Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Perle Resigns
ABC News ^ | Feb. 25, 2004 | Brian Hartman, Martha Raddatz and Chris Vlasto

Posted on 02/25/2004 8:50:56 PM PST by Oorang

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Agree.
21 posted on 02/25/2004 9:37:35 PM PST by nuconvert (CAUTION: I'm an acquaintance of someone labelled :"an obstinate supporter of dangerous fantasies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
How could you disagree with a man who is going to defeat "Evil" itself?
22 posted on 02/25/2004 9:38:28 PM PST by Burkeman1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Afro_conservative
So you support Perle using the justice system to sue and clog up the courts because you agree with him but others should hang their head in shame.

If that's what it takes to prove he was slandered, you damn straight.

23 posted on 02/25/2004 9:39:14 PM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
Go to bed, before you make more of a fool of your self, than you already have done.

Had another bad day ?

24 posted on 02/25/2004 9:41:40 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Nope,this is a uaual kind of post, for him, poor dear. :-(
25 posted on 02/25/2004 9:42:34 PM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Burkeman1
How could you disagree with a man who is going to defeat "Evil" itself?

LOL! Like I said, I do disagree with some of his ideas. I take particular issue with his argument in favor of a national identity card in his recent book.
26 posted on 02/25/2004 9:44:08 PM PST by Jaysun (COVER THY PALE LEGS AND SHUT UP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jaysun
What's wrong with an identity card?
27 posted on 02/25/2004 9:45:51 PM PST by nuconvert (CAUTION: I'm an acquaintance of someone labelled :"an obstinate supporter of dangerous fantasies")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
Count on Perle to go unquietly into that good night. Rage, Richard, rage.

Hooray for him.Now, let's see just how much REAL coverage this gets...

28 posted on 02/25/2004 9:47:17 PM PST by gatorbait (Yesterday, today and tomorrow......The United States Army)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
The antagonism directed towards Perle on this board utterly perplexes me. He's in a sense the anti-Powell in that his statements and positions typically reflect the administration's true stance on issues that diplomacy prevents them from publicly embracing.

And the man's nothing if not downright prescient. As this October 2001 interview illustrates..
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/gunning/interviews/perle.html

Q: If we go into Iraq and we take down Hussein?

A: Then I think it's over for the terrorists.

Q: Why so optimistic?

A: Because having destroyed the Taliban, having destroyed Saddam's regime, the message to the others is, "You're next." Two words. Very efficient diplomacy. " You're next, and if you don't shut down the terrorist networks on your territory, we'll take you down, too. Is it worth it?" Of course it isn't worth it. It isn't worth it for any of them.
29 posted on 02/25/2004 9:53:45 PM PST by Itaintwhy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert; Oorang; Khan Noonian Singh; Cap Huff
"Seems I might be the only Perle fan here."

i also like perle.

quote from the article- "Senior Pentagon officials said that, despite the controversial statements and writings, Rumsfeld did not ask for Perle's resignation."

perle has been on the outs with rumsfeld. the message for perle was clear as stygian waters. rumsfeld had no need to ask in words.

30 posted on 02/25/2004 10:05:24 PM PST by Persephone Kore (princess of darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Persephone Kore
<< perle has been on the outs with rumsfeld >>

How do you know this?

31 posted on 02/25/2004 10:09:43 PM PST by Khan Noonian Singh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Khan Noonian Singh; Oorang; nuconvert; Cap Huff
"How do you know this?"

it is not a dark secret.

it is even in perle's resignation letter itself - post #6 higher up in this thread. perle's letter starts:

"Dear Mr. Secretary, Thank you for finding time to see me on February 10."

what a sarcastic start to an official letter!

what could possibly be the reason for this sarcasm? i think perle hasn't seen much of rumsfeld lately. wouldn't you agree?

32 posted on 02/25/2004 10:28:08 PM PST by Persephone Kore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Khan Noonian Singh
Nonsense..He is outstanding--the best international strategist..This frees him to say what he wants without worrying about the Administration..He has a great slander case and I am glad he is finally pursuing it
33 posted on 02/25/2004 10:30:56 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi
< < Nonsense..He is outstanding--the best international strategist..This frees him to say what he wants without worrying about the Administration..He has a great slander case and I am glad he is finally pursuing it > >

"Nonsense"? I agree with you. Had you intended to reply to somebody else's post?

34 posted on 02/25/2004 10:35:05 PM PST by Khan Noonian Singh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
What's wrong with an identity card?

Another Government program and I'm not sure what useful purpose it would actually serve. Unless the Government decides to limit things like flying or entering and exiting the country to citizens with a national ID card, I don't think that it would do much for security.

As I said, I agree with Richard on lots of things, but the ID proposal doesn't make sense to me.
35 posted on 02/25/2004 10:45:51 PM PST by Jaysun (COVER THY PALE LEGS AND SHUT UP.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Persephone Kore
A week ago Perle called for the resignation of Tenet at CIA and Jacoby at DIA. Either he had to go or they did.
36 posted on 02/25/2004 11:02:06 PM PST by Khan Noonian Singh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Khan Noonian Singh
Yes---I am sorry I hit the wrong button.
37 posted on 02/25/2004 11:03:22 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Persephone Kore
Nothing sarcastic in that--really--
38 posted on 02/25/2004 11:04:39 PM PST by the Real fifi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: the Real fifi
No problem.

I am sorry to see Perle go, but he'll be back.

39 posted on 02/25/2004 11:06:05 PM PST by Khan Noonian Singh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Khan Noonian Singh
A week ago Perle called for the resignation of Tenet at CIA

What amused (that's not the right word) me about that was the Perle was a major proponent of the Saddam -> WMD link via Chalabi and now he's trying to blame the CIA for giving him the intelligence he wanted. If the CIA would of said that there were no WMD Perle would of just said that they were fools.
40 posted on 02/25/2004 11:30:36 PM PST by lelio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson