Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schwarzenegger meets with Bush, expects 'a lot' of federal money
AP via North County Times ^ | February 23, 2004 | ERICA WERNER

Posted on 02/24/2004 1:19:55 PM PST by calcowgirl

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger emerged from meetings at the White House and the Capitol Monday predicting he would get "a lot" more federal money for California, but citing no specific commitments.

The governor met in a group with President Bush and one-on-one with Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, chairman of the Senate Appropriations Committee. He said afterward he expects the money to come.

"I expect to get a lot of it simply because, you know, I'm very persuasive and I'm like, you know, a tick that hangs on it and will not let go until I get what I want," Schwarzenegger told reporters outside Stevens' Capitol office.

Asked whether he'd gotten any commitments from Stevens, Schwarzenegger said: "I judge Sen. Stevens facial expressions and it was kind of like the kind of facial expression that indicated to me, 'You're right Arnold, you should get the money,' and so we're just waiting for the moment when they get us the money."

Stevens did not immediately respond to a request for comment left with his spokeswoman.

Schwarzenegger was in town for a National Governors Association conference, his first trip to Washington since taking office and his first chance to meet fellow governors.

Tuesday marks his 100th day in office, but he has had little success so far in fulfilling his campaign pledge to be "the Collectinator" of federal money for California. The budget Bush sent to Congress this month had little good news for the state.

Schwarzenegger said he talked to Stevens about federal reimbursement for jailing illegal immigrants who commit crimes. Paying for jailing criminal aliens is projected to cost California more than $700 million in the state fiscal year beginning in July, but Bush's budget deleted federal funding for the program.

He and Stevens also discussed homeland security funding, Schwarzenegger said.

Schwarzenegger had no private meeting with Bush, but the two sat at the same table at a banquet Sunday night and Schwarzenegger and the rest of the governors met with the president Monday morning. They talked about state issues including homeland security, welfare reform and highway funding.

On another topic, Schwarzenegger was asked at a news conference with other governors whether he supported a federal constitutional amendment to ban gay marriage, and whether such an amendment would succeed in California.

Fellow Republican Gov. Haley Barbour of Mississippi said he supported such an amendment, and Olene Walker of Utah, also a Republican, said such an amendment would likely prove popular in her state. Schwarzenegger sidestepped the question.

"We have a law in California, and we now concentrate on the next thing, which is to get the economy back," he said. Conservative groups expect Bush to endorse a constitutional ban on same-sex marriages.

Schwarzenegger opposes the gay marriages being performed in San Francisco, though he supports domestic partnership rights. California law says marriage is between a man and a woman.

Later Monday Schwarzenegger was attending a Republican Governors Association fund-raiser where donors were paying to get their pictures taken with him and President Bush. He was the only governor requested by the GOP governors group to pose for photos with donors, his spokesman said.

On Tuesday Schwarzenegger was to meet with Californians in Congress, then head to New York to raise money to promote Propositions 57 and 58, the state ballot measures to authorize $15 billion of borrowing and require balanced budgets and a reserve fund. The measures go before voters March 2.

Schwarzenegger said he was also meeting in New York with billionaire investor Warren Buffett, an economic adviser, "and all the big geniuses in the bond market to make sure that we get good rates for when we sell our bonds."

For the second day in a row Schwarzenegger mixed with the other governors Monday, but still stood out. He admonished reporters at a press conference to pay more attention to the other governors present.

"Let me just tell you something, each one of these governors is a star," Schwarzenegger said.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: calgov2002; ny; schwarzenegger; sidestep; warrenbuffet; warrenbuffett
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 02/24/2004 1:19:56 PM PST by calcowgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge; SierraWasp; Ernest_at_the_Beach; farmfriend; Carry_Okie; heleny; kellynla
Lots of interesting tidbits in this article.
2 posted on 02/24/2004 1:21:27 PM PST by calcowgirl (No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
No state should get more money than it contributes, ever.
3 posted on 02/24/2004 1:21:33 PM PST by Bikers4Bush (Flood waters rising, heading for more conservative ground. Write in Tancredo in 04'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Sounds as though Ahnold wants to rob Peter to pay Paul.
4 posted on 02/24/2004 1:21:40 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
) -- Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger emerged from meetings at the White House and the Capitol Monday predicting he would get "a lot" more federal money for California, but citing no specific commitments

California was a rich state, still is for the most part. Their liberal state government has made their bed, let them lie in it. Why should the rest of us pay taxes to bail out their failed experiment with socialism not-so-lite?

5 posted on 02/24/2004 1:22:47 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
California was a rich state, still is for the most part. Their liberal state government has made their bed, let them lie in it. Why should the rest of us pay taxes to bail out their failed experiment with socialism not-so-lite? Putting CA's electoral votes in the Bush column is worth whatever needs to be spent.
6 posted on 02/24/2004 1:28:46 PM PST by CaptainLou
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
California receives $0.82 in Federal Spending for every $1.00 of tax collected, ranking 44th out of the 50 states.

Ohio receives $1.01 for every $1.00 collected, ranking 32nd.

New Mexico receives over $2.00 for every $1.00, ranking 1st.

New Jersey receives $0.67 for every $1.00 ranking 50th.
7 posted on 02/24/2004 1:29:41 PM PST by So Cal Rocket (If consistency is the hobgoblin of small minds, John F. Kerry’s mind must be freaking enormous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
No state should get more money than it contributes, ever.

No state should get any money from the federal treasury period. The only things the federal government should be spending money on are federal matters, like national defense, interstate highways, (and not those which are merely local freeways), the postal sytem, the mint, etc. If that means some states get nothing, to bad. We'd all pay lower taxes, and it would represent a return to the Constitution, at least in part.

8 posted on 02/24/2004 1:29:56 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
No state should get more money than it contributes, ever.

I totally agree.
The concept of everyone contributing to things like the military seems to escape some people.

9 posted on 02/24/2004 1:30:01 PM PST by calcowgirl (No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bikers4Bush
No state should get more money than it contributes, ever.

  That would help California immensely. Right now we get back something like 70 cents to the dollar.

  If all those midwestern farm states stopped draining off all the federal funds, we'd be doing all right.

Drew Garrett

10 posted on 02/24/2004 1:30:41 PM PST by agarrett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: CaptainLou
California in the Bush column is not going to happen. If it does, the election will have been such an rout that it wouldn't have been needed.
11 posted on 02/24/2004 1:32:53 PM PST by OneTimeLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: So Cal Rocket
California receives $0.82 in Federal Spending for every $1.00 of tax collected, ranking 44th out of the 50 states.

Interesting, but irrelevent. The federal government doesn't exist to dole out money, equitably or not. If there is federal business to be done in California, then the money needs to be spent there. Otherwise it's a local matter. Before California sent so many liberals to Congress California had lots and lots of miltary bases, due to the presence of good ports, lots of land for manuevers, and good flying weather in many places. But those liberals raped the defense budget (and the NASA and DOE budgets, a good chunk of which was spent in California), and so the money is no longer spent on those things.

12 posted on 02/24/2004 1:35:36 PM PST by El Gato (Federal Judges can twist the Constitution into anything.. Or so they think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: calcowgirl
Any thoughtful Californian should consider that Arnold appears to have more juice in D.C. than their two liberal senators, their liberal House minority leader, and their liberal congressmen. The conclusion should be obvious, that having an overwhelmingly liberal representation there hurts the state badly. California needs more of a balanced political life, what they have had just isn't working.
13 posted on 02/24/2004 1:36:32 PM PST by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CaptainLou
Putting CA's electoral votes in the Bush column is worth whatever needs to be spent.

Just can't repeat that, or emphasize that enough! Yes indeed!

Bush MUST be re-elected, and damn the Treasury, the Constitution or any mere Law that gets in the way.

That's why YOU and I both support an EO that orders a Consitutional Amendment that will send $100 million to every registered Republican voter in California. And $100 BILIION to Mr. Terminator, the native of Austria who is entitled to be our next Emperor, ummm, President.

He just reads facial expressions so well!

Yeee HAH!

14 posted on 02/24/2004 1:37:40 PM PST by bvw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
That reminde me that it seems to me that the liberals have perverted the meaning of the term "First Responder" to the point that when I hear it I immediately think "Political Pork".
15 posted on 02/24/2004 1:38:43 PM PST by johnb838 (Phoney Medals, Real-life Traitor, J. Effing Kerry, Esq.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: agarrett
If all those midwestern farm states stopped draining off all the federal funds, we'd be doing all right.

Why single out 'midwestern'?. California gets a chunk of that too.

In fact, Republican Senate candidate Bill Jones pulled in over $4 million! Cut all the subsidies out!

16 posted on 02/24/2004 1:39:32 PM PST by calcowgirl (No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Sounds as though Ahnold wants to rob Peter to pay Paul.

I was thinking the same thing. Since illegal immigration costs Californians billions of dollars every year, I wonder if there was any discussion about border control. That doesn't seem to be on the agenda it seems, even though Californians are screaming for it.

17 posted on 02/24/2004 1:41:03 PM PST by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: El Gato
Why should the rest of us pay taxes to bail out their failed experiment with socialism not-so-lite?

To make a Republican governor, a true Conservative hero, look good.

18 posted on 02/24/2004 1:41:56 PM PST by templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: janetgreen
The people of NYS have allowed our legislature to spend us into a hole, too. Gee, should we expect a federal bailout next? Show us the money...
19 posted on 02/24/2004 1:43:22 PM PST by mewzilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: bvw
Not knowing where to put the sarcasm tags, that is one SCARY post!
20 posted on 02/24/2004 1:45:17 PM PST by calcowgirl (No on Propositions 55, 56, 57, 58)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson