Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heads should roll' over Iraq (says Richard Perle)
Toronto Star ^

Posted on 02/18/2004 6:45:27 PM PST by Happy2BMe

Feb. 18, 2004. 01:00 AM
DANNY JOHNSTON/AP
U.S. President George W. Bush is applauded by the army and National Guard troops during a speech at Fort Polk, La., yesterday in which he defended the U.S. war in Iraq. Fort Polk is home to more than 6,300 troops who are in Iraq.
`Heads should roll' over Iraq
Adviser wants U.S. intelligence chiefs to quit

Cites faulty conclusions on Saddam's weapons

ERIC ROSENBERG
SPECIAL TO THE STAR

WASHINGTON—Richard Perle, a chief proponent of last year's U.S. invasion of Iraq, yesterday called for the chiefs of the Central Intelligence Agency and the U.S. Defence Intelligence Agency to step down because of their faulty conclusions that Saddam Hussein possessed mass-killing weapons.

Perle, a close adviser to U.S. Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, said top officials made no attempt to skew the intelligence about Saddam Hussein's alleged weapons of mass destruction. Instead, he implied, top policymakers relied in good faith on the conclusions of the intelligence agencies.

"George Tenet has been at the CIA long enough to assume responsibility for its performance," Perle told reporters, referring to the director of the agency. "There's a record of failure and it should be addressed in some serious way."

"The CIA has an almost perfect record of getting it wrong in relation to the (Persian) Gulf going back to the Shah of Iran," Perle said. He called for "a shakeup" in the U.S. intelligence establishment.

"I think, of course, heads should roll," he said. "When you discover that you have an organization that doesn't get it right time after time, you change the organization, including the people.

"I'd start with the head head," Perle said when asked which heads should roll at the CIA. Perle said the DIA " is in at least as bad shape as CIA (and) needs new management."

Navy Vice-Adm. Lowell Jacoby has headed the agency since July, 2002.

U.S. President George W. Bush, Rumsfeld and Secretary of State Colin Powell have said they relied on intelligence from the CIA and DIA in their assertions that Saddam had stockpiles of mass-casualty weapons. The claim was the main rationale for the U.S-led invasion.

David Kay, former head of the U.S. weapons-hunting team in Iraq, has concluded it was highly unlikely that Saddam possessed stockpiles of such weapons.

"It turns out we were all wrong, probably, in my judgment, and that is most disturbing," Kay said last month.

While Kay dismissed the prospect that stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction would ever be found in Iraq, Perle disputed him on two relatively minor claims: that Iraq wasn't seeking to enrich uranium or develop mobile weapons laboratories to manufacture chemical or biological weapons.

"The jury is still out" on those points, Perle said.

Perle, the former chairman of — and current member of — the Defence Policy Board, a senior level advisory panel to Rumsfeld, was an advocate for overthrowing Saddam, asserting in the months leading up to the war that the Iraqi dictator's weapons stockpiles posed a grave threat to the United States.

In the lead-up to the war, Perle regularly warned about Saddam's reputed arsenal and the danger that would follow if the United Nations failed to get the Iraqi dictator to disarm.

Tenet was first appointed by president Bill Clinton and confirmed by the Senate in 1997 and then moved over to the Bush administration after the 2000 election. His agency has been criticized for the Iraqi weapons episode and for failing to detect the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist strikes.



TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: cia; dia; intelligence; iraq; jacoby; perle; prewarintelligence; richardperle; tenet; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last
To: Prodigal Son
It was just a matter of time before that (obvious) troll got zotted.
61 posted on 02/19/2004 12:16:00 PM PST by Mr. Mojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Yeah, holding the decision makers responsible is just too obvious I suppose.

I wonder why it never occurs to anyone to ask: if Saddam had all these weapons for 10+ years, and the intent to use them on the U.S., just what he was waiting for?

62 posted on 02/19/2004 4:05:54 PM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: alpowolf
"I wonder why it never occurs to anyone to ask: if Saddam had all these weapons for 10+ years, and the intent to use them on the U.S., just what he was waiting for?"

It would have been suicide for him to use them against us. Even during Desert Storm, field commanders had tactical nuclear weapons at their disposal. Saddam knew it.

Ditto Operation Iraqi Freedom.

Any questions?

63 posted on 02/19/2004 6:24:16 PM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
In other words, he was deterred from attacking us. Even during the Clinton years. Ergo no threat to us.

Any questions?

64 posted on 02/20/2004 5:33:24 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
I agree. They should roll. Starting with Hussein's and the rest of his murderous thugs.
65 posted on 02/20/2004 5:37:44 AM PST by xusafflyer (Keep paying those taxes California. Mexico thanks you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mercy
After 9/11 the US grounded all air travel for all US citizens and for all foreign citizens too. The only group of people that were allowed to fly around the US and outside the US was the Saudi citizens including Osama Bin Laden's relatives. This fact was never addressed fully in the media. It illustrates that in the US Saudi relation, the US is the passive weaker partner. That is very embarrassing behavior from the world only superpower.
66 posted on 02/20/2004 5:48:49 AM PST by philosofy123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: alpowolf
"Any questions?"

Are you an American citizen, and if so, have you been one for very long?

67 posted on 02/20/2004 8:26:38 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: philosofy123; SJackson; dennisw; Salem

SAUDI In America


68 posted on 02/20/2004 8:32:09 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Been an American citizen all of my life, 43 years.

Anything else?

69 posted on 02/20/2004 8:43:50 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: alpowolf
"Been an American citizen all of my life, 43 years."

"Anything else?"

Yes. You are hated in the Middle East because you are "an American." In fact, you are hated so much because of this, you would likely get your head handed to you in a basket in any of the Islamic countries simply by walking up and down the streets and telling those around you of your citizenship.

That is why we had to invade Iraq.

Case closed.

70 posted on 02/20/2004 9:20:11 AM PST by Happy2BMe (U.S.A. - - United We Stand - - Divided We Fall - - Support Our Troops - - Vote BUSH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe
Nice way to change the subject. BTW I don't suppose it occurred to you to wonder why they hate us.

The fact that some citizens of some Islamic countries hate Americans does not even come close to being a legitimate casus belli.

Case closed? Nah. But your eagerness to stop the discussion speaks volumes.

71 posted on 02/20/2004 9:25:54 AM PST by alpowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: mercy

And Baer's always tied at the hip to Vince Cannistraro, Mohamed Alamoudi, Joe Wilson, etc


72 posted on 03/12/2007 2:31:13 AM PDT by piasa (Attitude Adjustments Offered Here Free of Charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-72 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson