11/2004 7:33:17 PM PST by Mulder (Fight the future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 201-202 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson